120 Montana opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2026 17 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Montana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2025This Court applies the test from Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 (1984), which requires the defendant “show not only that his counsel’s performance was deficient, but that the deficient performance was prejudicial to the defendant.” Morgan, ¶ 9 (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687 , 104 S. Ct. at 2064 ). ¶36 Prior to ruling on whether the defendant has satisfied the Strickland test, the Court must determine whether a direct appeal is the proper forum for the ineffective assistance of counsel claim. 2025This Court applies the test from Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 (1984), which requires the defendant “show not only that his counsel’s performance was deficient, but that the deficient performance was prejudicial to the defendant.” Morgan, ¶ 9 (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687 , 104 S. Ct. at 2064 ). ¶36 Prior to ruling on whether the defendant has satisfied the Strickland test, the Court must determine whether a direct appeal is the proper forum for the ineffective assistance of counsel claim. | 10 | 40 |
Whitlow v. Stategreen2 sentences2025To determine whether counsel’s performance was deficient, we must determine “whether counsel’s conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness measured under prevailing professional norms and in light of the surrounding circumstances.” Robinson, ¶ 28 (quoting Whitlow v. State, 2008 MT 140, ¶ 20 , 343 Mont. 90 , 183 P.3d 861 ). ¶61 When considering whether to review an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal, we first must determine whether the claim is based on the trial record. 2025To determine whether counsel’s performance was deficient, we must determine “whether counsel’s conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness measured under prevailing professional norms and in light of the surrounding circumstances.” Robinson, ¶ 28 (quoting Whitlow v. State, 2008 MT 140, ¶ 20 , 343 Mont. 90 , 183 P.3d 861 ). ¶61 When considering whether to review an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal, we first must determine whether the claim is based on the trial record. | 4 | 15 |
Hagen v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Gunderson , ¶ 70 (citing Hagen v. State, 1999 MT 8, ¶ 11 , 293 Mont. 60 , 973 P.2d 233 ). 2010Gunderson , ¶ 70 (citing Hagen v. State, 1999 MT 8, ¶ 11 , 293 Mont. 60 , 973 P.2d 233 ). | 4 | 5 |
State v. Whitlowgreen2 sentences2003See State v. Whitlow, 2001 MT 208, ¶ 17 , 306 Mont. 339, ¶ 17 , 33 P.3d 877, ¶ 17 . ¶18 Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are mixed questions of law and fact. 2003See State v. Whitlow, 2001 MT 208, ¶ 17 , 306 Mont. 339, ¶ 17 , 33 P.3d 877, ¶ 17 . ¶18 Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are mixed questions of law and fact. | 2 | 2 |
Adams v. Stategreen2 sentences2017“A defendant must satisfy both prongs of this test in order to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.” Whitlow, ¶ 11 (citing Adams v. State, 2007 MT 35, ¶ 22 , 336 Mont. 63 , 153 P.3d 601 ). 2017“A defendant must satisfy both prongs of this test in order to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.” Whitlow, ¶ 11 (citing Adams v. State, 2007 MT 35, ¶ 22 , 336 Mont. 63 , 153 P.3d 601 ). | 1 | 10 |
State v. Kouglgreen2 sentences2013She further argues that defense counsel’s failure to ensure the confidentiality of an expert witness, to object to late disclosure of a new expert by the prosecution, to stipulate to serious bodily injury, to object to victim impact testimony, and to timely object to the prosecution’s closing arguments constitutes ineffective assistance and denied her a fair trial. ¶65 A defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and by Article II, § 24 of the Montana Constitution. ‘Before reaching the merits of a 2013She further argues that defense counsel’s failure to ensure the confidentiality of an expert witness, to object to late disclosure of a new expert by the prosecution, to stipulate to serious bodily injury, to object to victim impact testimony, and to timely object to the prosecution’s closing arguments constitutes ineffective assistance and denied her a fair trial. ¶65 A defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and by Article II, § 24 of the Montana Constitution. ‘Before reaching the merits of a | 1 | 4 |
A. Oliphant v. Stategreen2 sentences2024Oliphant v. State, 2023 MT 43, ¶¶ 29, 37 , 411 Mont. 250 , 525 P.3d 1214 . 2024Oliphant v. State, 2023 MT 43, ¶¶ 29, 37 , 411 Mont. 250 , 525 P.3d 1214 . | 1 | 2 |
Scott Heddings v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Heddings v. State, 2011 MT 228, ¶ 33 , 362 Mont. 90 , 265 P.3d 600 (holding that an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim “will not succeed when predicated upon counsel’s failure to make motions or objections which, under the circumstances, would have been frivolous, . . . without procedural or substantive merit, or . . . would likely not have changed the outcome of the proceeding”). ¶11 Finally, House contends that his counsel was ineffective for not filing a notice of appeal. 2015See Heddings v. State, 2011 MT 228, ¶ 33 , 362 Mont. 90 , 265 P.3d 600 (holding that an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim “will not succeed when predicated upon counsel’s failure to make motions or objections which, under the circumstances, would have been frivolous, . . . without procedural or substantive merit, or . . . would likely not have changed the outcome of the proceeding”). ¶11 Finally, House contends that his counsel was ineffective for not filing a notice of appeal. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Turnsplentygreen2 sentences2004John , ¶ 38. ¶32 This Court may review an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal “when the record ... fully explain[s] why counsel took, or failed to take, action in providing a defense for the accused....“ State v. Turnsplenty, 2003 MT 159, ¶ 17 , 316 Mont. 275, ¶ 17 , 70 P.3d 1234, ¶ 17 . 2004John , ¶ 38. ¶32 This Court may review an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal “when the record ... fully explain[s] why counsel took, or failed to take, action in providing a defense for the accused....“ State v. Turnsplenty, 2003 MT 159, ¶ 17 , 316 Mont. 275, ¶ 17 , 70 P.3d 1234, ¶ 17 . | 1 | 2 |
Dawson v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Dawson v. State, 2000 MT 219, ¶ 21 , 301 Mont. 135, ¶ 21 , 10 P.3d 49, ¶ 21 . ¶11 With these legal precepts in mind, we turn to Morgan’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. 2003Dawson v. State, 2000 MT 219, ¶ 21 , 301 Mont. 135, ¶ 21 , 10 P.3d 49, ¶ 21 . ¶11 With these legal precepts in mind, we turn to Morgan’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. | 1 | 2 |
Hill v. Lockhartgreen2 sentences1997Hill, 474 U.S. at 59 ; State v. Johnson (1995), 274 Mont. 124, 130 , 907 P.2d 150, 154 . 1997Hill, 474 U.S. at 59 , 106 S.Ct. at 370-71 ; State v. Johnson (1995), 274 Mont. 124, 130 , 907 P.2d 150, 154 . *411 Where “a defendant is represented by counsel during the plea process and enters his plea upon the advice of counsel, the voluntariness of the plea depends on whether counsel’s advice ‘was within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.’ ” Hill, 474 U.S. at 56 , 106 S.Ct. at 369 (citation omitted). | 1 | 2 |
| State v. Seitzingergreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re JJLgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Hamiltongreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Normandygreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re CMCgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Missouri v. Fryegreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Asgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Matter of C.C. C.J. C.M.C.green | 1 | 1 |
| cluster 587351green | 1 | 1 |
| cluster 792429green | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Savagegreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Finleygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Montana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kougl
green
2 sentences2013She further argues that defense counsel’s failure to ensure the confidentiality of an expert witness, to object to late disclosure of a new expert by the prosecution, to stipulate to serious bodily injury, to object to victim impact testimony, and to timely object to the prosecution’s closing arguments constitutes ineffective assistance and denied her a fair trial. ¶65 A defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and by Article II, § 24 of the Montana Constitution. ‘Before reaching the merits of a 2005A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome, but it does not require that a defendant demonstrate that he would have been acquitted.” State v. Kougl, 2004 MT 243, ¶ 25 , 323 Mont. 6, ¶ 25 , 97 P.3d 1095, ¶ 25 (quotations and citations omitted). ¶53 Before examining an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal, we generally look to the record to see whether we can answer “why’ counsel did or did not perform as alleged. | 4 | 2005–2025 |
State v. Fields
green
2 sentences2020State v. Fields, 2002 MT 84, ¶ 31 , 309 Mont. 300 , 46 P.3d 612 . 2020State v. Fields, 2002 MT 84, ¶ 31 , 309 Mont. 300 , 46 P.3d 612 . | 4 | 2001–2020 |
State v. Jefferson
green
2 sentences2004J.C. also alleges that his counsel did not assure that J.C. understood his right to sentence review. ¶23 In support of these arguments, J.C. cites State v. Jefferson, 2003 MT 90 , 315 Mont. 146 , 69 P.3d 641 , for the proposition that “[w]hen an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based on facts of record, it is properly raised on direct appeal. 2004J.C. also alleges that his counsel did not assure that J.C. understood his right to sentence review. ¶23 In support of these arguments, J.C. cites State v. Jefferson, 2003 MT 90 , 315 Mont. 146 , 69 P.3d 641 , for the proposition that “[w]hen an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based on facts of record, it is properly raised on direct appeal. | 4 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Jefferson
green
2 sentences2004J.C. also alleges that his counsel did not assure that J.C. understood his right to sentence review. ¶23 In support of these arguments, J.C. cites State v. Jefferson, 2003 MT 90 , 315 Mont. 146 , 69 P.3d 641 , for the proposition that “[w]hen an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based on facts of record, it is properly raised on direct appeal. 2004J.C. also alleges that his counsel did not assure that J.C. understood his right to sentence review. ¶ 23 In support of these arguments, J.C. cites State v. Jefferson, 2003 MT 90 , 315 Mont. 146 , 69 P.3d 641 , for the proposition that "[w]hen an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based on facts of record, it is properly raised on direct appeal. | 4 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Danny Sartain
green
2 sentences2016Sartain v. State, 2012 MT 164, ¶ 9 , 365 Mont. 483 , 285 P.3d 407 . 2016Sartain v. State, 2012 MT 164, ¶ 9 , 365 Mont. 483 , 285 P.3d 407 . | 3 | 2015–2016 |
State v. Harris
green
2 sentences2010And, as to the second part of the test, we have stated that “[a] reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Crosley , ¶ 55 (quoting State v. Harris, 2001 MT 231, ¶ 19 , 306 Mont. 525 , 36 P.3d 372 , overruled in part by Robinson v. State, 2010 MT 108 , 356 Mont. 282 , 232 P.3d 403 ). ¶55 Before this Court may reach the merits of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal, we must determine whether the allegations are properly before us. 2010And, as to the second part of the test, we have stated that “[a] reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Crosley , ¶ 55 (quoting State v. Harris, 2001 MT 231, ¶ 19 , 306 Mont. 525 , 36 P.3d 372 , overruled in part by Robinson v. State, 2010 MT 108 , 356 Mont. 282 , 232 P.3d 403 ). ¶55 Before this Court may reach the merits of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal, we must determine whether the allegations are properly before us. | 3 | 2004–2010 |
Riggs v. State
green
2 sentences2024Riggs v. State, 2011 MT 239, ¶ 53 , 362 Mont. 140 , 264 P.3d 693 (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S. Ct. at 2052 ). 2024Riggs v. State, 2011 MT 239, ¶ 53 , 362 Mont. 140 , 264 P.3d 693 (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S. Ct. at 2052 ). | 2 | 2013–2024 |
State v. Andress
neutral
2 sentences2014Tellegen argues that the instruction on “purposely” incorrectly defined it as a conduct-based mental state when the instruction for accountability calls for a result-based mental state. ¶19 In State v. Andress, 2013 MT 12 , 368 Mont. 248 , ___P.3d___, we considered an ineffective assistance of counsel claim where the defendant’s attorney submitted instructions defining “purposely” as a conduct-based rather than result-based mental state. 2014Tellegen argues that the instruction on “purposely” incorrectly defined it as a conduct-based mental state when the instruction for accountability calls for a result-based mental state. ¶19 In State v. Andress, 2013 MT 12 , 368 Mont. 248 , ___P.3d___, we considered an ineffective assistance of counsel claim where the defendant’s attorney submitted instructions defining “purposely” as a conduct-based rather than result-based mental state. | 2 | 2013–2014 |
In re A.D.B.
green
2 sentences2013The District Court concluded Mother’s attorney was “an excellent lawyer,” was “probably the most experienced attorney that would be available for this proceeding,” and had done “a good job so far.” Moreover, we note that “a parent may not sustain an ineffective assistance of counsel claim when the parent cannot demonstrate prejudice as a result of the ineffective assistance.” In re A.D.B., 2013 MT 167, ¶ 64 , 370 Mont. 422 , 305 P.3d 739 . 2013The District Court concluded Mother’s attorney was “an excellent lawyer,” was “probably the most experienced attorney that would be available for this proceeding,” and had done “a good job so far.” Moreover, we note that “a parent may not sustain an ineffective assistance of counsel claim when the parent cannot demonstrate prejudice as a result of the ineffective assistance.” In re A.D.B., 2013 MT 167, ¶ 64 , 370 Mont. 422 , 305 P.3d 739 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Upshaw
green
2 sentences2013She further argues that defense counsel’s failure to ensure the confidentiality of an expert witness, to object to late disclosure of a new expert by the prosecution, to stipulate to serious bodily injury, to object to victim impact testimony, and to timely object to the prosecution’s closing arguments constitutes ineffective assistance and denied her a fair trial. ¶65 A defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and by Article II, § 24 of the Montana Constitution. ‘Before reaching the merits of a 2013She further argues that defense counsel’s failure to ensure the confidentiality of an expert witness, to object to late disclosure of a new expert by the prosecution, to stipulate to serious bodily injury, to object to victim impact testimony, and to timely object to the prosecution’s closing arguments constitutes ineffective assistance and denied her a fair trial. ¶65 A defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and by Article II, § 24 of the Montana Constitution. ‘Before reaching the merits of a | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Matter of A.D.B. YINC.
green
2 sentences2013The District Court concluded Mother’s attorney was “an excellent lawyer,” was “probably the most experienced attorney that would be available for this proceeding,” and had done “a good job so far.” Moreover, we note that “a parent may not sustain an ineffective assistance of counsel claim when the parent cannot demonstrate prejudice as a result of the ineffective assistance.” In re A.D.B., 2013 MT 167, ¶ 64 , 370 Mont. 422 , 305 P.3d 739 . 2013The District Court concluded Mother’s attorney was “an excellent lawyer,” was “probably the most experienced attorney that would be available for this proceeding,” and had done “a good job so far.” Moreover, we note that “a parent may not sustain an ineffective assistance of counsel claim when the parent cannot demonstrate prejudice as a result of the ineffective assistance.” In re A.D.B., 2013 MT 167, ¶ 64 , 370 Mont. 422 , 305 P.3d 739 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
State v. White
green
2 sentences2006As stated in State v. White, 2001 MT 149, ¶ 12 , 306 Mont. 58, ¶ 12 , 30 P.3d 340, ¶ 12 , Where ineffective assistance of counsel claims are based on facts of record in the underlying case, they must be raised in the direct appeal and, conversely, where the allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be documented from the record in the underlying case, those claims must be raised by petition for pos(conviction relief. ¶ 10 Swan contends he could not have raised this ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal because the claim is dependent on facts not of record in th 2006As stated in State v. White, 2001 MT 149, ¶ 12 , 306 Mont. 58, ¶ 12 , 30 P.3d 340, ¶ 12 , Where ineffective assistance of counsel claims are based on facts of record in the underlying case, they must be raised in the direct appeal and, conversely, where the allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be documented from the record in the underlying case, those claims must be raised by petition for pos(conviction relief. ¶ 10 Swan contends he could not have raised this ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal because the claim is dependent on facts not of record in th | 2 | 2006–2008 |
State v. Morgan
green
2 sentences2008We have held that “[wjhen it is possible to dispose of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on the claim’s failure to establish that the defendant was sufficiently prejudiced, it is best to follow that course.” State v. Morgan, 2003 MT 193, ¶ 10 , 316 Mont. 509, ¶ 10 , 74 P.3d 1047, ¶ 10 . 2008We have held that “[wjhen it is possible to dispose of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on the claim’s failure to establish that the defendant was sufficiently prejudiced, it is best to follow that course.” State v. Morgan, 2003 MT 193, ¶ 10 , 316 Mont. 509, ¶ 10 , 74 P.3d 1047, ¶ 10 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Hendricks
green
2 sentences2005State v. Hendricks, 2003 MT 223, ¶ 12 , 317 Mont. 177, ¶ 12 , 75 P.3d 1268, ¶ 12 . ¶23 Whether the District Court abused its discretion in denying Novak’s motion for a mistrial. ¶24 Novak argues that the District Court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial. 2005State v. Hendricks, 2003 MT 223, ¶ 12 , 317 Mont. 177, ¶ 12 , 75 P.3d 1268, ¶ 12 . ¶23 Whether the District Court abused its discretion in denying Novak’s motion for a mistrial. ¶24 Novak argues that the District Court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Hagen
green
2 sentences2004State v. Hagen, 2002 MT 190, ¶ 18 , 311 Mont. 117, ¶ 18 , 53 P.3d 885, ¶ 18 . ¶16 Normally, the record on appeal must adequately document why counsel acted in a particular manner before this Court will review an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal. 2004State v. Hagen, 2002 MT 190, ¶ 18 , 311 Mont. 117, ¶ 18 , 53 P.3d 885, ¶ 18 . ¶16 Normally, the record on appeal must adequately document why counsel acted in a particular manner before this Court will review an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Rose
green
2 sentences2003Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 ; State v. Rose, 1998 MT 342, ¶ 12 , 292 Mont. 350, ¶ 12 , 972 P.2d 321, ¶ 12 . 2003Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 ; State v. Rose, 1998 MT 342, ¶ 12 , 292 Mont. 350, ¶ 12 , 972 P.2d 321, ¶ 12 . | 2 | 2001–2003 |
State v. Hagen
green
2 sentences2001Hagen I, 273 Mont. at 440, 903 P.2d at 1386 . 2001Hagen I, 273 Mont. at 440, 903 P.2d at 1386 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Kills on Top v. State
green
2 sentences2001Hans v. State (1997), 283 Mont. 379, 393 , 942 P.2d 674, 683 ; Lester Kills On Top v. State (1995), 273 Mont. 32, 49 , 901 P.2d 1368, 1379 . ¶12 Before reaching the merits of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a postconviction relief proceeding it is necessary to determine whether such a claim is properly before the Court or whether the claim is procedurally barred. 2001Hans v. State (1997), 283 Mont. 379, 393 , 942 P.2d 674, 683 ; Lester Kills On Top v. State (1995), 273 Mont. 32, 49 , 901 P.2d 1368, 1379 . ¶12 Before reaching the merits of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a postconviction relief proceeding it is necessary to determine whether such a claim is properly before the Court or whether the claim is procedurally barred. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
| State v. Senn green | 2 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences1997Hill, 474 U.S. at 59 ; State v. Johnson (1995), 274 Mont. 124, 130 , 907 P.2d 150, 154 . 1997Hill, 474 U.S. at 59 ; State v. Johnson (1995), 274 Mont. 124, 130 , 907 P.2d 150, 154 . | 2 | 1997–1997 |
| State v. Johnson green | 2 | 1995–1996 |
| State v. Sheppard green | 2 | 1995–1996 |
| State v. Kalem Johnston green | 1 | 2026–2026 |
| State v. Wilson green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| State v. Lawrence green | 1 | 2023–2023 |
| State v. Trull green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| State v. D. Schowengerdt green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| State v. Jared Williams neutral | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| State v. Nevada R. Ugalde green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| State v. Garding green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| State v. Aker green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| State v. Sawyer neutral | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| State v. David Kime green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Pequeno v. Schmidt green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| In re A.S. green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| State v. Lane green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| State v. Johnson green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Martin v. United States green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Hollingsworth v. United States green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| State v. B. Thompson green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.