Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Leo Tom Hopkinsgreen2 sentences2016See United States v. Hopkins, 433 F.2d 1041, 1045 (5th Cir. 1970) (no evidence Dallas police, either prior to or following federal interrogation, acted so as to dilute efficacy of warning given by federal agent). –26– Dominy-Gatz further argues that her statements made after the break in the recording should be suppressed because, by not assuring she remained at all times within range of the recording device, Larouche did not competently operate the recording device in compliance with section 3(a)(3) of article 38.22. 2008See Ex parte Bagley, 509 S.W.2d at 336-37 ; Jones, 119 S.W.3d at 774 n. 13, 794-801 (Keller, P.J., concurring); Miller, 196 S.W.3d at 266-67 ; see also Hopkins, 433 F.2d at 1045 . | 5 | 5 |
Martinez v. Stategreen2 sentences2014In his concurrence, Judge Price stated, “I do not know whether [the State’s] burden should extend to disproving circumstances that precede the Miranda warnings that might suffice, in contemplation of Seibert , to call the efficacy of those warnings into doubt.” Id. at 628 (Price, J., concurring). 2013In his concurrence, Judge Price stated, “I do not know whether [the State’s] burden should extend to disproving circumstances that precede the Miranda warm-ings that might suffice, in contemplation of Seibert , to call the efficacy of those warnings into doubt.” Id. at 628 (Price, J., concurring). | 2 | 2 |
Ex Parte Bagleygreen2 sentences2008See Ex parte Bagley, 509 S.W.2d at 336-37 ; Jones, 119 S.W.3d at 774 n. 13, 794-801 (Keller, P.J., concurring); Miller, 196 S.W.3d at 266-67 ; see also Hopkins, 433 F.2d at 1045 . 2008See Ex parte Bagley, 509 S.W.2d at 336-37 ; Jones, 119 S.W.3d at 774 n. 13, 794-801 (Keller, P.J., concurring); Miller, 196 S.W.3d at 266-67 ; see also Hopkins, 433 F.2d at 1045 . | 2 | 2 |
Scudder & German v. Pearlsteingreen2 sentences2004See United States v. Hopkins , 433 F.2d 1041, 1045 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied , 401 U.S. 1013 (1971). 2004See United States v. Hopkins , 433 F.2d 1041, 1045 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied , 401 U.S. 1013 (1971). | 2 | 2 |
Hackett v. Stategreen1 sentence2024Hackett v. State, 160 S.W.3d 588, 592 (Tex. App.—Waco 2005, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1 |
Ocon v. Stategreen1 sentence2021See Ocon, 284 S.W.3d at 884 . | 1 | 1 |
Simpson v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Simpson v. State, 119 S.W.3d 262, 272 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Gardner v. Stategreen1 sentence2013Gardner v. State, 730 S.W.2d 675, 696 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), is inapt in this case as it deals with the presumptions in regard to the efficacy of an instruction by the trial court to disregard objectionable testimony. | 1 | 1 |
Hawkins v. Stategreen1 sentence2007Hawkins v. State, 135 S.W.3d 72, 76-77 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Bell v. Presbyterian Churchgreen1 sentence2000The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the courts from determining employment decisions concerning “ministers.” See Starkman, 198 F.3d at 175-77 ; Bell, 126 F.3d at 331; Catholic Univ. of Am., 83 F.3d at 465 ; McClure, 460 F.2d at 560 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences2008See Ex parte Bagley, 509 S.W.2d at 336-37 ; Jones, 119 S.W.3d at 774 n. 13, 794-801 (Keller, P.J., concurring); Miller, 196 S.W.3d at 266-67 ; see also Hopkins, 433 F.2d at 1045 . 2008See Ex parte Bagley, 509 S.W.2d at 336-37 ; Jones, 119 S.W.3d at 774 n. 13, 794-801 (Keller, P.J., concurring); Miller, 196 S.W.3d at 266-67 ; see also Hopkins, 433 F.2d at 1045 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Miller v. State
green
2 sentences2008See Ex parte Bagley, 509 S.W.2d at 336-37 ; Jones, 119 S.W.3d at 774 n. 13, 794-801 (Keller, P.J., concurring); Miller, 196 S.W.3d at 266-67 ; see also Hopkins, 433 F.2d at 1045 . 2008See Ex parte Bagley, 509 S.W.2d at 336-37 ; Jones, 119 S.W.3d at 774 n. 13, 794-801 (Keller, P.J., concurring); Miller, 196 S.W.3d at 266-67 ; see also Hopkins, 433 F.2d at 1045 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
cluster 19566
green
1 sentence2000The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the courts from determining employment decisions concerning “ministers.” See Starkman, 198 F.3d at 175-77 ; Bell, 126 F.3d at 331; Catholic Univ. of Am., 83 F.3d at 465 ; McClure, 460 F.2d at 560 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Elizabeth McDonough v. The Catholic University of America
green
1 sentence2000The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the courts from determining employment decisions concerning “ministers.” See Starkman, 198 F.3d at 175-77 ; Bell, 126 F.3d at 331; Catholic Univ. of Am., 83 F.3d at 465 ; McClure, 460 F.2d at 560 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Mrs. Billie B. McCLURE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the SALVATION ARMY, Defendant-Appellee
green
1 sentence2000The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the courts from determining employment decisions concerning “ministers.” See Starkman, 198 F.3d at 175-77 ; Bell, 126 F.3d at 331; Catholic Univ. of Am., 83 F.3d at 465 ; McClure, 460 F.2d at 560 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
McKanna v. Edgar
green
1 sentence1977Although we doubt the efficacy of this rule today in light of supreme court authority that no presumptions are indulged in favor of a default judgment, McKanna v. Edgar, 388 S.W.2d 927 (Tex.1965), the cases of Robinson and Hopkins, supra have not been limited or overruled by the supreme court. 1 The facts here are distinguishable from the facts in those cases because the record affirmatively shows that the trial court was aware of the answers on file. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.