14 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Marriage of Landry
green
2 sentences2026With regard to review of dissolution proceedings, the supreme court has observed that “[t]he emotional and financial interests affected by such decisions are best served by finality.” In re Marriage of Landry, 103 Wn.2d 807, 809 , 699 P.2d 214 (1985). 2026With regard to review of dissolution proceedings, the supreme court has observed that “[t]he emotional and financial interests affected by such decisions are best served by finality.” In re Marriage of Landry, 103 Wn.2d 807, 809 , 699 P.2d 214 (1985). | 4 | 2021–2026 |
State v. Homan
red
2 sentences2018State v. Homan, 181 Wn.2d 102, 105 , 330 P.3d 182 (2014). 2018State v. Homan, 181 Wn.2d 102, 105 , 330 P.3d 182 (2014). | 3 | 2018–2018 |
Bishop v. Miche
green
2 sentences2004Hertog v. City of Seattle, 138 Wash.2d 265, 275 , 979 P.2d 400 (1999); Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wash.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). 2004Hertog v. City of Seattle, 138 Wn.2d 265, 275 , 979 P.2d 400 (1999); Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wn.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Hertog v. City of Seattle
green
2 sentences2004Hertog v. City of Seattle, 138 Wash.2d 265, 275 , 979 P.2d 400 (1999); Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wash.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). 2004Hertog v. City of Seattle, 138 Wn.2d 265, 275 , 979 P.2d 400 (1999); Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wn.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). | 2 | 2004–2004 |
HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of Seattle
green
2 sentences2004Hertog v. City of Seattle, 138 Wash.2d 265, 275 , 979 P.2d 400 (1999); Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wash.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). 2004Hertog v. City of Seattle, 138 Wn.2d 265, 275 , 979 P.2d 400 (1999); Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wn.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Bishop v. Miche
green
2 sentences2004Hertog v. City of Seattle, 138 Wash.2d 265, 275 , 979 P.2d 400 (1999); Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wash.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). 2004Hertog v. City of Seattle, 138 Wn.2d 265, 275 , 979 P.2d 400 (1999); Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wn.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). | 2 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Scanlan
green
2 sentences2025State v. Scanlan, 193 Wn.2d 753, 770 , 445 P.3d 960 (2019). 2025State v. Scanlan, 193 Wn.2d 753, 770 , 445 P.3d 960 (2019). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Chapman v. California
red
2 sentences2015The Supreme Court held in Chapman v. California that "before a federal constitutional error can be held harmless, the court must be able to declare a belief that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S. Ct. 2 As explained below, we accept for the purposes of this opinion the State's concession that the court's instruction was erroneous. 3 State v. Barry (Robert), No. 89976-2 824, 17 L. 2015The Supreme Court held in Chapman v. California that "before a federal constitutional error can be held harmless, the court must be able to declare a belief that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S. Ct. 2 As explained below, we accept for the purposes of this opinion the State's concession that the court's instruction was erroneous. 3 State v. Barry (Robert), No. 89976-2 824, 17 L. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Bone-Club
green
1 sentence2014State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 9 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012); State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 517-18 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005) ("defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial did not effect a waiver of the public trial right" (citing State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 257 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995))). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Brightman
green
1 sentence2014State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 9 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012); State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 517-18 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005) ("defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial did not effect a waiver of the public trial right" (citing State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 257 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995))). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Bone-Club
green
1 sentence2014State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 9 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012); State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 517-18 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005) ("defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial did not effect a waiver of the public trial right" (citing State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 257 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995))). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Wise
green
2 sentences2014State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 9 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012); State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 517-18 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005) ("defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial did not effect a waiver of the public trial right" (citing State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 257 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995))). 2014State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 9 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012); State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 517-18 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005) ("defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial did not effect a waiver of the public trial right" (citing State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 257 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995))). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Brightman
green
1 sentence2014State v. Wise, 176 Wn.2d 1, 9 , 288 P.3d 1113 (2012); State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 517-18 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005) ("defendant's failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection at trial did not effect a waiver of the public trial right" (citing State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 257 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995))). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Morales v. Westinghouse Hanford Co.
green
2 sentences2003Morales v. Westinghouse Hanford Co., 73 Wash.App. 367 , 869 P.2d 120 (1994). 2003Morales v. Westinghouse Hanford Co., 73 Wash.App. 367 , 869 P.2d 120 (1994). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Bridge
green
1 sentence2002State v. Potts, 93 Wash.App. 82, 86 , 969 P.2d 494 (1998); State v. Bridge, 91 Wash.App. 98, 100 , 955 P.2d 418 (1998). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Potts
green
2 sentences2002State v. Potts, 93 Wash.App. 82, 86 , 969 P.2d 494 (1998); State v. Bridge, 91 Wash.App. 98, 100 , 955 P.2d 418 (1998). 2002State v. Potts, 93 Wash.App. 82, 86 , 969 P.2d 494 (1998); State v. Bridge, 91 Wash.App. 98, 100 , 955 P.2d 418 (1998). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Bridge
green
1 sentence2002State v. Potts, 93 Wash.App. 82, 86 , 969 P.2d 494 (1998); State v. Bridge, 91 Wash.App. 98, 100 , 955 P.2d 418 (1998). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.