Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alaska opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lewis v. Lewisgreen1 sentence2022DISCUSSION Ditsworth contends that the superior court erred by failing to enforce the original child support payment agreement between her and Weihing, including the age- out clause, set out in the 1978 child support order.9 CSSD contends that the court’s 1979 7 370 P.3d 1070, 1077 (Alaska 2016). 8 Spott v. Spott, 17 P.3d 52, 55 (Alaska 2001). 9 See Lewis v. Lewis, 285 P.3d 273, 275 (Alaska 2012) (explaining that if parties agree to be bound by an agreement, then original “agreement controls if it is otherwise enforceable”). -7- 1928 order, excluding the age-out clause, superseded the 1978 ord | 1 | 1 |
Mitchell v. Mitchellgreen1 sentence2022DISCUSSION Ditsworth contends that the superior court erred by failing to enforce the original child support payment agreement between her and Weihing, including the age- out clause, set out in the 1978 child support order.9 CSSD contends that the court’s 1979 7 370 P.3d 1070, 1077 (Alaska 2016). 8 Spott v. Spott, 17 P.3d 52, 55 (Alaska 2001). 9 See Lewis v. Lewis, 285 P.3d 273, 275 (Alaska 2012) (explaining that if parties agree to be bound by an agreement, then original “agreement controls if it is otherwise enforceable”). -7- 1928 order, excluding the age-out clause, superseded the 1978 ord | 1 | 1 |
Spott v. Spottgreen1 sentence2022DISCUSSION Ditsworth contends that the superior court erred by failing to enforce the original child support payment agreement between her and Weihing, including the age- out clause, set out in the 1978 child support order.9 CSSD contends that the court’s 1979 7 370 P.3d 1070, 1077 (Alaska 2016). 8 Spott v. Spott, 17 P.3d 52, 55 (Alaska 2001). 9 See Lewis v. Lewis, 285 P.3d 273, 275 (Alaska 2012) (explaining that if parties agree to be bound by an agreement, then original “agreement controls if it is otherwise enforceable”). -7- 1928 order, excluding the age-out clause, superseded the 1978 ord | 1 | 1 |
Buoy v. ERA Helicopters, Inc.green1 sentence1991“The grant or refusal of a motion for a new trial rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and we will not disturb the trial court’s decision on such a motion except in exceptional circumstances to prevent a miscarriage of justice.” Buoy v. ERA Helicopters, Inc., 771 P.2d 439, 442 (Alaska 1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Farmer v. State
green
2 sentences1993Farmer v. State, 788 P.2d 43 , 46 n. 8 (Alaska 1990). 1993Farmer v. State, 788 P.2d 43 , 46 n. 8 (Alaska 1990). | 2 | 1993–1993 |
Societe Financial, LLC d/b/a Alaska ATM, and James Dainis, individually v. MJ Corporation d/b/a Shell and 15th Grill
green
1 sentence2025There are several different standards of review, each giving different weight to the trial court’s decisions. 10 Societe Fin., LLC v. MJ Corp., 542 P.3d 1159 , 1165 (Alaska 2024). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.