effective date rule (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

effective date rule in Indiana

11 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2000 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Bell v. Stategreen
ind · 1993 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
1 sentence

2000In Bell v. State, 610 N.E.2d 229, 233 (Ind.1998), a case tried prior to the effective date of the rule, tbe trial court granted the State’s request that two witnesses remain in the courtroom during the trial.

11
Smith v. Stategreen
indctapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992See Smith v. State (1991) 2d Dist.Ind.App., 580 N.E.2d 298, 302-03 , rehearing denied.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Austin v. State green
ind · 1984
2 sentences

1986The plea of guilty was given and accepted on December 7, 1981, after the effective date of the rule announced in German v. State (1981), Ind., 428 N.E.2d 234 , requiring strict compliance by the trial courts of the State with the provisions of the guilty plea statute then existing, which statutory provisions were declared required by the due process of law clauses in our constitutions in the case of Austin v. State (1984), Ind., 468 N.E.2d 1027 .

1986The plea of guilty was given and accepted on August 1, 1985, after the effective date of the rule announced in German v. State (1981), Ind., 428 N.E.2d 284 , requiring strict compliance by the trial courts of the State with the provisions of the guilty plea statute then existing, which statutory provisions were declared required by the due process of law clauses in our constitutions in the case of Austin v. State (1984), Ind., 468 N.E.2d 1027 .

71986–1986
White v. State green
ind · 1986
2 sentences

1986Both of these cases were recently overruled in White v. State (1986), Ind., 497 N.E.2d 893 .

1986Both of these cases were recently overruled in White v. State (1986), Ind., 497 N.E.2d 893 .

71986–1986
German v. State green
ind · 1981
2 sentences

1986The plea of guilty was given and accepted on December 7, 1981, after the effective date of the rule announced in German v. State (1981), Ind., 428 N.E.2d 234 , requiring strict compliance by the trial courts of the State with the provisions of the guilty plea statute then existing, which statutory provisions were declared required by the due process of law clauses in our constitutions in the case of Austin v. State (1984), Ind., 468 N.E.2d 1027 .

1986The plea of guilty was accepted on September 1, 1982, after the effective date of the rule announced in German v. State (1981), Ind., 428 N.E.2d 234 , requiring strict compliance by the trial courts of the State with the provisions of the guilty plea statute then existing, which statutory provisions were declared required by due process of law in the case of Austin v. State (1984), Ind., 468 N.E.2d. 237.

51986–1986
State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Ft. Wayne Sport Club, Inc. neutral
indctapp · 1969
2 sentences

1970Such procedure is countenanced and promoted by Rule AP. 15 (M) (6), Indiana Rules of Procedure, and prior to the effective date of such rule we took analogous action in State Bd. of Tax Com'rs. v. Fort Wayne Sport Club, Inc. (1969), 145 Ind. App. 1 , 248 N. E. 2d 372 , 18 Ind. Dec. 27 .

1970Such procedure is countenanced and promoted by Rule AP. 15 (M) (6), Indiana Rules of Procedure, and prior to the effective date of such rule we took analogous action in State Bd. of Tax Com'rs. v. Fort Wayne Sport Club, Inc. (1969), 145 Ind. App. 1 , 248 N. E. 2d 372 , 18 Ind. Dec. 27 .

11970–1970

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IN § Ind. Code § 35-35-1-2 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

FL 50 (1974–2025) PA 28 (1955–2023) CO 14 (1988–2024) MD 14 (1967–2020) TX 14 (1948–2025) NY 12 (1953–2008) IN 11 (1970–2000) MO 8 (1967–2001) CA 7 (1968–2007) ID 6 (1983–1991) NJ 5 (1973–2026) MI 5 (1958–2016) MA 5 (1964–2016) ND 5 (1998–2018) NM 4 (1967–2019) UT 4 (2021–2026) TN 4 (1997–2016) LA 3 (1984–2007) GA 3 (1989–1995) IA 3 (1975–2006) OH 2 (1994–2004) VT 2 (2015–2022) MN 2 (1975–2017) WA 2 (1994–2019) KY 2 (1964–1970)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check