14 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1859–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Fountaingreen2 sentences2018State v. Fountain, 786 N.W.2d 260, 262-63 (Iowa 2010). 2017State v. Fountain, 786 N.W.2d 260, 262-63 (Iowa 2010). | 3 | 3 |
State of Iowa v. Warren William Lovellgreen1 sentence2020“To protect the integrity of our judicial system from the appearance of impropriety, [I would] vacate the defendant’s sentence and remand the case to the district court for resentencing before a different judge.” State v. Lovell, 857 N.W.2d 241, 243 (Iowa 2014). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Brueggergreen1 sentence2015State v. Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d 862, 872 (Iowa 2009). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Allengreen1 sentence2014State v. Allen, 708 N.W.2d 361, 365 (Iowa 2006). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Beck v. Fleener
green
1 sentence1990In Fleener , the plaintiffs had filed a motion for new trial, alleging an error in an instruction. 376 N.W.2d at 595-96 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
People v. Bostick
green
2 sentences1966We have carefully considered People v. Bostick, 62 Cal.2d 820 , 44 Cal. Rptr. 649 , 402 P.2d 529 , and People v. Robinson, 62 Cal.2d 889 , 44 Cal. Rptr. 762 , 402 P.2d 834 , cited by the State in support of its argument the error in instruction 14 was harmless. 1966We have carefully considered People v. Bostick, 62 Cal.2d 820 , 44 Cal. Rptr. 649 , 402 P.2d 529 , and People v. Robinson, 62 Cal.2d 889 , 44 Cal. Rptr. 762 , 402 P.2d 834 , cited by the State in support of its argument the error in instruction 14 was harmless. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
People v. Robinson
green
2 sentences1966We have carefully considered People v. Bostick, 62 Cal.2d 820 , 44 Cal. Rptr. 649 , 402 P.2d 529 , and People v. Robinson, 62 Cal.2d 889 , 44 Cal. Rptr. 762 , 402 P.2d 834 , cited by the State in support of its argument the error in instruction 14 was harmless. 1966We have carefully considered People v. Bostick, 62 Cal.2d 820 , 44 Cal. Rptr. 649 , 402 P.2d 529 , and People v. Robinson, 62 Cal.2d 889 , 44 Cal. Rptr. 762 , 402 P.2d 834 , cited by the State in support of its argument the error in instruction 14 was harmless. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Lawlor v. Gaylord
green
2 sentences1947On the claim that the undisputed testimony shows that the evidence here generates a question for the jury, plaintiff, among others, cites Taylor v. Wistey, supra, which involved an error in instruction as to not looking forward and back; Armbruster v. Gray, supra, which seems to be contrary to plaintiff’s contention; McElhinney v. Knittle, supra; Herdman v. Zwart, supra, which was a street-crossing case; Lawlor v. Gaylord, 233 Iowa 834 , 10 N. W. 2d 531 , which was a crossing case; Schwind v. Gibson, 220 Iowa 377 , 260 N. W. 853 , a guest case which involved a collision between a standing car 1947On the claim that the undisputed testimony shows that the evidence here generates a question for the jury, plaintiff, among others, cites Taylor v. Wistey, supra, which involved an error in instruction as to not looking forward and back; Armbruster v. Gray, supra, which seems to be contrary to plaintiff’s contention; McElhinney v. Knittle, supra; Herdman v. Zwart, supra, which was a street-crossing case; Lawlor v. Gaylord, 233 Iowa 834 , 10 N. W. 2d 531 , which was a crossing case; Schwind v. Gibson, 220 Iowa 377 , 260 N. W. 853 , a guest case which involved a collision between a standing car | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Schwind v. Gibson
green
2 sentences1947On the claim that the undisputed testimony shows that the evidence here generates a question for the jury, plaintiff, among others, cites Taylor v. Wistey, supra, which involved an error in instruction as to not looking forward and back; Armbruster v. Gray, supra, which seems to be contrary to plaintiff’s contention; McElhinney v. Knittle, supra; Herdman v. Zwart, supra, which was a street-crossing case; Lawlor v. Gaylord, 233 Iowa 834 , 10 N. W. 2d 531 , which was a crossing case; Schwind v. Gibson, 220 Iowa 377 , 260 N. W. 853 , a guest case which involved a collision between a standing car 1947On the claim that the undisputed testimony shows that the evidence here generates a question for the jury, plaintiff, among others, cites Taylor v. Wistey, supra, which involved an error in instruction as to not looking forward and back; Armbruster v. Gray, supra, which seems to be contrary to plaintiff’s contention; McElhinney v. Knittle, supra; Herdman v. Zwart, supra, which was a street-crossing case; Lawlor v. Gaylord, 233 Iowa 834 , 10 N. W. 2d 531 , which was a crossing case; Schwind v. Gibson, 220 Iowa 377 , 260 N. W. 853 , a guest case which involved a collision between a standing car | 1 | 1947–1947 |
State v. Delanty
green
1 sentence1932In the case of State v. Delanty, 211 Iowa 50 , the more recent cases on the subject are reviewed and extensive quotations are made therefrom, after which this court said: “Enough has been quoted from previous cases to indicate the error in the instruction under consideration. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Delvee v. Boardman
green
1 sentence1907On the error in the instruction, see the following cases: Delvee v. Boardman, 20 Iowa, 446 ; Franks v. State, 1 G. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Sherman v. Western Stage Co.
green
1 sentence1902Sherman v. Stage Co., 24 Iowa 515 .” The precedent cited is controlling, and the error in the instruction as given must be considered as prejudicial. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Martin v. Capital Insurance
green
2 sentences1896It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that such a division and removal of the goods would of themselves increase the rate, or the hazard. 1 Wood, Ins. sections 241-260; Martin v. Insurance Co., 85 Iowa, 643 ( 52 N. W. 1896It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that such a division and removal of the goods would of themselves increase the rate, or the hazard. 1 Wood, Ins. sections 241-260; Martin v. Insurance Co., 85 Iowa, 643 ( 52 N. W. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Foley v. McKeegan
green
1 sentence1859The court below instructed the jury “that the bond sued on has liquidated, and fixed the damages for a breach of the same, at two hundred dollars.” This court, following Foley v. McKeegan 4 Iowa, 1 , and Sweem v. Steele, 5 Ib. 352; [and Lord v. Gaddis, ante] held that “the bond is to be treated as- a penalty and not as liquidated or fixed damages.” The judgment below was reversed for the error in the instruction of the court. | 1 | 1859–1859 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.