19 Virgin Islands opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virgin Islands courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blyden v. Peoplegreen2 sentences2016Rodriguez v. Bureau of Corr., 58 V.I. 367, 371 (V.I. 2011); Blyden v. People, 53 V.I. 637, 646-47 (V.I. 2010). “[T]he appellate court must accept the factual determination of the fact finder unless that determination ‘either (1) is completely devoid of minimum evidentiary support displaying some hue of credibility, or (2) bears no rational relationship to the supportive evidentiary data.’ ” St. 2014Rodriguez v. Bureau of Corr., 58 V.I. 367, 371 (V.I. 2011); Blyden v. People, 53 V.I. 637, 646-47 (V.I. 2010); Pell v. E.I. | 14 | 14 |
Rodriguez v. Bureau of Correctionsgreen2 sentences2016Rodriguez v. Bureau of Corr., 58 V.I. 367, 371 (V.I. 2011); Blyden v. People, 53 V.I. 637, 646-47 (V.I. 2010). “[T]he appellate court must accept the factual determination of the fact finder unless that determination ‘either (1) is completely devoid of minimum evidentiary support displaying some hue of credibility, or (2) bears no rational relationship to the supportive evidentiary data.’ ” St. 2014Rodriguez v. Bureau of Corr., 58 V.I. 367, 371 (V.I. 2011); Blyden v. People, 53 V.I. 637, 646-47 (V.I. 2010); Pell v. E.I. | 9 | 9 |
Martin v. Martingreen2 sentences2016Martin v. Martin, 58 V.I. 620, 624-25 (V.I. 2013) (citations omitted). 2016Martin v. Martin, 58 V.I. 620, 624-25 (V.I. 2013). | 2 | 2 |
Simmonds v. Peoplegreen2 sentences2013Simmonds v. People, 53 V.I. 549, 555 (V.I. 2010). 2011Simmonds v. People, 53 V.I. 549, 555 (V.I. 2010) IV.DISCUSSION Farrington presents four issues on appeal; however, we consider the issues regarding the sufficiency of the evidence and the identification of the defendant to have been waived because Farrington presented no argument concerning these issues in his brief filed in this Court as required by Virgin Islands Supreme Court Rule 22(a)(5). 3 In re Guardianship of Smith, 54 V.I. 517, 524 (V.I. 2010); See also, Nagle v. Alspach, 8 F.3d 141 , 143 (3d Cir. 1993). | 2 | 2 |
cluster 656112green1 sentence2011Simmonds v. People, 53 V.I. 549, 555 (V.I. 2010) IV.DISCUSSION Farrington presents four issues on appeal; however, we consider the issues regarding the sufficiency of the evidence and the identification of the defendant to have been waived because Farrington presented no argument concerning these issues in his brief filed in this Court as required by Virgin Islands Supreme Court Rule 22(a)(5). 3 In re Guardianship of Smith, 54 V.I. 517, 524 (V.I. 2010); See also, Nagle v. Alspach, 8 F.3d 141 , 143 (3d Cir. 1993). | 1 | 1 |
In re the Guardianship of Smithgreen1 sentence2011Simmonds v. People, 53 V.I. 549, 555 (V.I. 2010) IV.DISCUSSION Farrington presents four issues on appeal; however, we consider the issues regarding the sufficiency of the evidence and the identification of the defendant to have been waived because Farrington presented no argument concerning these issues in his brief filed in this Court as required by Virgin Islands Supreme Court Rule 22(a)(5). 3 In re Guardianship of Smith, 54 V.I. 517, 524 (V.I. 2010); See also, Nagle v. Alspach, 8 F.3d 141 , 143 (3d Cir. 1993). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Abraham Nee Ntrehgreen1 sentence2005STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review for a Motion for a Judgment of Acquittal pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(c) is found in United States v. Ntreh, 45 V.I. 416, 417-18 (D.V.I. 2003). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virgin Islands. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.