18 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Holland v. Stategreen2 sentences2007The trial court determined that pursuant to this Court's holding in Holland v. State, 705 So.2d 307, 341 (Miss.1997), Dr. Hayne could provide an opinion about whether the defendant's version of the events and the evidence as found on the victim were consistent with his findings within a reasonable degree of medical certainty. 2004The trial court determined that pursuant to this Court’s holding in Holland v. State, 705 So. 2d 307, 341 (Miss. 1997), Dr. Hayne could provide an opinion about whether the defendant’s version of the events and the evidence as found on the victim were consistent with his findings within a reasonable degree of medical certainty. | 2 | 2 |
Harris v. Stategreen1 sentence2023See Harris v. State, 757 So. 2d 195, 199 (Miss.2000) (holding that because the defendant did not object to the issue of restitution in the trial court, the issue was barred upon appeal); see also Powell v. State, 536 So. 2d 13, 17 (Miss.1988) (same); Watts v. State, 492 So. 2d 1281, 1290-91 (Miss. 1986) (same). 1 Regardless of whether the trial court conducted the inquiry into a defendant’s financial ability to pay restitution at the time of sentencing as set forth in section 99-37-3(2), it is clear that probation or post-release supervision cannot be revoked, and the defendant cannot be incar | 1 | 1 |
Powell v. Stategreen1 sentence2023See Harris v. State, 757 So. 2d 195, 199 (Miss.2000) (holding that because the defendant did not object to the issue of restitution in the trial court, the issue was barred upon appeal); see also Powell v. State, 536 So. 2d 13, 17 (Miss.1988) (same); Watts v. State, 492 So. 2d 1281, 1290-91 (Miss. 1986) (same). 1 Regardless of whether the trial court conducted the inquiry into a defendant’s financial ability to pay restitution at the time of sentencing as set forth in section 99-37-3(2), it is clear that probation or post-release supervision cannot be revoked, and the defendant cannot be incar | 1 | 1 |
Ross v. Stategreen1 sentence2023See Ross v. State, 122 So. 3d 136, 138 (¶¶9-12) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Watts v. Stategreen1 sentence2023See Harris v. State, 757 So. 2d 195, 199 (Miss.2000) (holding that because the defendant did not object to the issue of restitution in the trial court, the issue was barred upon appeal); see also Powell v. State, 536 So. 2d 13, 17 (Miss.1988) (same); Watts v. State, 492 So. 2d 1281, 1290-91 (Miss. 1986) (same). 1 Regardless of whether the trial court conducted the inquiry into a defendant’s financial ability to pay restitution at the time of sentencing as set forth in section 99-37-3(2), it is clear that probation or post-release supervision cannot be revoked, and the defendant cannot be incar | 1 | 1 |
Derouen v. Stategreen1 sentence2016“Evidence of a sexual offense, other than the one charged, which involves a victim other than the victim of the charged offense for which the accused is on trial,” may be considered by the jury “if properly admitted under Rule 404(b), filtered through Rule 403, and accompanied by an appropriately-drafted limiting or cautionary instruction^]” Green v. State, 89 So.3d 543, 549 (¶ 15) (Miss.2012) (quoting Derouen v. State, 994 So.2d 748, 756 (¶ 20) (Miss.2008)). ¶ 12. | 1 | 1 |
Green v. Stategreen1 sentence2016“Evidence of a sexual offense, other than the one charged, which involves a victim other than the victim of the charged offense for which the accused is on trial,” may be considered by the jury “if properly admitted under Rule 404(b), filtered through Rule 403, and accompanied by an appropriately-drafted limiting or cautionary instruction^]” Green v. State, 89 So.3d 543, 549 (¶ 15) (Miss.2012) (quoting Derouen v. State, 994 So.2d 748, 756 (¶ 20) (Miss.2008)). ¶ 12. | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stategreen1 sentence2016As T.J. testified at trial after the trial court conducted a hearing outside the presence of the jury, “the sole issue is whether the ‘time, content, and circumstances of the statement provide substantial indicia of reliability.’ ” Smith v. State, 925 So.2d 825, 837 (Miss.2006). | 1 | 1 |
Peterson v. Stategreen1 sentence2011The trial court conducted a hearing, pursuant to Peterson v. State, 518 So.2d 632, 636 (Miss.1987), and found the prior conviction to be admissible for impeachment purposes. | 1 | 1 |
Turner v. Stategreen1 sentence2000See Turner v. State, 732 So. 2d 937 (Miss. 1999). 2 Money Pillai (the owner of Mims One Stop), Trent Turner (Hart Turner's brother), and Dent Turner (Hart Turner's uncle) are hereinafter referred to collectively as "the new defendants." The entire group of plaintiffs will be referred to as "Curry." Where necessary, first names will be used to avoid confusion. 2 therefore precluded recovery.3 The trial court conducted a hearing on the various motions to dismiss and dismissed the new defendants with prejudice because the statute of limitations had run. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Polk v. State
green
2 sentences1999The trial court conducted a hearing outside the presence of the jury to determine whether or not the DNA testimony would be allowed in front of the jury in accord with Polk v. State, 612 So.2d 381 (Miss.1992). ¶ 29. 1997The trial court conducted a hearing outside the presence of the jury to determine whether or not the DNA testimony would be allowed in front of the jury in accord with Polk v. State, 612 So. 2d 381 (Miss. 1992). ¶29. | 2 | 1997–1999 |
Pendergraft v. Mississippi
neutral
2 sentences1997Relying on Pendergraft v. State, 213 So.2d 560 (Miss.1968), appeal dismissed, 394 U.S. 715 , 89 S.Ct. 1453 , 22 L.Ed.2d 671 (1969), reh'g denied, 395 U.S. 941 , 89 S.Ct. 1993 , 23 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969), the trial court held that Evans lacked standing to challenge statutory technicalities and overruled the motion. ś 162. 1993Relying on Pendergraft v. State, 213 So. 2d 560 (Miss.1968), appeal dismissed, 394 U.S. 715 (1969), reh'g denied, 395 U.S. 941 (1969), the trial court held that Evans lacked standing to challenge statutory technicalities and overruled the motion. ¶162. | 2 | 1993–1997 |
D'Ercole v. United States
green
2 sentences1997Relying on Pendergraft v. State, 213 So.2d 560 (Miss.1968), appeal dismissed, 394 U.S. 715 , 89 S.Ct. 1453 , 22 L.Ed.2d 671 (1969), reh'g denied, 395 U.S. 941 , 89 S.Ct. 1993 , 23 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969), the trial court held that Evans lacked standing to challenge statutory technicalities and overruled the motion. ś 162. 1993Relying on Pendergraft v. State, 213 So. 2d 560 (Miss.1968), appeal dismissed, 394 U.S. 715 (1969), reh'g denied, 395 U.S. 941 (1969), the trial court held that Evans lacked standing to challenge statutory technicalities and overruled the motion. ¶162. | 2 | 1993–1997 |
Pendergraft v. State
green
2 sentences1997Relying on Pendergraft v. State, 213 So.2d 560 (Miss.1968), appeal dismissed, 394 U.S. 715 , 89 S.Ct. 1453 , 22 L.Ed.2d 671 (1969), reh'g denied, 395 U.S. 941 , 89 S.Ct. 1993 , 23 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969), the trial court held that Evans lacked standing to challenge statutory technicalities and overruled the motion. ś 162. 1993Relying on Pendergraft v. State, 213 So. 2d 560 (Miss.1968), appeal dismissed, 394 U.S. 715 (1969), reh'g denied, 395 U.S. 941 (1969), the trial court held that Evans lacked standing to challenge statutory technicalities and overruled the motion. ¶162. | 2 | 1993–1997 |
Samuel Wilcher, Jr. v. Lincoln County Board of Supervisors
green
1 sentence2019Critically, just two weeks later, the Supreme Court completely transformed the test for municipal liability under the MTCA in Wilcher v. Lincoln County Board of Supervisors & City of Brookhaven, 243 So. 3d 177 (Miss. 2018). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Berry v. State
green
2 sentences2015Id. 2015Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Idaho v. Wright
green
2 sentences2000In that hearing, the trial court specifically received evidence and arguments on the twelve factors identified in Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990), as relevant to a hearsay exception under M.R.E. 803(25). 2000In that hearing, the trial court specifically received evidence and arguments on the twelve factors identified in Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990), as relevant to a hearsay exception under M.R.E. 803(25). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Journey v. Long
green
1 sentence1999Id. at 1270 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Utah Public Service Commission v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
green
1 sentence1997Relying on Pendergraft v. State, 213 So.2d 560 (Miss.1968), appeal dismissed, 394 U.S. 715 , 89 S.Ct. 1453 , 22 L.Ed.2d 671 (1969), reh'g denied, 395 U.S. 941 , 89 S.Ct. 1993 , 23 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969), the trial court held that Evans lacked standing to challenge statutory technicalities and overruled the motion. ś 162. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
In re Dennett
neutral
1 sentence1997Relying on Pendergraft v. State, 213 So.2d 560 (Miss.1968), appeal dismissed, 394 U.S. 715 , 89 S.Ct. 1453 , 22 L.Ed.2d 671 (1969), reh'g denied, 395 U.S. 941 , 89 S.Ct. 1993 , 23 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969), the trial court held that Evans lacked standing to challenge statutory technicalities and overruled the motion. ś 162. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Kordic v. Esperdy
green
1 sentence1997Relying on Pendergraft v. State, 213 So.2d 560 (Miss.1968), appeal dismissed, 394 U.S. 715 , 89 S.Ct. 1453 , 22 L.Ed.2d 671 (1969), reh'g denied, 395 U.S. 941 , 89 S.Ct. 1993 , 23 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969), the trial court held that Evans lacked standing to challenge statutory technicalities and overruled the motion. ś 162. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Mississippi Publishers Corp. v. Coleman
green
2 sentences1994Prior to doing so, the trial court conducted a hearing on the motion and entered an order containing specific findings of fact and a finding that the court had considered less restrictive alternatives to closure. 515 So.2d at 1164 . 1994The closure order was limited, and the petitioner was "to be granted access to a complete transcript of all closed, pre-trial proceedings." Id. at 1166 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Brown v. State
green
1 sentence1992In Brown v. State, 533 So.2d 1118 (Miss. 1988), before the defendant entered a guilty plea, the trial court conducted a hearing on his demurrer to the indictment. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Norwood v. State
green
1 sentence1977In Norwood v. State, 258 So.2d 756 (Miss. 1972) the court conducted a hearing on motions of the defendant to suppress evidence and suppress declaration of the defendant from approximately 4:00 o'clock p.m. until 6:00 o'clock p.m. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.