14 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1948–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ackerson v. Clarendon National Insurance Co.green2 sentences2009See id. 2009See id. | 3 | 3 |
Robinson v. Robinsongreen2 sentences2004Prior to the effective date of rule 13.1, the supreme court in Rogers , a default judgment case, quoted with approval a prior supreme court holding that when “‘an appellant exercises due diligence and through no fault of his own is unable to obtain a proper record of the evidence introduced, this may require a new trial where his right to have the case reviewed on appeal can be preserved in no other way.’” 561 S.W.2d at 173 -74 (quoting Robinson v. Robinson , 487 S.W.2d 713, 715 (Tex. 1972)). 2004Prior to the effective date of rule 13.1, the supreme court in Rogers , a default judgment case, quoted with approval a prior supreme court holding that when “‘an appellant exercises due diligence and through no fault of his own is unable to obtain a proper record of the evidence introduced, this may require a new trial where his right to have the case reviewed on appeal can be preserved in no other way.’” 561 S.W.2d at 173 -74 (quoting Robinson v. Robinson , 487 S.W.2d 713, 715 (Tex. 1972)). | 3 | 3 |
Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. Catesgreen2 sentences2014See id. 2014See id. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Continental Airlines, Inc.green1 sentence2025But that did not occur here and should become unlikely in the future as time and limitations pass.20 ETC points out correctly that chapter 25A does not explicitly say it applies “only” to cases commenced on or after September 1, 2024, and for cases 17 Id. § 25A.006(g). 18 See, e.g., In re Cont’l Airlines, Inc., 988 S.W.2d 733, 735 (Tex. 1998). 19 See Morath v. Lewis, 601 S.W.3d 785 , 787 (Tex. 2020). 20 The general tolling provision would not apply to such actions since it is limited to cases dismissed “because of lack of jurisdiction in the trial court where the action was first filed.” TEX. | 1 | 1 |
McQueen v. McCanless, Com'r.green1 sentence2004Prior to the effective date of rule 13.1, the supreme court in Rogers , a default judgment case, quoted with approval a prior supreme court holding that when *188 “ ‘an appellant exercises due diligence and through no fault of his own is unable to obtain a proper record of the evidence introduced, this may require a new trial where his right to have the case reviewed on appeal can be preserved in no other way.’ ” 561 S.W.2d at 173 -74 (quoting Robinson v. Robinson, 487 S.W.2d 713, 715 (Tex.1972)). *187 S.W.2d at 630-32, and that dismissal for the sole reason that Avcom was not represented by c | 1 | 1 |
Dubai Petroleum Co. v. Kazigreen1 sentence2001This issue is not before us, however, and must be urged in the trial court. [2] See Dubai Petroleum Co. v. Kazi, 12 S.W.3d 71, 73 (Tex.2000). [1] I follow the lead of Justice Kidd's concurring opinion in referring to Justice Jones's opinion as the "majority opinion." [2] The Administrative Procedure Act is found in sections 2001.001 through 2001.902 of the Texas Government Code. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rogers v. Rogers
green
2 sentences2004Prior to the effective date of rule 13.1, the supreme court in Rogers , a default judgment case, quoted with approval a prior supreme court holding that when “‘an appellant exercises due diligence and through no fault of his own is unable to obtain a proper record of the evidence introduced, this may require a new trial where his right to have the case reviewed on appeal can be preserved in no other way.’” 561 S.W.2d at 173 -74 (quoting Robinson v. Robinson , 487 S.W.2d 713, 715 (Tex. 1972)). 2004Prior to the effective date of rule 13.1, the supreme court in Rogers , a default judgment case, quoted with approval a prior supreme court holding that when “‘an appellant exercises due diligence and through no fault of his own is unable to obtain a proper record of the evidence introduced, this may require a new trial where his right to have the case reviewed on appeal can be preserved in no other way.’” 561 S.W.2d at 173 -74 (quoting Robinson v. Robinson , 487 S.W.2d 713, 715 (Tex. 1972)). | 3 | 2004–2004 |
RAILROAD COM'N OF TEXAS v. WBD Oil & Gas
green
2 sentences2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 8 Railroad Com’n of Texas v. WBD Oil & Gas Co., 104 S.W.3d 69 (2003) 159 Oil & Gas Rep. 122 , 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 442 to contest a rule on the ground of noncompliance with the procedural requirements of [specified sections] not later than the second anniversary of the effective date of the rule.”). 42 Id. § 2001.172 (“The scope of judicial review of a state agency decision in a contested case is as provided by the law under which review is sought.”). 43 Id. § 2001.173(a) (“If the manner of review authorized by law for the decision in a contested case 2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 8 Railroad Com’n of Texas v. WBD Oil & Gas Co., 104 S.W.3d 69 (2003) 159 Oil & Gas Rep. 122 , 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 442 to contest a rule on the ground of noncompliance with the procedural requirements of [specified sections] not later than the second anniversary of the effective date of the rule.”). 42 Id. § 2001.172 (“The scope of judicial review of a state agency decision in a contested case is as provided by the law under which review is sought.”). 43 Id. § 2001.173(a) (“If the manner of review authorized by law for the decision in a contested case | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Villanueva v. State
green
1 sentence1999According to the court of criminal appeals, we must apply the new *272 rules to any case pending on September 1, 1997, the effective date of rule 25.2(b)(3), Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, unless that application “would not be feasible or would work injustice.” See Court of Criminal Appeals Final Approval, 60 Tex. B.J. 876 (Tex.Crim.App.Aug.1997); Villanueva v. State, 977 S.W.2d 693 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1998, no pet.). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Geesa v. State
red
1 sentence1996Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d at 793-94 ; Collins, 640 S.W.2d at 290-91 . 1 . "[A]pplying the new rule to all cases then pending on direct review or not yet final, as well as [to the parties in the case in which the new rule is announced and to those cases tried after the effective date of the rule].” Geesa, 820 S.W.2d at 163 n. 13. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Apolinar v. State
green
1 sentence1996Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d at 793-94 ; Collins, 640 S.W.2d at 290-91 . 1 . "[A]pplying the new rule to all cases then pending on direct review or not yet final, as well as [to the parties in the case in which the new rule is announced and to those cases tried after the effective date of the rule].” Geesa, 820 S.W.2d at 163 n. 13. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Collins v. State
green
1 sentence1996Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d at 793-94 ; Collins, 640 S.W.2d at 290-91 . 1 . "[A]pplying the new rule to all cases then pending on direct review or not yet final, as well as [to the parties in the case in which the new rule is announced and to those cases tried after the effective date of the rule].” Geesa, 820 S.W.2d at 163 n. 13. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Sproles Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Long
green
2 sentences1948Sproles Motor Freight Lines v. Long, 140 Texas 494 , 168 S. W. (2d) 642 ; Cloudt v. Hutcherson (Tex. Civ. 1948Sproles Motor Freight Lines v. Long, 140 Texas 494 , 168 S. W. (2d) 642 ; Cloudt v. Hutcherson (Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.