8 Virgin Islands opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virgin Islands courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Elmour v. Government of the Virgin Islandsgreen1 sentence2026See Elmour v. Gov’t of the V.I., 54 V.I. 740, 748 (D.V.I. | 1 | 1 |
State v. ANJgreen1 sentence2013See, e.g., Prowell v. State, 741 N.E.2d 704, 716-17 (Ind. 2001) (defender’s representation that caseload violated limits applicable to capital cases did not make new trial appropriate remedy); State v. A.N.J., 168 Wn.2d 91 , 225 P.3d 956, 965 (2010) (“[Professional standards do not establish minimum Sixth Amendment standards.”); State v. Harrington, No. 41193-8-II, 2012 Wash. App. LEXIS 2126 , *5 n.4 (Wash. Ct. App. Sept. 11, 2012) (unpublished) (“While prescribing caseload management techniques and annual limits, the Supreme Court’s Standards for Indigent Defense provide no guidance for when | 1 | 1 |
cluster 750665green1 sentence2013LaGrand v. Stewart, 133 F.3d 1253, 1275 (9th Cir. 1998). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Andersongreen1 sentence2013See, e.g., United States v. Anderson, 570 F.3d 1025 , 1032 n.4 (8th Cir. 2009) (“We will consider an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal only in exceptional cases where the district court has developed a record on the ineffectiveness issue or where the result would otherwise be a plain miscarriage of justice. | 1 | 1 |
Prowell v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See, e.g., Prowell v. State, 741 N.E.2d 704, 716-17 (Ind. 2001) (defender’s representation that caseload violated limits applicable to capital cases did not make new trial appropriate remedy); State v. A.N.J., 168 Wn.2d 91 , 225 P.3d 956, 965 (2010) (“[Professional standards do not establish minimum Sixth Amendment standards.”); State v. Harrington, No. 41193-8-II, 2012 Wash. App. LEXIS 2126 , *5 n.4 (Wash. Ct. App. Sept. 11, 2012) (unpublished) (“While prescribing caseload management techniques and annual limits, the Supreme Court’s Standards for Indigent Defense provide no guidance for when | 1 | 1 |
Eugene Rice v. Ronald C. Marshallgreen1 sentence2012Thomas v. Varner, 428 F.3d 491, 500 (3d Cir. 2005) (citing Rice v. Marshall, 816 F.2d 1126, 1132 (6th Cir. 1987)). | 1 | 1 |
Clayton Thomas v. Ben Varner the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvaniagreen2 sentences2012See Thomas v. Varner, 428 F.3d 491, 500-01 (3d Cir. 2005) and United States v. Pungitore, 15 F.Supp.2d 705, 729 (E.D. 2012Thomas v. Varner, 428 F.3d 491, 500 (3d Cir. 2005) (citing Rice v. Marshall, 816 F.2d 1126, 1132 (6th Cir. 1987)). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Pungitoregreen1 sentence2012See Thomas v. Varner, 428 F.3d 491, 500-01 (3d Cir. 2005) and United States v. Pungitore, 15 F.Supp.2d 705, 729 (E.D. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virgin Islands. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2014The trial judge opined that Hughley failed to meet his burden of proving ineffective assistance of counsel under the holding of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. 2014The trial judge opined that Hughley failed to meet his burden of proving ineffective assistance of counsel under the holding of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. | 2 | 2007–2014 |
State v. A.N.J.
green
1 sentence2013See, e.g., Prowell v. State, 741 N.E.2d 704, 716-17 (Ind. 2001) (defender’s representation that caseload violated limits applicable to capital cases did not make new trial appropriate remedy); State v. A.N.J., 168 Wn.2d 91 , 225 P.3d 956, 965 (2010) (“[Professional standards do not establish minimum Sixth Amendment standards.”); State v. Harrington, No. 41193-8-II, 2012 Wash. App. LEXIS 2126 , *5 n.4 (Wash. Ct. App. Sept. 11, 2012) (unpublished) (“While prescribing caseload management techniques and annual limits, the Supreme Court’s Standards for Indigent Defense provide no guidance for when | 1 | 2013–2013 |
United States v. Tony R. Jake, A/K/A Smiley
green
1 sentence2012United States v. Jake, 281 F.3d 123 , 132 n.7 (3d Cir. 2002). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Rivera v. Government of the Virgin Islands
green
2 sentences2011“Ordinarily, a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel is not appropriately reviewed for the first time on direct appeal . . . because the necessary facts about counsel’s representation of the defendant have not been developed.” Rivera v. Gov’t of the V.I., 981 F. Supp. 893, 900 , 37 V.I. 68 (D.V.I. 2011“Ordinarily, a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel is not appropriately reviewed for the first time on direct appeal . . . because the necessary facts about counsel’s representation of the defendant have not been developed.” Rivera v. Gov’t of the V.I., 981 F. Supp. 893, 900 , 37 V.I. 68 (D.V.I. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.