15 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sessions v. Dimayagreen1 sentence2023See Sessions, 138 S. Ct. at 1211 . 10 No. 84274-9-I/11 2276, 186 L .Ed. 2d 438 (2013). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Floresgreen2 sentences2019App. 2d at 162-63. 37 Mecham, 186 Wn.2d at 144 ; see also State v. Flores, 186 Wn.2d 506, 516 , 379 P.3d 104 (2016)(during a traffic stop, officers may order passengers to stay in or exit a vehicle in order control the scene of an investigation and ensure their safety as long as they can articulate an objective rationale for doing so). 38 Lee's challenge to finding of fact 9 relates to whether she was seized while pacing, a theory immaterial to the ultimate legal question. 2019App. 2d at 162-63. 37 Mecham, 186 Wn.2d at 144 ; see also State v. Flores, 186 Wn.2d 506, 516 , 379 P.3d 104 (2016)(during a traffic stop, officers may order passengers to stay in or exit a vehicle in order control the scene of an investigation and ensure their safety as long as they can articulate an objective rationale for doing so). 38 Lee's challenge to finding of fact 9 relates to whether she was seized while pacing, a theory immaterial to the ultimate legal question. | 1 | 1 |
Barker v. Wingogreen1 sentence2017The Barker Court recognized both of these concerns as potential sources of prejudice. 407 U.S. at 532 (The speedy trial right is intended to "minimize the anxiety and concern of the accused[] and ... to limit the possibility that the defense will be impaired."). 9 We agree with the concurring opinion from the Court of Appeals, which correctly notes that Lee's claim is more properly considered as an undue preaccusation delay under the due process clause. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. MacDonaldgreen1 sentence2017See MacDonald, 456 U.S. at 7 ("Any undue delay after charges are dismissed, like any delay before charges are filed, must be scrutinized under the Due Process Clause, not the Speedy Trial Clause."). | 1 | 1 |
Flavorland Industries, Inc. v. Schumackergreen2 sentences1984See Flavorland Indus., Inc. v. Schumacker, 32 Wn. 1984See Flavorland Indus., Inc. v. Schumacher, 32 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Babcock v. State
green
2 sentences2013Because we view the facts in a light most favorable to Kim for purposes of summary judgment, Babcock v. State, 116 Wn.2d 596, 598-99 , 809 P.2d 143 (1991), we accept Kim’s assertions that the March 29 visit was a follow-up appointment at which Lee examined and took x-rays of all areas of his mouth. 2013Because we view the facts in a light most favorable to Kim for purposes of summary judgment, Babcock v. State, 116 Wn.2d 596, 598-99 , 809 P.2d 143 (1991), we accept Kim’s assertions that the March 29 visit was a follow-up appointment at which Lee examined and took x-rays of all areas of his mouth. | 2 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Levy
green
1 sentence2024State v. Swan, 114 Wn.2d 613, 657 , 790 P.2d 610 (1990); State v. Levy, 156 Wn.2d 709, 719-20 , 132 P.3d 1076 (2006). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Swan
green
2 sentences2024State v. Swan, 114 Wn.2d 613, 657 , 790 P.2d 610 (1990); State v. Levy, 156 Wn.2d 709, 719-20 , 132 P.3d 1076 (2006). 2024State v. Swan, 114 Wn.2d 613, 657 , 790 P.2d 610 (1990); State v. Levy, 156 Wn.2d 709, 719-20 , 132 P.3d 1076 (2006). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Levy
green
1 sentence2024State v. Swan, 114 Wn.2d 613, 657 , 790 P.2d 610 (1990); State v. Levy, 156 Wn.2d 709, 719-20 , 132 P.3d 1076 (2006). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Gallegos
green
1 sentence2022App. 230, 238 , 828 P.2d 37 (1992) (defendant is entitled to a voluntary intoxication instruction only if the crime has a particular mental state as an element). 9 Because we find defense counsel was not ineffective, there was no error, and we therefore do reach Lee’s claim of cumulative error. - 10 - No. 82597-6-I/11 V. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Matter of Personal Restraint of Rice
green
1 sentence2020Rice, 118 Wn.2d at 886 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In Re the Personal Restraint of Keene
green
1 sentence2020WE CONCUR: 13 State v. Keene, 95 Wn.2d 203, 207 , 622 P.2d 622 (quoting Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 645 , 96 S. Ct. 2253 , 49 L. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Henderson v. Morgan
green
2 sentences2020WE CONCUR: 13 State v. Keene, 95 Wn.2d 203, 207 , 622 P.2d 622 (quoting Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 645 , 96 S. Ct. 2253 , 49 L. 2020WE CONCUR: 13 State v. Keene, 95 Wn.2d 203, 207 , 622 P.2d 622 (quoting Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 645 , 96 S. Ct. 2253 , 49 L. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In re the Marriage of Kim
green
1 sentence2020We did not consider the stricken declaration. 10 No. 52756-1-II Kim, 179 Wn. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Darden
green
1 sentence2017W. 's prior false allegation was relevant to Lee's defense, it could not be excluded unless the State demonstrated "a compelling interest to exclude prejudicial or inflammatory evidence." Darden, 145 Wn.2d at 621 (citing Hudlow, 99 Wn.2d at 16 ). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Hudlow
green
1 sentence2017W. 's prior false allegation was relevant to Lee's defense, it could not be excluded unless the State demonstrated "a compelling interest to exclude prejudicial or inflammatory evidence." Darden, 145 Wn.2d at 621 (citing Hudlow, 99 Wn.2d at 16 ). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Poston v. Mathers
green
2 sentences2015Accordingly, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to determine that Lee's instruction was inappropriate for the facts of this case. 22 95 Wn.2d 593 , 627 P.2d 1312 (1981). 23 77 Wn.2d 329 , 462 P.2d 222 (1969). 24 87 Wn.2d 217 , 551 P.2d 748 (1976). 25 Sanchez. 95 Wn.2d at 594 ; Poston, 77 Wn.2d at 330-31 ; Grobe, 87 Wn.2dat219. 26 Fergen, 182 Wn.2d at 803 . 2015Accordingly, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to determine that Lee's instruction was inappropriate for the facts of this case. 22 95 Wn.2d 593 , 627 P.2d 1312 (1981). 23 77 Wn.2d 329 , 462 P.2d 222 (1969). 24 87 Wn.2d 217 , 551 P.2d 748 (1976). 25 Sanchez. 95 Wn.2d at 594 ; Poston, 77 Wn.2d at 330-31 ; Grobe, 87 Wn.2dat219. 26 Fergen, 182 Wn.2d at 803 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Grobe v. Valley Garbage Service, Inc.
green
2 sentences2015Accordingly, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to determine that Lee's instruction was inappropriate for the facts of this case. 22 95 Wn.2d 593 , 627 P.2d 1312 (1981). 23 77 Wn.2d 329 , 462 P.2d 222 (1969). 24 87 Wn.2d 217 , 551 P.2d 748 (1976). 25 Sanchez. 95 Wn.2d at 594 ; Poston, 77 Wn.2d at 330-31 ; Grobe, 87 Wn.2dat219. 26 Fergen, 182 Wn.2d at 803 . 2015Accordingly, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to determine that Lee's instruction was inappropriate for the facts of this case. 22 95 Wn.2d 593 , 627 P.2d 1312 (1981). 23 77 Wn.2d 329 , 462 P.2d 222 (1969). 24 87 Wn.2d 217 , 551 P.2d 748 (1976). 25 Sanchez. 95 Wn.2d at 594 ; Poston, 77 Wn.2d at 330-31 ; Grobe, 87 Wn.2dat219. 26 Fergen, 182 Wn.2d at 803 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Sanchez v. Haddix
green
2 sentences2015Accordingly, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to determine that Lee's instruction was inappropriate for the facts of this case. 22 95 Wn.2d 593 , 627 P.2d 1312 (1981). 23 77 Wn.2d 329 , 462 P.2d 222 (1969). 24 87 Wn.2d 217 , 551 P.2d 748 (1976). 25 Sanchez. 95 Wn.2d at 594 ; Poston, 77 Wn.2d at 330-31 ; Grobe, 87 Wn.2dat219. 26 Fergen, 182 Wn.2d at 803 . 2015Accordingly, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to determine that Lee's instruction was inappropriate for the facts of this case. 22 95 Wn.2d 593 , 627 P.2d 1312 (1981). 23 77 Wn.2d 329 , 462 P.2d 222 (1969). 24 87 Wn.2d 217 , 551 P.2d 748 (1976). 25 Sanchez. 95 Wn.2d at 594 ; Poston, 77 Wn.2d at 330-31 ; Grobe, 87 Wn.2dat219. 26 Fergen, 182 Wn.2d at 803 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. DILUZIO
neutral
1 sentence2013App. 166, 171 , 252 P.3d 909 , rev. denied. 173 Wn.2d 1002 , 268 P.3d941 (2011). 9The main purpose of Kim's declaration was to support his contention that the March 29, 2007 visit was a follow-up visit for the restoration work and rebut Lee's claim that it was a visit for a routine prophylaxis. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
CORTEZ-KLOEHN v. Morrison
neutral
1 sentence2013App. 166, 171 , 252 P.3d 909 , rev. denied. 173 Wn.2d 1002 , 268 P.3d941 (2011). 9The main purpose of Kim's declaration was to support his contention that the March 29, 2007 visit was a follow-up visit for the restoration work and rebut Lee's claim that it was a visit for a routine prophylaxis. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Colwell v. Holy Family Hosp.
green
1 sentence2012App. 606, 615 , 15 P.3d 210 (2001). ¶11 During the hearing on Mr. Lee’s motion to quash the subpoena relating to Mr. Mitchell, Officer Doyle argued the summary judgment hearing should be continued. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
United States v. Billy Ray Lee
green
2 sentences2012Again, we underscore that, unlike the situation described in Lee , Bange’s case had not previously gone to trial; thus, we did not hold in her previous appeal that the trial court erred in “ ‘the conduct of a trial.’ ” Dissent at 855 (quoting ice, 539 F.2d at 608 ). 2012Again, we underscore that, unlike the situation described in Lee , Bange’s case had not previously gone to trial; thus, we did not hold in her previous appeal that the trial court erred in “ ‘the conduct of a trial.’ ” Dissent at 855 (quoting ice, 539 F.2d at 608 ). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Striker
green
2 sentences1987The dispositive issue is whether a defendant who absents himself from the state is amenable to process during his absence so as to invoke the rule in State v. Striker, 87 Wn.2d 870 , 557 P.2d 847 (1976). 1987The dispositive issue is whether a defendant who absents himself from the state is amenable to process during his absence so as to invoke the rule in State v. Striker, 87 Wn.2d 870 , 557 P.2d 847 (1976). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.