impartial hearing (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

impartial hearing in Connecticut

12 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1961–1997 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Catino v. Board of Educationgreen
conn · 1978 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1983–1996
2 sentences

1996The board of education shall give the teacher concerned its written decision within fifteen days of receipt of the written recommendation of the impartial hearing panel, subcommittee or hearing officer." Thus, the statute contemplates an evidentiary hearing before a panel which will make factual findings and recommendations to the full board of CT Page 8277 education, which will decide the case, see Catino v. Board of Education, 174 Conn. 414 (1978).

1996See Catino v. Board of Education, 174 Conn. 414 , 389 A.2d 754 (1978).

13
Laurel Park, Inc. v. Pacgreen
conn · 1984 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997Moreover, the plaintiffs constitutional rights to due process were adequately protected by her right to raise these issues in her appeal to the trial court pursuant to § 10-151 (f). 12 Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Norwalk, 179 Conn. 111, 119-20 , 425 A.2d 576 (1979); see also Laurel Park, Inc. v. Pac, 194 Conn. 677, 686-87 , 485 A.2d 1272 (1984) (trial court may hear additional evidence if administrative record is unclear).

1997Moreover, the plaintiffs constitutional rights to due process were adequately protected by her right to raise these issues in her appeal to the trial court pursuant to § 10-151 (f). 12 Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Norwalk, 179 Conn. 111, 119-20 , 425 A.2d 576 (1979); see also Laurel Park, Inc. v. Pac, 194 Conn. 677, 686-87 , 485 A.2d 1272 (1984) (trial court may hear additional evidence if administrative record is unclear).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
Conley v. Board of Education green
conn · 1956
2 sentences

1995Tucker v. Board of Education , 177 Conn. 572 , 578 n. 5, 418 A.2d 933 (1979); Conley v. Board of Education , 143 Conn. 488 , 493-94 , 123 A.2d 747 (1956).

1995Tucker v. Board of Education , 177 Conn. 572 , 578 n. 5, 418 A.2d 933 (1979); Conley v. Board of Education , 143 Conn. 488 , 493-94 , 123 A.2d 747 (1956).

21961–1995
Tucker v. Board of Education green
conn · 1979
2 sentences

1995Tucker v. Board of Education , 177 Conn. 572 , 578 n. 5, 418 A.2d 933 (1979); Conley v. Board of Education , 143 Conn. 488 , 493-94 , 123 A.2d 747 (1956).

1995Tucker v. Board of Education , 177 Conn. 572 , 578 n. 5, 418 A.2d 933 (1979); Conley v. Board of Education , 143 Conn. 488 , 493-94 , 123 A.2d 747 (1956).

21993–1995
Oller v. Oller-Chiang green
conn · 1994
2 sentences

1997Within ninety days after receipt of the request for a hearing, the impartial hearing panel . . . unless the parties mutually agree to an extension, shall submit written findings and a recommendation to the board of education as to the disposition of the charges against the teacher, and shall send a copy of such findings and recommendation to the teacher. . . .” We note first that “the use of the word ‘shall,’ [in § 10-151 (d)] though significant, does not invariably establish a mandatory duty.” Oller v. Oller-Chiang, 230 Conn. 828, 838 , 646 A.2d 822 (1994).

1997Within ninety days after receipt of the request for a hearing, the impartial hearing panel . . . unless the parties mutually agree to an extension, shall submit written findings and a recommendation to the board of education as to the disposition of the charges against the teacher, and shall send a copy of such findings and recommendation to the teacher. . . .” We note first that “the use of the word ‘shall,’ [in § 10-151 (d)] though significant, does not invariably establish a mandatory duty.” Oller v. Oller-Chiang, 230 Conn. 828, 838 , 646 A.2d 822 (1994).

11997–1997
Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. City of Norwalk green
conn · 1979
2 sentences

1997Moreover, the plaintiffs constitutional rights to due process were adequately protected by her right to raise these issues in her appeal to the trial court pursuant to § 10-151 (f). 12 Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Norwalk, 179 Conn. 111, 119-20 , 425 A.2d 576 (1979); see also Laurel Park, Inc. v. Pac, 194 Conn. 677, 686-87 , 485 A.2d 1272 (1984) (trial court may hear additional evidence if administrative record is unclear).

1997Moreover, the plaintiffs constitutional rights to due process were adequately protected by her right to raise these issues in her appeal to the trial court pursuant to § 10-151 (f). 12 Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Norwalk, 179 Conn. 111, 119-20 , 425 A.2d 576 (1979); see also Laurel Park, Inc. v. Pac, 194 Conn. 677, 686-87 , 485 A.2d 1272 (1984) (trial court may hear additional evidence if administrative record is unclear).

11997–1997
Petrino v. Board of Education green
conn · 1980
1 sentence

1996Petrino v. Board of Education, 179 Conn. 428 , 430 (1980).

11996–1996
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Aldridge green
ala · 1925
2 sentences

1992Miller v. Aldridge, 212 Ala. 660, 664 , 103 So. 835 (1925); Stahl v. Board of Supervisors, 187 Iowa 1342, 1353 , 175 N.W. 772 (1920). 19 Because Mason is no longer a member of the board, 20 we presume that on remand the board will be so constituted as to conduct an impartial hearing.

1992Miller v. Aldridge, 212 Ala. 660, 664 , 103 So. 835 (1925); Stahl v. Board of Supervisors, 187 Iowa 1342, 1353 , 175 N.W. 772 (1920). 19 Because Mason is no longer a member of the board, 20 we presume that on remand the board will be so constituted as to conduct an impartial hearing.

11992–1992
Stahl v. Board of Supervisors green
iowa · 1920
1 sentence

1992Miller v. Aldridge, 212 Ala. 660, 664 , 103 So. 835 (1925); Stahl v. Board of Supervisors, 187 Iowa 1342, 1353 , 175 N.W. 772 (1920). 19 Because Mason is no longer a member of the board, 20 we presume that on remand the board will be so constituted as to conduct an impartial hearing.

11992–1992
Kern v. Contract Cartage Co. neutral
ohioctapp · 1936
2 sentences

1985The board of education shall give the teacher concerned its written decision within fifteen days of receipt of the written recommendation of the impartial hearing panel.” Cf. Kern v. Contract Cartage Co., 55 Ohio App. 481, 484-85 , 9 N.E.2d 869 (1936): “It seems apparent that if [the superior] court committed prejudicial error in determining the law of the case for the guidance of the [board of education] upon remand, and if we should now adhere to such erroneous determination, the Supreme Court, as the court of last review, would reverse the judgment resulting from such erroneous determinatio

1985The board of education shall give the teacher concerned its written decision within fifteen days of receipt of the written recommendation of the impartial hearing panel.” Cf. Kern v. Contract Cartage Co., 55 Ohio App. 481, 484-85 , 9 N.E.2d 869 (1936): “It seems apparent that if [the superior] court committed prejudicial error in determining the law of the case for the guidance of the [board of education] upon remand, and if we should now adhere to such erroneous determination, the Supreme Court, as the court of last review, would reverse the judgment resulting from such erroneous determinatio

11985–1985
Amos Treat & Co., Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission green
cadc · 1962
1 sentence

1984Indeed, such a substitution would be anomalous since the substitutes would neither be members of the board nor members of an impartial hearing panel selected in the statutory manner. 3 Another case cited with approval by the majority; Amos Treat & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 306 F.2d 260 (D.C.

11984–1984
Withrow v. Larkin green
scotus · 1975
2 sentences

1984Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35, 46-51 , 95 S. Ct. 1456 , 43 L.

1984Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35, 46-51 , 95 S. Ct. 1456 , 43 L.

11984–1984
Gibson v. Connecticut Medical Examining Board green
conn · 1954
2 sentences

1961Conley v. Board of Education, 143 Conn. 488, 492 , 123 A.2d 747 ; Gibson v. Medical Examining Board, 141 Conn. 218, 221 , 104 A.2d 890 .

1961Conley v. Board of Education, 143 Conn. 488, 492 , 123 A.2d 747 ; Gibson v. Medical Examining Board, 141 Conn. 218, 221 , 104 A.2d 890 .

11961–1961

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-151 (7)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 244 (1988–2026) IL 56 (1923–2025) NY 39 (1931–2024) CA 35 (1935–2025) AL 17 (1930–2025) KS 16 (1982–2026) CT 12 (1961–1997) MA 12 (1980–2023) NJ 11 (1987–2026) PA 10 (1963–2022) AZ 9 (1970–2025) TX 6 (1967–2004) MD 6 (1958–2021) CO 5 (1981–2002) SD 4 (1977–2009) WY 4 (1956–2022) FL 4 (2001–2018) NE 4 (1895–1933) VT 4 (1928–2015) DE 3 (1987–2018) MN 3 (1991–2008) OK 3 (1934–1998) WA 2 (1953–2017) NM 2 (1983–2003) MS 2 (1989–1993) DC 2 (1991–2003) MO 2 (1978–2010) UT 2 (1999–2018) RI 2 (1987–2011) AR 2 (2004–2016) WV 2 (1998–2004) TN 2 (2010–2018) MI 2 (1964–1982) LA 2 (1951–1990) ME 2 (1984–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check