Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Alabama opinions name it 4 courts 1930–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Crews v. HOUSTON CTY. DEPT. OF PENSIONS & SEC.green2 sentences2025Dep't of Pensions & Sec., 358 So. 2d 451, 455 (Ala. Civ. 2005“Moreover, procedural due process contemplates the basic requirements of a fair proceeding including an impartial hearing before a legally constituted -court; an opportunity to present evi dence and arguments; information regarding the claims of the opposing party; a reasonable opportunity to controvert the opposition’s claims; and representation by counsel if it is desired.” Crews v. Houston County Dep’t of Pensions & Sec., 358 So.2d 451, 455 (Ala.Civ.App.1978) (emphasis added). | 7 | 10 |
Julia A. Strain v. Arnold Ray Maloy.green2 sentences2015Dep’t of Pensions & Sec., 358 So.2d 451, 455 (Ala.Civ.App.1978) (emphasis added).” ‘“83 So.3d at 571.’” N.J.D., 110 So.3d at 390 -91 (quoting Gilmore v. Gilmore, 103 So.3d 833, 835 (Ala.Civ.App.2012)). 2013Dep’t of Pensions & Sec., 358 So.2d 451, 455 (Ala.Civ.App.1978) (emphasis added).’ “83 So.3d at 571.” Gilmore v. Gilmore, 103 So.3d 833, 834-35 (Ala.Civ.App.2012). | 3 | 4 |
Gilmore v. Gilmoregreen2 sentences2015See N.J.D., 110 So.3d at 391 (“ ‘ “ ‘[Procedural due process contemplates the basic requirements of a fair proceeding including an impartial hearing before a legally constituted court; an opportunity to present evidence and arguments; information regarding the claims of the opposing party; a reasonable opportunity to controvert the opposition’s claims; and representation by counsel if it is desired.’” (quoting Gilmore, 103 So.3d at 835 , quoting in turn other cases)). 2015Dep’t of Pensions & Sec., 358 So.2d 451, 455 (Ala.Civ.App.1978) (emphasis added).” ‘“83 So.3d at 571.’” N.J.D., 110 So.3d at 390 -91 (quoting Gilmore v. Gilmore, 103 So.3d 833, 835 (Ala.Civ.App.2012)). | 3 | 4 |
Danford v. Dupreegreen2 sentences2002See Danford v. Dupree , 272 Ala. 517 , 132 So.2d 734 (1961); Almon v. Morgan County , 245 Ala. 241 , 16 So.2d 511 (1944); Thorne v. Thorne , supra ; In re Welfare of Luscier , supra . 2002See Danford v. Dupree , 272 Ala. 517 , 132 So.2d 734 (1961); Almon v. Morgan County , 245 Ala. 241 , 16 So.2d 511 (1944); Thorne v. Thorne , supra ; In re Welfare of Luscier , supra . | 2 | 2 |
N.J.D. v. Madison County Department of Human Resourcesgreen2 sentences2015See N.J.D., 110 So.3d at 391 (“ ‘ “ ‘[Procedural due process contemplates the basic requirements of a fair proceeding including an impartial hearing before a legally constituted court; an opportunity to present evidence and arguments; information regarding the claims of the opposing party; a reasonable opportunity to controvert the opposition’s claims; and representation by counsel if it is desired.’” (quoting Gilmore, 103 So.3d at 835 , quoting in turn other cases)). 2015Dep’t of Pensions & Sec., 358 So.2d 451, 455 (Ala.Civ.App.1978) (emphasis added).” ‘“83 So.3d at 571.’” N.J.D., 110 So.3d at 390 -91 (quoting Gilmore v. Gilmore, 103 So.3d 833, 835 (Ala.Civ.App.2012)). | 1 | 2 |
R.C. v. L.C.green1 sentence2011Dep’t of Pensions & Sec., 358 So.2d 451, 455 (Ala.Civ.App.1978) (emphasis added); see also R.C. v. L.C., 923 So.2d 1109, 1111-12 (Ala.Civ.App.2005). | 1 | 1 |
In Matter of Stewartgreen1 sentence2005This court has stated that “[t]he fundamental requirement of due process is the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.” In re Stewart, 481 So.2d 899, 901 (Ala.Civ.App.1985). | 1 | 1 |
Arnett v. Kennedygreen2 sentences2000Id. at 137 , 94 S.Ct. 1633 . 2000Id. at 137. | 1 | 1 |
Mahan v. Stategreen1 sentence1988Mahan v. State, 508 So.2d 1180, 1184 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Almon v. Morgan County
green
2 sentences2002See Danford v. Dupree , 272 Ala. 517 , 132 So.2d 734 (1961); Almon v. Morgan County , 245 Ala. 241 , 16 So.2d 511 (1944); Thorne v. Thorne , supra ; In re Welfare of Luscier , supra . 2002See Danford v. Dupree , 272 Ala. 517 , 132 So.2d 734 (1961); Almon v. Morgan County , 245 Ala. 241 , 16 So.2d 511 (1944); Thorne v. Thorne , supra ; In re Welfare of Luscier , supra . | 2 | 1978–2002 |
Channell v. State
green
1 sentence1987The facts of this case are very similar to those of Channell v. State, 477 So.2d 522 (Ala.Cr.App.1985), wherein the court twice sent the jury back for further deliberations and the appellant, as in the instant case, claimed that if the jury was in fact split 11-1, then the court's actions improperly suggested to the jury that the one holdout should conform to the will of the majority. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Thorne v. Thorne
green
1 sentence1978See Danford v. Dupree , 272 Ala. 517 , 132 So.2d 734 (1961); Almon v. Morgan County , 245 Ala. 241 , 16 So.2d 511 (1944); Thorne v. Thorne, supra; In re Welfare of Luscier, supra. Thus, the safeguards mandated by due process entitled a parent to the right of counsel in a permanent child deprivation proceeding. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Blackwell v. State
green
2 sentences1930The rule is thus expressed by the Supreme Court of Florida in Blackwell v. State, 76 Fla. 124 , 79 So. 731, 737 , 1 A. L. 1930The rule is thus expressed by the Supreme Court of Florida in Blackwell v. State, 76 Fla. 124 , 79 So. 731, 737 , 1 A. L. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.