Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Virginia opinions name it 4 courts 1996–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Middlekauff v. Allstate Insurancegreen1 sentence2023Middlekauff, 247 Va. at 153 (“she alleges a ‘pattern of abusive behavior,’ continuing over an extended period of time”; this cannot be construed as an “injury by accident”). | 1 | 1 |
West v. Westgreen1 sentence2023Father contends that the GAL was not qualified under Code § 16.1-266, the court did not correctly calculate the GAL’s fees, and the court erred in the December 7, 2021 order by assigning the GAL’s fees only to him. 3 It appears that the GAL remained involved with the family after entry of the final decree. 4 Only the transcript from the August 20, 2021 hearing is a part of the record. 5 The GAL’s filing is not in the record. 6 A transcript of this hearing is not included in the record, and the April 28, 2022 order is not before us on appeal. -3- On appeal, “we presume the judgment of the trial | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Chatmangreen2 sentences2017If left uncorrected by this Court, that error leads to the grave injustice of a mentally ill person being incarcerated instead of receiving inpatient hospitalization as required by Code * See Commonwealth v. Chatman, 260 Va. 562, 572 , 538 S.E.2d 304, 309 (2003) (“[i]f an acquittee is mentally ill and in need of inpatient hospitalization, the court must commit the acquittee”). 2017If left uncorrected by this Court, that error leads to the grave injustice of a mentally ill person being incarcerated instead of receiving inpatient hospitalization as required by Code * See Commonwealth v. Chatman, 260 Va. 562, 572 , 538 S.E.2d 304, 309 (2003) (“[i]f an acquittee is mentally ill and in need of inpatient hospitalization, the court must commit the acquittee”). | 1 | 1 |
Landrum v. CHIPPENHAM AND JOHNSTON-WILLISgreen2 sentences2012Landrum, 282 Va. at 352 , 717 S.E.2d at 137 (internal quotation marks omitted). 2012Landrum, 282 Va. at 352 , 717 S.E.2d at 137 (internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Mina v. Minagreen2 sentences2007In Mina v. Mina, 45 Va. App. 215, 217 , 609 S.E.2d 622, 624 (2005), we held that a trial court’s decision to expressly reserve ruling on a party’s request for attorney’s fees in an order adjudicating the merits of the claim upon which the request for attorney’s fees was based was not a final order for purposes of appeal. -4- There, the trial court conducted a hearing on a motion to vacate an order for future distribution of retirement pay. 2007In Mina v. Mina, 45 Va. App. 215, 217 , 609 S.E.2d 622, 624 (2005), we held that a trial court’s decision to expressly reserve ruling on a party’s request for attorney’s fees in an order adjudicating the merits of the claim upon which the request for attorney’s fees was based was not a final order for purposes of appeal. -4- There, the trial court conducted a hearing on a motion to vacate an order for future distribution of retirement pay. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Head v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1997Id. 1997Id. | 2 | 1996–1997 |
Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 619-21 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Blockburger v. United States
green
2 sentences2011The trial court found no double jeopardy violation under Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), and no violation of Code § 19.2-294. 2011The trial court found no double jeopardy violation under Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), and no violation of Code § 19.2-294. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Sisson & Ryan, Inc.
green
2 sentences2001Tacit or indirect approval for a hearing on the question of attorney’s fees after a trial has been concluded can also be found in the case of C. & P. Telephone v. Sisson and Ryan, Inc., 234 Va. 492 , 362 S.E.2d 723 (1987). 2001Tacit or indirect approval for a hearing on the question of attorney’s fees after a trial has been concluded can also be found in the case of C. & P. Telephone v. Sisson and Ryan, Inc., 234 Va. 492 , 362 S.E.2d 723 (1987). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Lynch v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1997Lynch v. Johnson, 196 Va. 516 (1954). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.