Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1961–1997 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Catino v. Board of Educationgreen2 sentences1996The board of education shall give the teacher concerned its written decision within fifteen days of receipt of the written recommendation of the impartial hearing panel, subcommittee or hearing officer." Thus, the statute contemplates an evidentiary hearing before a panel which will make factual findings and recommendations to the full board of CT Page 8277 education, which will decide the case, see Catino v. Board of Education, 174 Conn. 414 (1978). 1996See Catino v. Board of Education, 174 Conn. 414 , 389 A.2d 754 (1978). | 1 | 3 |
Laurel Park, Inc. v. Pacgreen2 sentences1997Moreover, the plaintiffs constitutional rights to due process were adequately protected by her right to raise these issues in her appeal to the trial court pursuant to § 10-151 (f). 12 Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Norwalk, 179 Conn. 111, 119-20 , 425 A.2d 576 (1979); see also Laurel Park, Inc. v. Pac, 194 Conn. 677, 686-87 , 485 A.2d 1272 (1984) (trial court may hear additional evidence if administrative record is unclear). 1997Moreover, the plaintiffs constitutional rights to due process were adequately protected by her right to raise these issues in her appeal to the trial court pursuant to § 10-151 (f). 12 Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Norwalk, 179 Conn. 111, 119-20 , 425 A.2d 576 (1979); see also Laurel Park, Inc. v. Pac, 194 Conn. 677, 686-87 , 485 A.2d 1272 (1984) (trial court may hear additional evidence if administrative record is unclear). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Conley v. Board of Education
green
2 sentences1995Tucker v. Board of Education , 177 Conn. 572 , 578 n. 5, 418 A.2d 933 (1979); Conley v. Board of Education , 143 Conn. 488 , 493-94 , 123 A.2d 747 (1956). 1995Tucker v. Board of Education , 177 Conn. 572 , 578 n. 5, 418 A.2d 933 (1979); Conley v. Board of Education , 143 Conn. 488 , 493-94 , 123 A.2d 747 (1956). | 2 | 1961–1995 |
Tucker v. Board of Education
green
2 sentences1995Tucker v. Board of Education , 177 Conn. 572 , 578 n. 5, 418 A.2d 933 (1979); Conley v. Board of Education , 143 Conn. 488 , 493-94 , 123 A.2d 747 (1956). 1995Tucker v. Board of Education , 177 Conn. 572 , 578 n. 5, 418 A.2d 933 (1979); Conley v. Board of Education , 143 Conn. 488 , 493-94 , 123 A.2d 747 (1956). | 2 | 1993–1995 |
Oller v. Oller-Chiang
green
2 sentences1997Within ninety days after receipt of the request for a hearing, the impartial hearing panel . . . unless the parties mutually agree to an extension, shall submit written findings and a recommendation to the board of education as to the disposition of the charges against the teacher, and shall send a copy of such findings and recommendation to the teacher. . . .” We note first that “the use of the word ‘shall,’ [in § 10-151 (d)] though significant, does not invariably establish a mandatory duty.” Oller v. Oller-Chiang, 230 Conn. 828, 838 , 646 A.2d 822 (1994). 1997Within ninety days after receipt of the request for a hearing, the impartial hearing panel . . . unless the parties mutually agree to an extension, shall submit written findings and a recommendation to the board of education as to the disposition of the charges against the teacher, and shall send a copy of such findings and recommendation to the teacher. . . .” We note first that “the use of the word ‘shall,’ [in § 10-151 (d)] though significant, does not invariably establish a mandatory duty.” Oller v. Oller-Chiang, 230 Conn. 828, 838 , 646 A.2d 822 (1994). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. City of Norwalk
green
2 sentences1997Moreover, the plaintiffs constitutional rights to due process were adequately protected by her right to raise these issues in her appeal to the trial court pursuant to § 10-151 (f). 12 Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Norwalk, 179 Conn. 111, 119-20 , 425 A.2d 576 (1979); see also Laurel Park, Inc. v. Pac, 194 Conn. 677, 686-87 , 485 A.2d 1272 (1984) (trial court may hear additional evidence if administrative record is unclear). 1997Moreover, the plaintiffs constitutional rights to due process were adequately protected by her right to raise these issues in her appeal to the trial court pursuant to § 10-151 (f). 12 Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Norwalk, 179 Conn. 111, 119-20 , 425 A.2d 576 (1979); see also Laurel Park, Inc. v. Pac, 194 Conn. 677, 686-87 , 485 A.2d 1272 (1984) (trial court may hear additional evidence if administrative record is unclear). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Petrino v. Board of Education
green
1 sentence1996Petrino v. Board of Education, 179 Conn. 428 , 430 (1980). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Aldridge
green
2 sentences1992Miller v. Aldridge, 212 Ala. 660, 664 , 103 So. 835 (1925); Stahl v. Board of Supervisors, 187 Iowa 1342, 1353 , 175 N.W. 772 (1920). 19 Because Mason is no longer a member of the board, 20 we presume that on remand the board will be so constituted as to conduct an impartial hearing. 1992Miller v. Aldridge, 212 Ala. 660, 664 , 103 So. 835 (1925); Stahl v. Board of Supervisors, 187 Iowa 1342, 1353 , 175 N.W. 772 (1920). 19 Because Mason is no longer a member of the board, 20 we presume that on remand the board will be so constituted as to conduct an impartial hearing. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Stahl v. Board of Supervisors
green
1 sentence1992Miller v. Aldridge, 212 Ala. 660, 664 , 103 So. 835 (1925); Stahl v. Board of Supervisors, 187 Iowa 1342, 1353 , 175 N.W. 772 (1920). 19 Because Mason is no longer a member of the board, 20 we presume that on remand the board will be so constituted as to conduct an impartial hearing. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Kern v. Contract Cartage Co.
neutral
2 sentences1985The board of education shall give the teacher concerned its written decision within fifteen days of receipt of the written recommendation of the impartial hearing panel.” Cf. Kern v. Contract Cartage Co., 55 Ohio App. 481, 484-85 , 9 N.E.2d 869 (1936): “It seems apparent that if [the superior] court committed prejudicial error in determining the law of the case for the guidance of the [board of education] upon remand, and if we should now adhere to such erroneous determination, the Supreme Court, as the court of last review, would reverse the judgment resulting from such erroneous determinatio 1985The board of education shall give the teacher concerned its written decision within fifteen days of receipt of the written recommendation of the impartial hearing panel.” Cf. Kern v. Contract Cartage Co., 55 Ohio App. 481, 484-85 , 9 N.E.2d 869 (1936): “It seems apparent that if [the superior] court committed prejudicial error in determining the law of the case for the guidance of the [board of education] upon remand, and if we should now adhere to such erroneous determination, the Supreme Court, as the court of last review, would reverse the judgment resulting from such erroneous determinatio | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Amos Treat & Co., Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission
green
1 sentence1984Indeed, such a substitution would be anomalous since the substitutes would neither be members of the board nor members of an impartial hearing panel selected in the statutory manner. 3 Another case cited with approval by the majority; Amos Treat & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 306 F.2d 260 (D.C. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Withrow v. Larkin
green
2 sentences1984Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35, 46-51 , 95 S. Ct. 1456 , 43 L. 1984Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35, 46-51 , 95 S. Ct. 1456 , 43 L. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Gibson v. Connecticut Medical Examining Board
green
2 sentences1961Conley v. Board of Education, 143 Conn. 488, 492 , 123 A.2d 747 ; Gibson v. Medical Examining Board, 141 Conn. 218, 221 , 104 A.2d 890 . 1961Conley v. Board of Education, 143 Conn. 488, 492 , 123 A.2d 747 ; Gibson v. Medical Examining Board, 141 Conn. 218, 221 , 104 A.2d 890 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.