Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1948–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2018“Put another way, is there a reasonable possibility that the Crawford [v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004),] error, within the context of the entire trial, moved the jury from a state of non-persuasion to one of persuasion on a particular issue?” Davis, 203 S.W.3d at 852–53. containing hearsay is lower than the standard for reviewing harm from a presumed error in admitting a statement that violated appellant’s right to confront adverse witnesses.” Id. (citing cases and explaining that error in admitting hearsay is not reversible unless it affected defendant’s substantial rights while constitutio 2018“Put another way, is there a reasonable possibility that the Crawford [v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004),] error, within the context of the entire trial, moved the jury from a state of non-persuasion to one of persuasion on a particular issue?” Davis, 203 S.W.3d at 852–53. containing hearsay is lower than the standard for reviewing harm from a presumed error in admitting a statement that violated appellant’s right to confront adverse witnesses.” Id. (citing cases and explaining that error in admitting hearsay is not reversible unless it affected defendant’s substantial rights while constitutio | 1 | 2 |
Brodrick Dechone Delane AKA Broderick Shun Delane AKA Shaun Scott v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See id. | 1 | 1 |
Clay v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Clay v. State, 240 S.W.3d 895, 904 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Brooks v. Stategreen1 sentence2018In doing so, we eliminate all of Johnson’s testimony regarding appellant’s statements and “determine if the remaining inculpatory evidence tends to connect appellant to the offense.” Brooks v. State, 357 S.W.3d 777, 782 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1 |
Snowden, Rion Phealgreen1 sentence2017See Snowden, 353 S.W.3d at 822 . | 1 | 1 |
Jennifer Jill Whitehead v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See Whitehead v. State, 437 S.W.3d 547, 553 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2014, pet. ref'd). | 1 | 1 |
Lindsay v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Lindsay v. State, 102 S.W.3d 223, 228 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref’d) (analyzing harm for error in admitting improper victim- impact testimony relating to an extraneous offense). | 1 | 1 |
King v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See King v. State , 953 S.W.2d 266, 271 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. Rubushgreen1 sentence1963Texas Employers’ Insurance Association v. Rubush, 337 S.W.2d 501, 503 (Tex.Civ.App., Fort Worth), 1960, citing the Aultman case, supra. “In enforcing those Rules (434 and 503, T.R.C.P.) we have held with respect to many and various types of errors that a reversal may be ordered only when a review of ‘the whole record’ convinces the reviewing court that but for the error a different verdict or judgment would probably have been rendered.” Condra Funeral Home v. Rollin (1958), 158 Tex. 478 , 314 S.W.2d 277 . “ ‘As a predicate on which to base reversible error in improper argument of counsel which | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pham v. State
green
2 sentences2022He continued that “the lack of a payment for a jury trial and the information about the judge’s reluctance to be the factfinder in a bench trial, if anything, call into question defense Rios–14 counsel’s testimony and not [Appellant]’s” and that “[t]he record is silent as to whether defense counsel relayed this information to his client before the trial began, but it seems highly unlikely that [Appellant] would have persisted in a presumed waiver of a jury had the information been relayed to him.” Id. 2022He continued that “the lack of a payment for a jury trial and the information about the judge’s reluctance to be the factfinder in a bench trial, if anything, call into question defense Rios–14 counsel’s testimony and not [Appellant]’s” and that “[t]he record is silent as to whether defense counsel relayed this information to his client before the trial began, but it seems highly unlikely that [Appellant] would have persisted in a presumed waiver of a jury had the information been relayed to him.” Id. | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Taylor v. State
green
1 sentence2023Taylor, 332 S.W.3d at 490 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Ferguson v. State
green
1 sentence2019Appellant raised his charge objection at trial and we therefore review the presumed error for “some harm.” See Ferguson, 335 S.W.3d at 684-85 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Nava, Andres Maldonado
green
1 sentence2018Assuming, but not deciding, that the trial court’s failure to do so was erroneous, we will review the record to determine whether appellant suffered egregious harm as a result of the presumed error.1 See Nava, 415 S.W.3d at 298 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Crawford v. Washington
green
1 sentence2018“Put another way, is there a reasonable possibility that the Crawford [v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004),] error, within the context of the entire trial, moved the jury from a state of non-persuasion to one of persuasion on a particular issue?” Davis, 203 S.W.3d at 852–53. containing hearsay is lower than the standard for reviewing harm from a presumed error in admitting a statement that violated appellant’s right to confront adverse witnesses.” Id. (citing cases and explaining that error in admitting hearsay is not reversible unless it affected defendant’s substantial rights while constitutio | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Burdick v. State
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Condra Funeral Home v. Rollin
green
2 sentences1963Texas Employers’ Insurance Association v. Rubush, 337 S.W.2d 501, 503 (Tex.Civ.App., Fort Worth), 1960, citing the Aultman case, supra. “In enforcing those Rules (434 and 503, T.R.C.P.) we have held with respect to many and various types of errors that a reversal may be ordered only when a review of ‘the whole record’ convinces the reviewing court that but for the error a different verdict or judgment would probably have been rendered.” Condra Funeral Home v. Rollin (1958), 158 Tex. 478 , 314 S.W.2d 277 . “ ‘As a predicate on which to base reversible error in improper argument of counsel which 1963Texas Employers’ Insurance Association v. Rubush, 337 S.W.2d 501, 503 (Tex.Civ.App., Fort Worth), 1960, citing the Aultman case, supra. “In enforcing those Rules (434 and 503, T.R.C.P.) we have held with respect to many and various types of errors that a reversal may be ordered only when a review of ‘the whole record’ convinces the reviewing court that but for the error a different verdict or judgment would probably have been rendered.” Condra Funeral Home v. Rollin (1958), 158 Tex. 478 , 314 S.W.2d 277 . “ ‘As a predicate on which to base reversible error in improper argument of counsel which | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Texas General Indemnity Company v. Bridwell
neutral
1 sentence1963Texas Employers’ Insurance Association v. Rubush, 337 S.W.2d 501, 503 (Tex.Civ.App., Fort Worth), 1960, citing the Aultman case, supra. “In enforcing those Rules (434 and 503, T.R.C.P.) we have held with respect to many and various types of errors that a reversal may be ordered only when a review of ‘the whole record’ convinces the reviewing court that but for the error a different verdict or judgment would probably have been rendered.” Condra Funeral Home v. Rollin (1958), 158 Tex. 478 , 314 S.W.2d 277 . “ ‘As a predicate on which to base reversible error in improper argument of counsel which | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Schuhmacher Co. v. Holcomb
green
2 sentences1948However, in Schuhmacher Co. v. Holcomb, 142 Tex. 332 , 177 S.W.2d 951 , and in Texas Employers Ins. 1948However, in Schuhmacher Co. v. Holcomb, 142 Tex. 332 , 177 S.W.2d 951 , and in Texas Employers Ins. | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.