instance error (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

instance error in Florida

13 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1932–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
South Carolina Ins. Co. v. Kokaygreen
fla · 1981 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1982–1983
2 sentences

1983See South Carolina Insurance Company v. Kokay, 398 So.2d 1355 (Fla.1981).

1982See South Carolina Insurance Company v. Kokay, 398 So.2d 1355 (Fla.1981); Stephan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty, 384 So.2d 691 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); cf., Cox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 378 So.2d 330, 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (stacking allowed where policies issued to entirely different named insureds).

22
Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Cooperstockgreen
fladistctapp · 1985 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
1 sentence

1988See Nationwide Insurance Company v. Cooperstock, 472 So.2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Vigilant Insurance Company v. Kelps, 372 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); and *800 Cruger v. Allstate Insurance Company, 162 So.2d 690 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

11
Herman v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 1981 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
1 sentence

1985United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 , 96 S.Ct. 2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); see also Herman v. State, 396 So.2d 222 (Fla.4th DCA 1981); Gosman v. State, 383 So.2d 1178 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

11
Cox v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.green
fladistctapp · 1980 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
1 sentence

1982See South Carolina Insurance Company v. Kokay, 398 So.2d 1355 (Fla.1981); Stephan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty, 384 So.2d 691 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); cf., Cox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 378 So.2d 330, 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (stacking allowed where policies issued to entirely different named insureds).

11
Cortes v. Stategreen
fla · 1938 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966See Cortes v. State, 135 Fla. 589 , 185 So. 323 (1938), and Ingram v. Prescott, 111 Fla. 320 , 149 So. 369 (1933).

1966See Cortes v. State, 135 Fla. 589 , 185 So. 323 (1938), and Ingram v. Prescott, 111 Fla. 320 , 149 So. 369 (1933).

11
Ingram v. Prescottgreen
fla · 1933 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966See Cortes v. State, 135 Fla. 589 , 185 So. 323 (1938), and Ingram v. Prescott, 111 Fla. 320 , 149 So. 369 (1933).

1966See Cortes v. State, 135 Fla. 589 , 185 So. 323 (1938), and Ingram v. Prescott, 111 Fla. 320 , 149 So. 369 (1933).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

CaseCitedYears
Pathway Financial v. MIAMI INTERN. REALTY green
fladistctapp · 1991
1 sentence

2011Having elected in this instance to claim lost profits, 11 Net Results can recover only those prospective profits “which would have been possible only if the contract would have been, fully performed by the [non-breaching party].” Id.

12011–2011
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sierra green
fladistctapp · 1998
1 sentence

1999Co. v. Sierra, 705 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Perez v. Allstate Ins.

11999–1999
Cruger v. Allstate Insurance Company green
fladistctapp · 1964
1 sentence

1988See Nationwide Insurance Company v. Cooperstock, 472 So.2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Vigilant Insurance Company v. Kelps, 372 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); and *800 Cruger v. Allstate Insurance Company, 162 So.2d 690 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

11988–1988
Vigilant Ins. Co. v. Kelps green
fladistctapp · 1979
1 sentence

1988See Nationwide Insurance Company v. Cooperstock, 472 So.2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Vigilant Insurance Company v. Kelps, 372 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); and *800 Cruger v. Allstate Insurance Company, 162 So.2d 690 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

11988–1988
United States v. Agurs green
scotus · 1976
2 sentences

1985United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 , 96 S.Ct. 2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); see also Herman v. State, 396 So.2d 222 (Fla.4th DCA 1981); Gosman v. State, 383 So.2d 1178 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

1985United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 , 96 S.Ct. 2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); see also Herman v. State, 396 So.2d 222 (Fla.4th DCA 1981); Gosman v. State, 383 So.2d 1178 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

11985–1985
Gosman v. State neutral
fladistctapp · 1980
1 sentence

1985United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 , 96 S.Ct. 2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); see also Herman v. State, 396 So.2d 222 (Fla.4th DCA 1981); Gosman v. State, 383 So.2d 1178 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

11985–1985
Jackson v. Hatch green
fladistctapp · 1974
1 sentence

1984Jackson v. Hatch, 288 So.2d 564 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1974) (interpreting Section 713.29); Kittel v. Kittel, 210 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1967).

11984–1984
Kittel v. Kittel green
fla · 1968
1 sentence

1984Jackson v. Hatch, 288 So.2d 564 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1974) (interpreting Section 713.29); Kittel v. Kittel, 210 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1967).

11984–1984
Lowry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance neutral
fladistctapp · 1982
1 sentence

1984The court concluded that “to permit stacking in this instance would be in violation of Section 627.4132, Florida Statutes (1977), which prevents stacking separate policies involving the same named insured.” 421 So.2d at 669 .

11984–1984
Stephan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty neutral
fladistctapp · 1980
1 sentence

1982See South Carolina Insurance Company v. Kokay, 398 So.2d 1355 (Fla.1981); Stephan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty, 384 So.2d 691 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); cf., Cox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 378 So.2d 330, 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (stacking allowed where policies issued to entirely different named insureds).

11982–1982
The Florida Bar v. Rubin green
fla · 1978
1 sentence

1979Florida Bar v. Rubin, 362 So.2d 12 (Fla.1978).

11979–1979
Santiemmo v. Days Transfer, Inc. green
illappct · 1956
1 sentence

1976Penny v. Thurman, 34 Ohio App.2d 190 , 63 Ohio Ops.2d 319, 297 N.E.2d 555 (1972); Satiemmo v. Days Transfer, Inc., 9 Ill.

11976–1976
Penny v. Thurman green
ohioctapp · 1972
2 sentences

1976Penny v. Thurman, 34 Ohio App.2d 190 , 63 Ohio Ops.2d 319, 297 N.E.2d 555 (1972); Satiemmo v. Days Transfer, Inc., 9 Ill.

1976Penny v. Thurman, 34 Ohio App.2d 190 , 63 Ohio Ops.2d 319, 297 N.E.2d 555 (1972); Satiemmo v. Days Transfer, Inc., 9 Ill.

11976–1976
Florida Greyhound Lines v. Jones green
fla · 1952
1 sentence

1967Purvis, out of the courtroom and found him to be argumentative, somewhat irrational and of such mental attitude and physical appearance that the jury might be influenced." In Florida Greyhound Lines v. Jones, Fla. 1952, 60 So.2d 396 , the Supreme Court of Florida was faced with the propriety of a proceeding where the trial court permitted the appearance of the plaintiff "* * * before the jury, when she was on a stretcher and, apparently, in a weak, sickened and stupified condition and attended by a nurse and a hospital attendant." There the Court said: "* * * One who institutes an action is en

11967–1967
Muller v. Ocala Foundry & Machine Works green
· 1905
1 sentence

1932Muller v. Ocala Foundry Machine Works, 49 Fla. 189 , 38 So.2d 64 ; Globe Theatre Co. v. Watt, 62 Fla. 196 , 57 So.2d 201 .

11932–1932
Globe Theatre & Amusement Co. v. Watt neutral
fla · 1911
1 sentence

1932Muller v. Ocala Foundry Machine Works, 49 Fla. 189 , 38 So.2d 64 ; Globe Theatre Co. v. Watt, 62 Fla. 196 , 57 So.2d 201 .

11932–1932

Statutes the citing opinions construe

FL § 627.4132 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 36 (1901–2024) TX 31 (1903–2025) MI 19 (1936–2024) IL 18 (1897–2016) CA 16 (1895–2021) PA 14 (1914–2026) GA 14 (1900–2023) FL 13 (1932–2011) WA 10 (1920–2025) WY 8 (1978–2024) MA 8 (1955–2013) NJ 6 (1891–2001) MO 6 (1909–2007) OH 6 (1995–2013) NC 6 (1896–2020) CT 6 (1926–2015) MS 6 (2000–2017) MD 5 (1977–2025) NM 5 (1929–2005) WV 4 (1981–2005) CO 3 (1981–2015) KY 3 (1937–2016) AL 3 (1970–1989) ME 3 (1981–2017) MN 2 (1878–1955) KS 2 (1944–2000) LA 2 (1914–1984) RI 2 (1979–2015) IA 2 (1921–1975) NE 2 (1923–2001) MT 2 (1917–1943) AZ 2 (1923–1974) OR 2 (1918–2020) WI 2 (1933–2014) VA 2 (1950–1995) IN 2 (1887–2020) DC 2 (2008–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check