159 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2025 25 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2024Williams v. State, 958 S.W.2d 186 , 195–96 (Tex. Crim. 2019Williams v. State, 958 S.W.2d 186, 195-96 (Tex. Crim. | 7 | 10 |
Jackson v. Dennogreen2 sentences2017The trial court conducted a hearing pursuant to Jackson 4 v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 (1964). 2015The trial court conducted a hearing pursuant to Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 (1964). | 5 | 14 |
In Re MSgreen2 sentences2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. [7] In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 547-48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982)). [8] Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978)). [9] Id. at 65-66, 120 S.Ct. at 2060 (citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 (1944)). [10] M.S., 115 S.W.3d a 2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. [7] In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 547-48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982)). [8] Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978)). [9] Id. at 65-66, 120 S.Ct. at 2060 (citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 (1944)). [10] M.S., 115 S.W.3d a | 4 | 4 |
Lenz v. Lenzgreen2 sentences2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. [7] In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 547-48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982)). [8] Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978)). [9] Id. at 65-66, 120 S.Ct. at 2060 (citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 (1944)). [10] M.S., 115 S.W.3d a 2009Code Ann. § 153.002 (Vernon 2008) (“The best interest of the child shall always be the primary consideration of the court in determining the issues of conservatorship and possession of and access to the child.”); M.S., 115 S.W.3d at 549 ; Lenz v. Lenz, 79 S.W.3d 10, 14 (Tex. 2002) (reiterating legislature’s mandate that best interest of child is primary consideration). 16 … Tex. Fam. | 3 | 3 |
Nolen v. Stategreen2 sentences1999Cf. Stern v. State, 922 S.W.2d 282, 287 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1996, pet. ref'd); Blondett v. State, 921 S.W.2d 469, 474 (Tex.App.—Houston [14 th Dist.] 1996, pet. ref'd); Nolen v. State, 872 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1994, pet. ref'd). 1997See Nolen v. State, 872 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1994), pet. ref'd, 897 S.W.2d 789 (Tex.Crim.App.1995). | 3 | 3 |
Riley, Billy Dee Jr.green2 sentences2018Horne v. State Page 5 STANDARD OF REVIEW We review a trial court's denial of a motion for new trial for an abuse of discretion, and we will only reverse if the trial court's opinion was "clearly erroneous and arbitrary." Riley v. State, 378 S.W.3d 453, 457 (Tex. Crim. 2017STANDARD OF REVIEW We review a trial court’s ruling on a motion for new trial for an abuse of discretion, “reversing only if the trial judge’s opinion was clearly erroneous and arbitrary.” Riley v. State, 378 S.W.3d 453, 457 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 3 |
Troxel v. Granvillegreen2 sentences2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. [7] In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 547-48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982)). [8] Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978)). [9] Id. at 65-66, 120 S.Ct. at 2060 (citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 (1944)). [10] M.S., 115 S.W.3d a 2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. [7] In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 547-48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982)). [8] Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978)). [9] Id. at 65-66, 120 S.Ct. at 2060 (citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 (1944)). [10] M.S., 115 S.W.3d a | 2 | 3 |
Simms v. Stategreen2 sentences2023This recital shows that the trial court conducted an inquiry into Appellant’s ability to pay because “[r]ecitals contained in a judgment create a presumption of regularity and truthfulness, absent an affirmative showing to the contrary.” Simms v. State, 848 S.W.2d 754, 756 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, pet. ref’d) (citing Breazeale v. State, 683 S.W.2d 446 , 450–51 (Tex. Crim. 2022The trial court’s judgment recites the following: “After having conducted an inquiry into Defendant’s ability to pay, the Court ORDERS Defendant to pay the fines, court costs, [and] reimbursement fees.” This recital shows that the trial court conducted an inquiry into Ferguson’s ability to pay because “[r]ecitals contained in a judgment create a presumption of regularity and truthfulness, absent an affirmative showing to the contrary.” Simms v. State, 848 S.W.2d 754, 756 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, pet. 4 ref’d) (citing Breazeale v. State, 683 S.W.2d 446 , 450–51 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Ex Parte Hargettred2 sentences2021See Hargett, 819 S.W.2d at 868 . 2013See Ex parte Villanueva, 252 S.W.3d 391, 394 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) (noting that “a hearing held to determine whether a writ should issue or whether the merits of claims should be addressed is not the same as one that is held to resolve the merits of an applicant’s allegations”) (citing Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d at 868 ). | 2 | 2 |
Barnes v. Stategreen2 sentences2018Barnes v. State, 165 S.W.3d 75, 84 (Tex. App.—Austin 2005, no pet.).3 We overrule Appellant’s first issue. 2008See 165 S.W.3d at 84 . | 2 | 2 |
Loredana Bertolotti Gore v. Stategreen2 sentences2015In the instant case, the holding of the Panel conflicts with the holding of another panel in Gore v. State, 451 S.W.3d 182, 186 (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, no pet.), where the panel that once a defendant shows that search was warrantless, "the burden shifts to the State to prove the warrantless search was reasonable under the totality of the circumstances." The State can meet its burden by showing an exception to the warrant requirement. 2015In the instant case, the holding of the Panel conflicts with the holding of another panel in Gore v. State, 451 S.W.3d 182, 186 (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, no pet.), where the panel that once a defendant shows that search was warrantless, "the burden shifts to the State to prove the warrantless search was reasonable under the totality of the circumstances." The State can meet its burden by showing an exception to the warrant requirement. | 2 | 2 |
| Feldman v. Marksgreen | 2 | 2 |
| Dancy v. Daggettgreen | 2 | 2 |
| Faretta v. Californiagreen | 2 | 2 |
Lewelling v. Lewellinggreen2 sentences2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. [7] In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 547-48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982)). [8] Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978)). [9] Id. at 65-66, 120 S.Ct. at 2060 (citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 (1944)). [10] M.S., 115 S.W.3d a 2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. 7 … In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534 , 547–48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 , 758–59, 102 S. Ct. 1388 (1982)). 8 … Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S. Ct. 2054, 2060 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S. Ct. 549 (1978)). 6 In fact, it is “cardinal” that the custody, care, and nurture of a child reside in the parents.9 Both parent and child have a substantial interest in the justice of a decision affecting their ab | 1 | 3 |
In Re RRgreen2 sentences2008Unlike the evidence presented at the hearing in R.R. , 209 S.W.3d at 114 , here, no evidence, by affidavit or otherwise, was presented that Chad made a mistake in attempting to file an answer or that an accident prevented his filing. 2007See Milam v. Miller, 891 S.W.2d 1, 2 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1994, writ ref'd). [19] Chad's attorney filed a notice of appeal and motion for new trial, and requested and participated in a hearing on the motion for new trial, for indigence, and for frivolousness. [20] See In re R.R., 209 S.W.3d 112, 115 (Tex. 2006) ("some excuse, although not necessarily a good one, will suffice to show that a defendant's failure to file an answer was not because the defendant did not care"). [21] The trial court conducted a hearing on Chad's motion for new trial. | 1 | 3 |
Virgilio Avila & Univision Television Group, Inc. v. F.B. Larreagreen2 sentences2020See Avila v. Larrea, 394 S.W.3d 646, 656 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012, pet. denied) (statute requires that the court rule on the motion –4– within thirty days of hearing and either dismiss the action or not). 2020Id. at 652 . | 1 | 2 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2014We entered an order striking the brief of counsel and Appellant filed his brief raising three issues. 3 performance was “deficient.” Id. 1997See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). | 1 | 2 |
| Willie James Brown v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.green | 1 | 2 |
| Ex Parte Thompsongreen | 1 | 2 |
| Durham v. Zarcadesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Smith v. Mike Carlson Motor Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Garner v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Stoner v. Thompsongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Cooper v. Litton Loan Servicing, LPgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Henry v. Cash Biz, LPgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Gallo v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Miga v. Jensengreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Mooregreen | 1 | 1 |
| Johnson v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re WJBgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Issa v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Delafuente v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Kennamer v. ESTATE OF NOBLITTgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Safety-Kleen Corp. v. Garciagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Cardenas v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Michiana Easy Livin' Country, Inc. v. Holtengreen | 1 | 1 |
| In re Mesa Petroleum Partners, LPgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Sanders v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Joshua Reynolds v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martinez v. State
green
2 sentences1974Prior to trial the court conducted a hearing in the jury's absence to determine the admissibility of the identification testimony of the complainants as recommended in Martinez v. State, 437 S.W.2d 842 (Tex. Cr.App.1969). 1974In compliance with Martinez v. State, 437 S.W.2d 842 (Tex.Cr.App.1969), the trial court conducted a hearing outside the presence of the jury and found that the pretrial photographic identification by the boys did not taint their in-court identification of appellant. | 5 | 1971–1974 |
Santosky v. Kramer
green
2 sentences2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. [7] In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 547-48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982)). [8] Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978)). [9] Id. at 65-66, 120 S.Ct. at 2060 (citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 (1944)). [10] M.S., 115 S.W.3d a 2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. [7] In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 547-48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982)). [8] Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978)). [9] Id. at 65-66, 120 S.Ct. at 2060 (citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 (1944)). [10] M.S., 115 S.W.3d a | 4 | 2009–2009 |
Franks v. Delaware
green
2 sentences2019Statements Excised from the Affidavit At trial, and before allowing the blood sample to be entered into evidence, the trial court conducted a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware , 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978), to address Appellant's contention that the search warrant was issued on the basis of falsified statements in Officer Harrison's affidavit. 2019Statements Excised from the Affidavit At trial, and before allowing the blood sample to be entered into evidence, the trial court conducted a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware , 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978), to address Appellant's contention that the search warrant was issued on the basis of falsified statements in Officer Harrison's affidavit. | 3 | 2016–2019 |
Prince v. Massachusetts
green
2 sentences2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. [7] In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 547-48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982)). [8] Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978)). [9] Id. at 65-66, 120 S.Ct. at 2060 (citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 (1944)). [10] M.S., 115 S.W.3d a 2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. [7] In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 547-48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982)). [8] Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978)). [9] Id. at 65-66, 120 S.Ct. at 2060 (citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 (1944)). [10] M.S., 115 S.W.3d a | 3 | 2009–2009 |
Quilloin v. Walcott
green
2 sentences2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. [7] In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 547-48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982)). [8] Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978)). [9] Id. at 65-66, 120 S.Ct. at 2060 (citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 (1944)). [10] M.S., 115 S.W.3d a 2009The trial court conducted a hearing on that motion on January 29, 2009, and denied the motion by written order on February 6, 2009. [7] In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 547-48 (Tex. 2003) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 758-59 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982)). [8] Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 , 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060 , 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (citing Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246, 255 , 98 S.Ct. 549 , 54 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978)). [9] Id. at 65-66, 120 S.Ct. at 2060 (citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 , 64 S.Ct. 438 , 88 L.Ed. 645 (1944)). [10] M.S., 115 S.W.3d a | 3 | 2009–2009 |
Rodriguez v. State
green
2 sentences2002Appellant's objection was premised on Rodriguez v. State , 802 S.W.2d 716 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1990, aff'd as reformed , 819 S.W.2d 871 (Tex. Crim. 2002Appellant's objection was premised on Rodriguez v. State , 802 S.W.2d 716 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1990, aff'd as reformed , 819 S.W.2d 871 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 2002–2002 |
Rodriguez v. State
green
2 sentences2002Appellant's objection was premised on Rodriguez v. State , 802 S.W.2d 716 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1990, aff'd as reformed , 819 S.W.2d 871 (Tex. Crim. 2002Appellant's objection was premised on Rodriguez v. State , 802 S.W.2d 716 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1990, aff'd as reformed , 819 S.W.2d 871 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 2002–2002 |
Crawford v. Washington
green
2 sentences2024At punishment, the trial court conducted a hearing outside the presence of the jury at which appellant’s counsel made a “Crawford3 confrontation clause objection” regarding two SANE nurses who were going to testify “about some hearsay statements from some other alleged victims of aggravated sexual assault, with the 3 In Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), the court held that the out-of-court statements by witnesses that are testimonial in nature are barred, under the Confrontation Clause, unless the witnesses are available at trial, or if unavailable, the defendants had a prior opportu 2015The trial court overruled Appellant’s objection based on Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 59 , 124 S.Ct. 1354, 1369 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). | 2 | 2015–2024 |
Thompson v. State
green
2 sentences2023“A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id. -8- 04-22-00197-CR In this case, the trial court conducted a hearing on Cantu’s motion for new trial at which several witness, including trial counsel, testified. 2015Although counsel offered insight into his actions, an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim must be analyzed from the perspective of counsel at the time he acted and without the “deleterious effects of hindsight.” Id. at 813 . | 2 | 2015–2023 |
Breazeale v. State
green
2 sentences2023This recital shows that the trial court conducted an inquiry into Appellant’s ability to pay because “[r]ecitals contained in a judgment create a presumption of regularity and truthfulness, absent an affirmative showing to the contrary.” Simms v. State, 848 S.W.2d 754, 756 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, pet. ref’d) (citing Breazeale v. State, 683 S.W.2d 446 , 450–51 (Tex. Crim. 2022The trial court’s judgment recites the following: “After having conducted an inquiry into Defendant’s ability to pay, the Court ORDERS Defendant to pay the fines, court costs, [and] reimbursement fees.” This recital shows that the trial court conducted an inquiry into Ferguson’s ability to pay because “[r]ecitals contained in a judgment create a presumption of regularity and truthfulness, absent an affirmative showing to the contrary.” Simms v. State, 848 S.W.2d 754, 756 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, pet. 4 ref’d) (citing Breazeale v. State, 683 S.W.2d 446 , 450–51 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2022–2023 |
Wiley, Sam Jr.
green
2 sentences2021Id. 2018Id. | 2 | 2018–2021 |
Anders v. California
green
2 sentences2019In April 2018, the trial court conducted a hearing so Grubbs could 2 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. 2002Upon the State’s motion to revoke community supervision alleging three violations of the terms and 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). 2 conditions thereof, the trial court conducted a hearing on April 29, 2002. | 2 | 2002–2019 |
Greenberg v. Brookshire
green
2 sentences2015Greenberg, 640 S.W.2d at 872 . 2015Greenberg, 640 S.W.2d 870 (parties to lawsuit were husband and wife). | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Casey v. State
green
2 sentences2013Casey , 215 S.W.3d at 879 . 2013Casey, 215 S.W.3d at 879 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Shaw v. State
green
2 sentences2012Id. 2012Id. | 2 | 2012–2012 |
| Batson v. Kentucky green | 2 | 1992–2009 |
| Booker v. State green | 2 | 2005–2005 |
| State v. Read green | 2 | 2001–2001 |
| Thompson v. State green | 2 | 1974–1982 |
| Johnson v. State green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| In Re Labatt Food Service, L.P. green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| Perry Homes v. Cull green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| Berry v. Berry green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| Weatherred v. State green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| Etan Industries, Inc. v. Lehmann green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| Rivers v. Charlie Thomas Ford, Ltd. green | 1 | 2023–2023 |
| Jackson v. State green | 1 | 2022–2022 |
| State v. Martinez green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| High v. State green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| Powell v. State green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| George Alexander D/B/A Zentner's Daughter Steakhouse v. Lynda's Boutique green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| United States v. David L. Hicks green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| in Re Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson), LLC green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| McQuarrie v. State green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| London v. Chandler green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| Solar Applications Engineering, Inc. v. T.A. Operating Corp. green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.