Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Marriage of Landry
green
2 sentences2026With regard to review of dissolution proceedings, the supreme court has observed that “[t]he emotional and financial interests affected by such decisions are best served by finality.” In re Marriage of Landry, 103 Wn.2d 807, 809 , 699 P.2d 214 (1985). 2026With regard to review of dissolution proceedings, the supreme court has observed that “[t]he emotional and financial interests affected by such decisions are best served by finality.” In re Marriage of Landry, 103 Wn.2d 807, 809 , 699 P.2d 214 (1985). | 4 | 2021–2026 |
State v. Homan
red
2 sentences2018State v. Homan, 181 Wn.2d 102, 105 , 330 P.3d 182 (2014). 2018State v. Homan, 181 Wn.2d 102, 105 , 330 P.3d 182 (2014). | 3 | 2018–2018 |
Hertog v. City of Seattle
green
2 sentences2004Hertog v. City of Seattle, 138 Wn.2d 265, 275 , 979 P.2d 400 (1999); Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wn.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). 2004Hertog v. City of Seattle, 138 Wn.2d 265, 275 , 979 P.2d 400 (1999); Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wn.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Bishop v. Miche
green
2 sentences2004Hertog v. City of Seattle, 138 Wn.2d 265, 275 , 979 P.2d 400 (1999); Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wn.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). 2004Hertog v. City of Seattle, 138 Wn.2d 265, 275 , 979 P.2d 400 (1999); Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wn.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). | 2 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Roberts
green
2 sentences2026State v. Roberts, 5 Wn.3d 222 , 231, 572 P.3d 1191 (2025). 2026State v. Roberts, 5 Wn.3d 222 , 231, 572 P.3d 1191 (2025). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Scanlan
green
2 sentences2025State v. Scanlan, 193 Wn.2d 753, 770 , 445 P.3d 960 (2019). 2025State v. Scanlan, 193 Wn.2d 753, 770 , 445 P.3d 960 (2019). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Chapman v. California
yellow
2 sentences2015The Supreme Court held in Chapman v. California that "before a federal constitutional error can be held harmless, the court must be able to declare a belief that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S. Ct. 2 As explained below, we accept for the purposes of this opinion the State's concession that the court's instruction was erroneous. 3 State v. Barry (Robert), No. 89976-2 824, 17 L. 2015The Supreme Court held in Chapman v. California that "before a federal constitutional error can be held harmless, the court must be able to declare a belief that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S. Ct. 2 As explained below, we accept for the purposes of this opinion the State's concession that the court's instruction was erroneous. 3 State v. Barry (Robert), No. 89976-2 824, 17 L. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Brightman
green
2 sentences2014State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 9 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012); State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 517-18 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005) ("defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial did not effect a waiver of the public trial right" (citing State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 257 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995))). 2014State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 9 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012); State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 517-18 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005) ("defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial did not effect a waiver of the public trial right" (citing State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 257 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995))). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Bone-Club
green
2 sentences2014State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 9 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012); State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 517-18 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005) ("defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial did not effect a waiver of the public trial right" (citing State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 257 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995))). 2014State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 9 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012); State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 517-18 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005) ("defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial did not effect a waiver of the public trial right" (citing State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 257 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995))). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Wise
green
2 sentences2014State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 9 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012); State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 517-18 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005) ("defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial did not effect a waiver of the public trial right" (citing State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 257 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995))). 2014State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 9 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012); State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 517-18 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005) ("defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial did not effect a waiver of the public trial right" (citing State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 257 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995))). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Morales v. Westinghouse Hanford Co.
green
2 sentences2003Morales v. Westinghouse Hanford Co., 73 Wash.App. 367 , 869 P.2d 120 (1994). 2003Morales v. Westinghouse Hanford Co., 73 Wash.App. 367 , 869 P.2d 120 (1994). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Potts
green
2 sentences2002State v. Potts, 93 Wash.App. 82, 86 , 969 P.2d 494 (1998); State v. Bridge, 91 Wash.App. 98, 100 , 955 P.2d 418 (1998). 2002State v. Potts, 93 Wash.App. 82, 86 , 969 P.2d 494 (1998); State v. Bridge, 91 Wash.App. 98, 100 , 955 P.2d 418 (1998). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Bridge
green
2 sentences2002State v. Potts, 93 Wash.App. 82, 86 , 969 P.2d 494 (1998); State v. Bridge, 91 Wash.App. 98, 100 , 955 P.2d 418 (1998). 2002State v. Potts, 93 Wash.App. 82, 86 , 969 P.2d 494 (1998); State v. Bridge, 91 Wash.App. 98, 100 , 955 P.2d 418 (1998). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.