Lee motion (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

Lee motion in Ohio

7 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Jae Lee v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 2017 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020Id. {¶ 23} Second, Lee’s plea-stage counsel also testified at the hearing and acknowledged that if he had known Lee would be deported upon pleading guilty, he would have advised him to go to trial.

2020Id. {¶ 24} And finally, the record of Lee’s plea colloquy demonstrated that he did not understand the trial court’s advisement that pleading guilty could result in deportation.

11
State v. Nitschegreen
ohioctapp · 2016 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017Cuyahoga No. 103174, 2016-Ohio-3170, ¶ 95 (defendant was unable to show that he was prejudiced by the trial court’s denial of motion to sever where he was acquitted of one charge and convicted of other offenses); citing State v. Banks, 2015-Ohio-5413 , 56 N.E.3d 289 , ¶ 66-68 (8th Dist.) (defendant was unable to show that he was prejudiced by the trial court’s denial of motion to sever where he was acquitted of some charges and convicted of a lesser offense in others). {¶20} In accordance with the foregoing, we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in denying Lee’s motion to sever c

11
Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.green
scotus · 1962 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016See Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co., 370 U.S. 238, 248-249 , 82 S.Ct. 1318 , 8 L.Ed.2d 462 (1962) (holding that Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. 185(a), provides that when a private-sector union is liable for damages for violation of a collective-bargaining contract, its officers, members, and agents cannot be held personally liable for those damages); Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1259 (9th Cir.1985) (holding that outside counsel retained by a private-sector union is not subject to individual liability for acts performed on behalf of the un

2016See Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co., 370 U.S. 238, 248-249 , 82 S.Ct. 1318 , 8 L.Ed.2d 462 (1962) (holding that Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. 185(a), provides that when a private-sector union is liable for damages for violation of a collective-bargaining contract, its officers, members, and agents cannot be held personally liable for those damages); Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1259 (9th Cir.1985) (holding that outside counsel retained by a private-sector union is not subject to individual liability for acts performed on behalf of the un

11
James E. Peterson v. Harold Kennedy, Richard A. Berthelsen, and National Football League Players Associationgreen
ca9 · 1985 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co., 370 U.S. 238, 248-249 , 82 S.Ct. 1318 , 8 L.Ed.2d 462 (1962) (holding that Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. 185(a), provides that when a private-sector union is liable for damages for violation of a collective-bargaining contract, its officers, members, and agents cannot be held personally liable for those damages); Peterson v. Kennedy, 771 F.2d 1244, 1259 (9th Cir.1985) (holding that outside counsel retained by a private-sector union is not subject to individual liability for acts performed on behalf of the un

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Romero (Slip Opinion) green
ohio · 2019
1 sentence

2025The Supreme Court concluded in Lee that Lee’s claim that he would not have accepted a plea had he known it would lead to deportation was backed by “substantial and uncontroverted evidence.” Id. at 371. {¶ 58} Finally, State v. Romero, 2019-Ohio-1839 , involved a noncitizen defendant from Honduras who was a lawful permanent resident of the United States and pled guilty to drug offenses.

12025–2025
State v. Biehl, Unpublished Decision (12-8-2004) green
ohioctapp · 2004
1 sentence

2020Summit No. 22054, 2004-Ohio-6532, ¶ 14 . {¶10} In ruling on Ms. Lee’s motion to suppress, the trial court made each of the following factual findings.

12020–2020
State v. Banks green
ohioctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2017Cuyahoga No. 103174, 2016-Ohio-3170, ¶ 95 (defendant was unable to show that he was prejudiced by the trial court’s denial of motion to sever where he was acquitted of one charge and convicted of other offenses); citing State v. Banks, 2015-Ohio-5413 , 56 N.E.3d 289 , ¶ 66-68 (8th Dist.) (defendant was unable to show that he was prejudiced by the trial court’s denial of motion to sever where he was acquitted of some charges and convicted of a lesser offense in others). {¶20} In accordance with the foregoing, we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in denying Lee’s motion to sever c

12017–2017
State v. Roe green
ohio · 1989
1 sentence

2001Next, the duty to advise of Miranda rights only attaches when an individual is subject to a "custodial interrogation." State v. Roe (1989), 41 Ohio St.3d 18 , 21 .

12001–2001
Anders v. California green
scotus · 1967
1 sentence

1998This court has performed its obligation, pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, to conduct an independent review of the record, including transcripts of the proceedings in which Lee's motion for treatment in lieu of conviction was denied, her negotiated plea of no contest to one count of Robbery was accepted, and sentence was imposed.

11998–1998

Where else courts name it

CA 40 (2001–2026) TX 23 (2002–2026) IL 19 (1984–2026) GA 18 (1968–2024) WA 15 (1984–2024) FL 15 (1979–2024) NY 14 (1987–2022) IN 13 (1975–2020) PA 12 (1977–2025) AL 10 (1981–2017) MD 9 (1985–2024) VA 8 (2000–2026) HI 8 (1998–2025) OH 7 (1998–2025) DC 7 (1988–2021) AR 7 (1999–2017) MT 6 (1936–2008) LA 6 (1993–2012) NC 6 (1970–2020) UT 6 (2006–2024) MO 6 (1915–2016) NJ 5 (1978–2021) ID 5 (2015–2020) WI 5 (2009–2026) MI 4 (1918–2016) MS 4 (1987–2005) KY 4 (1949–2022) NE 4 (1987–2019) IA 3 (1992–2018) ND 3 (2012–2025) OR 3 (2002–2024) MN 3 (1992–2019) AK 3 (1988–2022) TN 2 (2007–2024) SC 2 (2019–2022) CO 2 (1973–1998) KS 2 (2011–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check