15 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Basin Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Department of Revenuegreen2 sentences2000Power Co-op., Inc., 970 P.2d at 850-51 (footnote omitted): When faced with contested issues of fact, we examine the entire record to determine if the agency's findings are supported by substantial evidence. * * * If so, we do not substitute our judgment for that of the agency and must uphold the factual findings on appeal. * * * Substantial evi-denee is more than a sceintilla of evidence; it is relevant evidence which a reasonable mind might accept in support of the conclusions of the agency. * * * If a conclusion of law is in accord with the law, it is affirmed. * * * We consider three distin 2000Power Co-op., Inc., 970 P.2d at 850-51 (footnote omitted): When faced with contested issues of fact, we examine the entire record to determine if the agency's findings are supported by substantial evidence. * * * If so, we do not substitute our judgment for that of the agency and must uphold the factual findings on appeal. * * * Substantial evidence is more than a scintilla of evidence; it is relevant evidence which a reasonable mind might accept in support of the conclusions of the agency. * * * If a conclusion of law is in accord with the law, it is affirmed. * * * We consider three distinct | 1 | 1 |
Cities Service Oil & Gas Corp. v. Stategreen1 sentence2000Oil & Gas v. State, 838 P.2d 146, 150 (Wyo.1992). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stategreen1 sentence1999Smith v. State, 959 P.2d 1193, 1198 (Wyo.1998); Martinez v. State, 943 P.2d 1178, 1184 (Wyo.1997). | 1 | 1 |
Martinez v. Stategreen1 sentence1999Smith v. State, 959 P.2d 1193, 1198 (Wyo.1998); Martinez v. State, 943 P.2d 1178, 1184 (Wyo.1997). | 1 | 1 |
Robbins v. South Cheyenne Water & Sewage Districtgreen1 sentence1999The Wyoming Supreme Court “has the inherent power, and the duty, to address jurisdictional defects on appeal even though they have not been called to our attention by a litigant.” Robbins v. South Cheyenne Water and Sewage Dist., 792 P.2d 1380, 1384 (Wyo.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Duffy v. Stategreen1 sentence1998Duffy v. State, 789 P.2d 821, 826-27 (Wyo.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Herrig v. Herriggreen1 sentence1998We will sustain a W.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal only when it is certain from the face of the complaint that the plaintiff cannot assert any facts which would entitle him to relief.” Herrig v. Herrig, 844 P.2d 487, 490 (Wyo.1992) (citation omitted), quoted in Davis v. State, 910 P.2d 555, 560 (Wyo.1996). | 1 | 1 |
Sheridan Race Car Ass'n v. Rice Ranchgreen1 sentence1998Sheridan Race Car Ass’n v. Rice Ranch, 864 P.2d 30, 32 (Wyo.1993). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Stategreen1 sentence1998We will sustain a W.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal only when it is certain from the face of the complaint that the plaintiff cannot assert any facts which would entitle him to relief.” Herrig v. Herrig, 844 P.2d 487, 490 (Wyo.1992) (citation omitted), quoted in Davis v. State, 910 P.2d 555, 560 (Wyo.1996). | 1 | 1 |
True Oil Co. v. Sinclair Oil Corp.green1 sentence1996True Oil Co. v. Sinclair Oil Corp., 771 P.2d 781, 795 (Wyo.1989); Kaiser v. Farnsworth Drilling Co., Inc., 851 P.2d 1292, 1295 (Wyo.1993). | 1 | 1 |
Kaiser v. Farnsworth Drilling Co., Inc.green1 sentence1996True Oil Co. v. Sinclair Oil Corp., 771 P.2d 781, 795 (Wyo.1989); Kaiser v. Farnsworth Drilling Co., Inc., 851 P.2d 1292, 1295 (Wyo.1993). | 1 | 1 |
Taul v. Stategreen1 sentence1995Taul v. State, 862 P.2d 649, 657 (Wyo.1993) (quoting Saldana v. State, 846 P.2d 604, 619 (Wyo.1993)); see also Springfield v. State, 860 P.2d 435, 449 (Wyo.1993). | 1 | 1 |
Springfield v. Stategreen1 sentence1995Taul v. State, 862 P.2d 649, 657 (Wyo.1993) (quoting Saldana v. State, 846 P.2d 604, 619 (Wyo.1993)); see also Springfield v. State, 860 P.2d 435, 449 (Wyo.1993). | 1 | 1 |
Saldana v. Stategreen1 sentence1995Taul v. State, 862 P.2d 649, 657 (Wyo.1993) (quoting Saldana v. State, 846 P.2d 604, 619 (Wyo.1993)); see also Springfield v. State, 860 P.2d 435, 449 (Wyo.1993). | 1 | 1 |
Montana Dakota Utilities Co. v. Public Service Commissiongreen1 sentence1993Montana Dakota Utilities v. PSC, 847 P.2d 978, 982 (Wyo.1993) A reviewing court has authority to: (ii) Hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings and conclusions found to be: (A) Arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law; (B) Contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege or immunity; (C) In excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority or limitations or lacking statutory right; (D) Without observance of procedure required by law; or (E) Unsupported by substantial evidence in a case reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by s | 1 | 1 |
Oien v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Thus a person is not guilty of a crime if he commits an act or omits to act under an honest and reasonable belief in the existence of certain facts and circumstances which, if true, should make such act or omission lawful. *522 STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review for a requested but refused jury instruction is established by Oien v. State, 797 P.2d 544, 547 (Wyo. 1990) and Thom v. State, 792 P.2d 192, 195 (Wyo.1990). 1992STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review for a requested but refused jury instruction is established by Oien v. State, 797 P.2d 544, 547 (Wyo.1990) and Thom v. State, 792 P.2d 192, 195 (Wyo.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Thom v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Thus a person is not guilty of a crime if he commits an act or omits to act under an honest and reasonable belief in the existence of certain facts and circumstances which, if true, should make such act or omission lawful. *522 STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review for a requested but refused jury instruction is established by Oien v. State, 797 P.2d 544, 547 (Wyo. 1990) and Thom v. State, 792 P.2d 192, 195 (Wyo.1990). 1992STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review for a requested but refused jury instruction is established by Oien v. State, 797 P.2d 544, 547 (Wyo.1990) and Thom v. State, 792 P.2d 192, 195 (Wyo.1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jennifer Moore, d/b/a Silly Bear Daycare, and Willie Moore, III
green
1 sentence2016Moore v. Wolititch, 2015 WY 11, ¶ 9 , 841 P.3d 421 , 428 (Wyo.2015), Additionally, [tlhe factual findings of a judge are not entitled to the limited review afforded a Jury verdict, While the findings are presumptively correct, the appellate court may examine all of the properly admissible evidence in the record. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Reavis v. Reavis
green
1 sentence1999STANDARD OF REVIEW Our standard of review in domestic relation matters was succinctly stated in Reavis v. Reavis, 955 P.2d 428 (Wyo.1998): Custody, visitation, child support, and alimony are all committed to the sound discretion of the district court. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Hornecker v. State
green
1 sentence1999STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel was recently stated in Hornecker v. State, 977 P.2d 1289 (Wyo.1999): In order to prevail on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, [Appellant] must make the dual showings that his counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficient performance prejudiced his defense. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences1997III.STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review for determining ineffective assistance of counsel was articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984): *546 First, the defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient. 1997III.STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review for determining ineffective assistance of counsel was articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984): *546 First, the defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Farr v. Link
green
1 sentence1994Baros v. Wells, 780 P.2d 341 (Wyo.1989); Farr v. Link, 746 P.2d 431 (Wyo.1987). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Baros v. Wells
green
1 sentence1994Baros v. Wells, 780 P.2d 341 (Wyo.1989); Farr v. Link, 746 P.2d 431 (Wyo.1987). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.