Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Schneckloth v. Bustamontegreen2 sentences2009Schneckloth v. Bustamonte , 412 U.S. 218, 219 (1973) (quoting Katz v. United States , 389 U.S. 347, 357 (1967)). 2007Schneckloth v. Bustamonte , 412 U.S. 218, 219 (1973) (quoting Katz v. United States , 389 U.S. 347, 357 (1967)). | 5 | 6 |
Katz v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2009Schneckloth v. Bustamonte , 412 U.S. 218, 219 (1973) (quoting Katz v. United States , 389 U.S. 347, 357 (1967)). 2007Schneckloth v. Bustamonte , 412 U.S. 218, 219 (1973) (quoting Katz v. United States , 389 U.S. 347, 357 (1967)). | 2 | 2 |
Ohio v. Robinettegreen2 sentences2005See Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33, 40 , 117 S.Ct. 417, 421 , 136 L.Ed.2d 347 (1996); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219 , 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2043-44 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); Maxwell v. State, 73 S.W.3d 278, 281 (Tex.Crim.App.2002); Carmouche v. State, 10 S.W.3d 323, 331 (Tex.Crim.App.2000). 2005See Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33, 40 , 117 S.Ct. 417, 421 , 136 L.Ed.2d 347 (1996); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219 , 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2043-44 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); Maxwell v. State, 73 S.W.3d 278, 281 (Tex.Crim.App.2002); Carmouche v. State, 10 S.W.3d 323, 331 (Tex.Crim.App.2000). | 2 | 2 |
Maxwell v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See Ohio v. Robinette , 519 U.S. 33, 40 , 117 S. Ct. 417, 421 (1996); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte , 412 U.S. 218, 219 , 93 S. Ct. 2041, 2043-44 (1973); Maxwell v. State , 73 S.W.3d 278, 281 ( Tex. Crim. 2005See Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33, 40 , 117 S.Ct. 417, 421 , 136 L.Ed.2d 347 (1996); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219 , 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2043-44 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); Maxwell v. State, 73 S.W.3d 278, 281 (Tex.Crim.App.2002); Carmouche v. State, 10 S.W.3d 323, 331 (Tex.Crim.App.2000). | 2 | 2 |
Carter v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Missouri -3- 04-12-00739-CR v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 , 614–17 (2004) (plurality op.); id. at 620–22 (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment); Carter v. State, 309 S.W.3d 31, 38 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Carmouche v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33, 40 , 117 S.Ct. 417, 421 , 136 L.Ed.2d 347 (1996); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219 , 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2043-44 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); Maxwell v. State, 73 S.W.3d 278, 281 (Tex.Crim.App.2002); Carmouche v. State, 10 S.W.3d 323, 331 (Tex.Crim.App.2000). 2005See Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33, 40 , 117 S.Ct. 417, 421 , 136 L.Ed.2d 347 (1996); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219 , 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2043-44 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); Maxwell v. State, 73 S.W.3d 278, 281 (Tex.Crim.App.2002); Carmouche v. State, 10 S.W.3d 323, 331 (Tex.Crim.App.2000). | 1 | 1 |
Emerson v. Stategreen2 sentences2000The Court noted in Emerson that the NHTSA testing procedures require the “officer to screen the suspect for factors such as corrective lenses, brain damage, medical disorders, or blindness, which could lead potentially to an incorrect determination as to whether the suspect is intoxicated.” Emerson, 880 S.W.2d at 766 (citing National Highway Traffic Safety Admin., U.S. Dep’t of Transp., DWI Detection AND STANDARDIZED FlELD SOBRIETY Testing, Student Manual VIII — 14-15 (1992)). 4 Concerning this screening, the Court later noted that the NHTSA testing procedures “require an officer to screen for 2000The Court noted in Emerson that the NHTSA testing procedures require the “officer to screen the suspect for factors such as corrective lenses, brain damage, medical disorders, or blindness, which could lead potentially to an incorrect determination as to whether the suspect is intoxicated.” Emerson, 880 S.W.2d at 766 (citing National Highway Traffic Safety Admin., U.S. Dep’t of Transp., DWI Detection AND STANDARDIZED FlELD SOBRIETY Testing, Student Manual VIII — 14-15 (1992)). 4 Concerning this screening, the Court later noted that the NHTSA testing procedures “require an officer to screen for | 1 | 1 |
Dejarnette v. Stategreen2 sentences1987In DeJarnette, supra, at 351, we stated that with regard to the escape evidence, “there must be some evidence amounting to satisfactory proof, ... indicating that the defendant was about to escape so that there was no time to procure a warrant.” We added that the proximity of police apprehension to the commission of the crime and disclosure by the police of their investigation to the suspect are factors which may be considered in determining whether there is sufficient proof. 1987In DeJarnette, supra, at 351, we stated that with regard to the escape evidence, "there must be some evidence amounting to satisfactory proof, ... indicating that the defendant was about to escape so that there was no time to procure a warrant." We added that the proximity of police apprehension to the commission of the crime and disclosure by the police of their investigation to the suspect are factors which may be considered in determining whether there is sufficient proof. | 1 | 1 |
Galitz v. Stategreen1 sentence1984Galitz v. State, 617 S.W.2d 949, 957 (Tex.Crim.App.1981). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Erdman v. State
green
2 sentences2006Id. at 893-94 . 2004Erdman , 861 S.W.2d at 893-94 . | 3 | 2004–2006 |
Praska v. State
green
1 sentence2015Derichsweiler, 348 S.W.3d at 914 ; Praska, 557 S.W.2d at 85-86 ; see also Bland v. Texas Dep’t of Pub. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Derichsweiler v. State
green
1 sentence2015Derichsweiler, 348 S.W.3d at 914 ; Praska, 557 S.W.2d at 85-86 ; see also Bland v. Texas Dep’t of Pub. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Missouri v. Seibert
green
2 sentences2014Missouri -3- 04-12-00739-CR v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 , 614–17 (2004) (plurality op.); id. at 620–22 (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment); Carter v. State, 309 S.W.3d 31, 38 (Tex. Crim. 2014Missouri -3- 04-12-00739-CR v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 , 614–17 (2004) (plurality op.); id. at 620–22 (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment); Carter v. State, 309 S.W.3d 31, 38 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Aviles v. State
green
1 sentence2006Id. at 78-79 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Chapa v. State
green
2 sentences1994Id. at VIII-14—VIII-15. 1994Id. at VIII-14 — -VIII-15. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Keeton v. State
green
1 sentence1993Keeton, 749 S.W.2d at 868 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.