Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1966–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Charles Manbeck v. Austin Independent School Districtgreen2 sentences2021See Manbeck v. Austin ISD, 381 S.W.3d 528, 530 (Tex. 2012). 2014Id. (citing Rusk State Hosp. v. Black, 392 S.W.3d 88, 94-95 (Tex. 2012)). | 1 | 2 |
Davis v. City of San Antoniogreen2 sentences1994Davis v. City of San Antonio, 752 S.W.2d 518 (Tex.1988); Tex.R.Civ.P. 94. 1991Davis v. City of San Antonio, 752 S.W.2d 518, 520 (Tex.1988). 3 . | 1 | 2 |
Cloud v. McKinneygreen1 sentence2022See Tex. A & M Univ. v. Starks, 500 S.W.3d 560, 576 (Tex. App.—Waco 2016, no pet.); Cloud v. McKinney, 228 S.W.3d 326, 333 (Tex. App.— Austin 2007, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Texas A&M University, Mark Hussey, Ph.D. in His Official Capacity as Interim President of Texas A&M and David Vaught, Ph.D., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Department Head of Department History v. Ernest Starks, Ph.D.green1 sentence2022See Tex. A & M Univ. v. Starks, 500 S.W.3d 560, 576 (Tex. App.—Waco 2016, no pet.); Cloud v. McKinney, 228 S.W.3d 326, 333 (Tex. App.— Austin 2007, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. Heinrichgreen1 sentence2016See City of El Paso v. Heinrich, 284 S.W.3d 366, 380 (Tex. 2009). | 1 | 1 |
Catalina Development, Inc. v. County of El Pasogreen1 sentence2015Catalina Development, Inc. v. Cnty. of El Paso, 121 S.W.3d 704, 705 (Tex. 2003). | 1 | 1 |
Rusk State Hospital v. Blackgreen1 sentence2014Id. (citing Rusk State Hosp. v. Black, 392 S.W.3d 88, 94-95 (Tex. 2012)). | 1 | 1 |
Price Pfister, Inc. v. Moore & Kimmey, Inc.green1 sentence2010See Price Pfister, Inc. v. Moore & Kimmey, Inc., 48 S.W.3d 341, 349 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. denied) (“Because the statement made by MKI’s attorney was, at best, equivocal, it cannot constitute a judicial admission.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Laingreen2 sentences1991Lain, 162 Tex. 549 , 349 S.W.2d 579, 582 (1961). 1991Lain, 162 Tex. 549 , 349 S.W.2d 579, 582 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Schertz v. Parker
green
2 sentences2006Schertz, 754 S.W.2d at 340-41 . 2006Schertz , 754 S.W.2d at 340-41 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |
City of Dallas v. Hillis
green
1 sentence2015Liability for Perez’s negligence Page 7 of 11 308 S.W.3d 526, *532 ; 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 2854 , **11 The first liability theory pleaded by the Hillises is The only evidence admitted at the hearing on the that the City is liable because Perez negligently City’s plea to the jurisdiction was the video taken and directly caused Taylor Hillis’s death by by the camera mounted in Perez’s patrol car. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Bellnoa v. City of Austin
green
1 sentence2015The trial court’s decision was also correct because, at a minimum, fact issues exist as to whether the City made a policy-formulation decision and simply failed to implement it...........................................................................................................25 Prayer .......................................................................................................................27 Certificate of Compliance ........................................................................................29 Certificate of Service ............................................. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Montgomery v. Kennedy
green
1 sentence1992Montgomery v. Kennedy, 669 S.W.2d 309 (Tex.1984). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Gray v. City of Orange
neutral
1 sentence1986Lowe v. Texas Tech University, S.Ct., 540 S.W.2d 297, 299 ; Gray v. City of Orange, CCA (Beaumont) NRE, 601 S.W.2d 100, 101 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Lowe v. Texas Tech University
green
1 sentence1986Lowe v. Texas Tech University, S.Ct., 540 S.W.2d 297, 299 ; Gray v. City of Orange, CCA (Beaumont) NRE, 601 S.W.2d 100, 101 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Sarmiento v. City of Corpus Christi
green
1 sentence1977Dobbins v. Texas Turnpike Authority, 496 S.W.2d 744 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1973, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Sarmiento v. City of Corpus Christi, 465 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1971, no writ); Greenhill & Murto, Governmental Immunity, 49 Tex.L.Rev. 462 (1971). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Dobbins v. Texas Turnpike Authority
green
1 sentence1977Dobbins v. Texas Turnpike Authority, 496 S.W.2d 744 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1973, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Sarmiento v. City of Corpus Christi, 465 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1971, no writ); Greenhill & Murto, Governmental Immunity, 49 Tex.L.Rev. 462 (1971). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
City of Austin v. Daniels
green
2 sentences1966Because, perhaps, of the statement by the Supreme Court in City of Austin v. Daniels, supra, to the effect that a city, "When acting in a governmental capacity * * * is not liable in damages for torts of its employees" ( 335 S.W.2d at p. 754 ), Texas city attorneys have evidenced no reluctance to rely on the defense of governmental immunity. 1966Because, perhaps, of the statement by the Supreme Court in City of Austin v. Daniels, supra, to the effect that a city, “When acting in a governmental capacity * * * is not liable in damages for torts of its employees” ( 335 S.W.2d at p. 754 ), Texas city attorneys have evidenced no reluctance to rely on the defense of governmental immunity. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.