Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Holland v. Stategreen2 sentences2016See Holland v. State, 358 Ark. 366, 368 , 190 S.W.3d 904, 905 (2004). 2016See Holland v. State, 358 Ark. 366, 368 , 190 S.W.3d 904, 905 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
Tennessee v. Streetgreen1 sentence2008Crawford also recognized, however, that the Confrontation Clause “does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted.” 541 U.S. at 59 n.6 (citing Tennessee v. Street, 471 U.S. 409, 414 (1985)). | 1 | 1 |
Nooner v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See also, Nooner v. State, 322 Ark. 87, 105 , 907 S.W.2d 677 (1995) . 1999See also, Nooner v. State, 322 Ark. 87, 105 , 907 S.W.2d 677 (1995) . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lee v. State
neutral
2 sentences2017Lee v. State, 2015 Ark. 26 , 2015 WL 314353 (per curiam). 2016Lee v. State, 2015 Ark. 26 , 2015 WL 314353 . | 2 | 2016–2017 |
Lee v. State
green
2 sentences2015The State also contends that Mancia mistakenly relies on Lee v. State, 367 Ark. 84 , 238 S.W.3d 52 (2006) where we granted Lee’s motion to recall the mandate due to his counsel’s impairment that was reflected in the record by numerous, specific examples of counsel’s inability to defend his client during the course of the Rule 37 hearing and his counsel’s admission that he suffered from problems with alcohol. 2015The State also contends that Mancia mistakenly relies on Lee v. State, 367 Ark. 84 , 238 S.W.3d 52 (2006) where we granted Lee’s motion to recall the mandate due to his counsel’s impairment that was reflected in the record by numerous, specific examples of counsel’s inability to defend his client during the course of the Rule 37 hearing and his counsel’s admission that he suffered from problems with alcohol. | 2 | 2009–2015 |
Crawford v. Washington
green
1 sentence2008Crawford also recognized, however, that the Confrontation Clause “does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted.” 541 U.S. at 59 n.6 (citing Tennessee v. Street, 471 U.S. 409, 414 (1985)). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Summers v. State
green
1 sentence2008Summers v. State, 90 Ark. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Johnson v. State
green
2 sentences2001Sheridan, 331 Ark. at 4 -5 (quoting from Johnson v. State, 321 Ark. 117 , 900 S.W.2d 940 (1995) (internal quotations and citations omitted). 3 Lee’s brief actually contains only four numbered points on appeal. 2001Sheridan, 331 Ark. at 4 -5 (quoting from Johnson v. State, 321 Ark. 117 , 900 S.W.2d 940 (1995) (internal quotations and citations omitted). 3 Lee’s brief actually contains only four numbered points on appeal. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Sheridan v. State
green
1 sentence2001Sheridan, 331 Ark. at 4 -5 (quoting from Johnson v. State, 321 Ark. 117 , 900 S.W.2d 940 (1995) (internal quotations and citations omitted). 3 Lee’s brief actually contains only four numbered points on appeal. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.