14 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Solem v. Helmred2 sentences1999August claims we must apply the three-factor test set out in Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 , 103 S.Ct. 3001 , 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983), to determine whether his sentence violates the Eighth Amendment. 1999August claims we must apply the three-factor test set out in Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 , 103 S.Ct. 3001 , 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983), to determine whether his sentence violates the Eighth Amendment. | 2 | 3 |
McMurry v. Eckertgreen2 sentences2024App. Ct. 2021) (adopting the Shelton test); McMurry v. Eckert, 833 S.W.2d 828, 830 (Ky. 1992) (“In our view, [Shelton and Hickman, 329 U.S. at 512–13,] address this issue appropriately and provide the proper standard.”); Club Vista Fin. 2024App. Ct. 2021) (adopting the Shelton test); McMurry v. Eckert, 833 S.W.2d 828, 830 (Ky. 1992) (“In our view, [Shelton and Hickman, 329 U.S. at 512–13,] address this issue appropriately and provide the proper standard.”); Club Vista Fin. | 2 | 2 |
Airy's Inc. v. Hillgreen2 sentences2024Ct. App. 2018) (“Where the deposition of opposing counsel is at issue, the party seeking such a deposition has the burden of meeting the three-factor test outlined in [Shelton].”); Airy’s, Inc. v. Hill, 193 N.E.3d 107, 111 (Ill. 2024Ct. App. 2018) (“Where the deposition of opposing counsel is it issue, the party seeking such a deposition has the burden of meeting the three-factor test outlined in [Shelton].”); Airy’s, Inc. v. Hill, 193 N.E.3d 107, 111 (Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Sanford v. Manternachgreen2 sentences2009In Sanford v. Manternach, 601 N.W.2d 360, 364 (Iowa 1999), we declared that a liberty interest in accrued credits is created by Iowa’s law providing for earned-time credits. 2009In Sanford v. Manternach, 601 N.W.2d 360, 364 (Iowa 1999), we declared that a liberty interest in accrued credits is created by Iowa’s law providing for earned- time credits. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Richgreen1 sentence2016Moreover our court has previously concluded the supreme court did not announce a new rule in Robinson but rather only clarified existing law by its reliance upon the three-factor test announced in State v. Rich, 305 N.W.2d 739, 741-42 (Iowa 1981). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2015Id. at 146. 2015Id. at 146 . | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Charles James David Olivergreen1 sentence2014State v. Oliver, 812 N.W.2d 636, 647 (Iowa 2012) (citing Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277, 292 , 103 S. Ct. 3001, 3011 , 77 L. | 1 | 1 |
Tragarz v. Keene Corporationgreen1 sentence1994See Tragarz v. Keene Corp., 980 F.2d 411, 420-21 (7th Cir.1992) (application of the three prongs may vary under different circumstances). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences1989Under the three-factor analysis explained in State v. Williams, 285 N.W.2d 248, 267 (Iowa 1979), we find no abuse. 1989Under the three-factor analysis explained in State v. Williams, 285 N.W.2d 248, 267 (Iowa 1979), we find no abuse. | 1 | 1 |
Chevron Oil Co. v. Husonred2 sentences1989In Beeck , we examined the retrospective application of the Weitl parental consortium rule by applying a three-factor test derived from the United States Supreme Court in Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97, 106-07 , 92 S.Ct. 349, 355 , 30 L.Ed.2d 296, 306 (1971) (test adopted to determine retroactivity). 1989In Beeck , we examined the retrospective application of the Weitl parental consortium rule by applying a three-factor test derived from the United States Supreme Court in Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97, 106-07 , 92 S.Ct. 349, 355 , 30 L.Ed.2d 296, 306 (1971) (test adopted to determine retroactivity). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hickman v. Taylor
green
2 sentences2024App. Ct. 2021) (adopting the Shelton test); McMurry v. Eckert, 833 S.W.2d 828, 830 (Ky. 1992) (“In our view, [Shelton and Hickman, 329 U.S. at 512–13,] address this issue appropriately and provide the proper standard.”); Club Vista Fin. 2024App. Ct. 2021) (adopting the Shelton test); McMurry v. Eckert, 833 S.W.2d 828, 830 (Ky. 1992) (“In our view, [Shelton and Hickman, 329 U.S. at 512–13,] address this issue appropriately and provide the proper standard.”); Club Vista Fin. | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Bowers v. Polk County Board of Supervisors
green
2 sentences2009A procedure does not necessarily violate due process simply “ ‘ “because another method may seem fairer or wiser.” ’ ” Id. at 666 (quoting Bowers, 638 N.W.2d at 691 ). 12 To determine what process is due, the court undertakes a three factor analysis: “ ‘First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and adminis 2009A procedure does not necessarily violate due process simply “ ‘ “because another method may seem fairer or wiser.” ’ ” Id. at 666 (quoting Bowers, 638 N.W.2d at 691 ). 12 To determine what process is due, the court undertakes a three factor analysis: “ ‘First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and adminis | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Beeck v. S.R. Smith Co.
green
2 sentences2019Id. 2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
In RE the Detention of Paul Michael Blaise Paul Michael Blaise
green
1 sentence2015Based on the three-factor test found in Blaise, 830 N.W.2d at 319 , we conclude it would be inappropriate for us to engage in a sua sponte harmless- error review. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.