13 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1974–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Benitez v. KFC National Management Co.green1 sentence2005This court recognized the tort in Benitez v. KFC National Management Co., 305 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Cloninger v. National General Insurancegreen1 sentence2001The majority correctly holds that in order to satisfy the requirements of section 143a — 2 of the Insurance Code (now codified as 215 ILCS 5/143a — 2 (West 2000)), National Union’s offer of uninsured motorist coverage had to meet the four-pronged test of Cloninger v. National General Insurance Co., 109 Ill. 2d 419, 425-26 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Estate of Hoover
green
2 sentences2006Hoover, 155 Ill. 2d at 416 . 2006Hoover, 155 Ill. 2d at 416 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Fisher v. Lexington Health Care, Inc.
green
2 sentences2001Applying the four-pronged test set forth in Fisher, 188 Ill.2d at 460 , 243 Ill.Dec. 46 , 722 N.E.2d 1115 , the parallels between the two acts become clear. 2001Applying the four-pronged test set forth in Fisher, 188 Ill.2d at 460 , 243 Ill.Dec. 46 , 722 N.E.2d 1115 , the parallels between the two acts become clear. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.
green
2 sentences2001The purpose of the Workers' Compensation Act is to provide "efficient remedies for and protection of employees and, as such, [the Workers' Compensation Act] promotes the general welfare of th[e] State." Kelsay, 74 Ill.2d at 181 , 23 Ill. 2001The purpose of the Workers' Compensation Act is to provide "efficient remedies for and protection of employees and, as such, [the Workers' Compensation Act] promotes the general welfare of th[e] State." Kelsay, 74 Ill.2d at 181 , 23 Ill. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Margolis v. Director of Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences1997Margolis, 180 Ill. 1997Margolis, 180 Ill. | 2 | 1997–1997 |
Dobkowski v. Lowe's, Inc.
green
1 sentence1989The four elements are: “(1) the testimony or opinion must be necessary, (2) the jury must be assisted by testimony regarding knowledge of physics or the sciences beyond its ordinary ken, (3) the proffered witness must be sufficiently possessed of the requisite qualifications as an expert and (4) there must be sufficient physical data upon which the expert may base his conclusions and opinions.” Dobkowski, 20 Ill. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Niemann v. Vermilion County Housing Authority
green
1 sentence1987App. 3d 735 , 428 N.E.2d 706 , in which we applied a four-pronged test: (1) the owner knows young children frequent the area; (2) there is a dangerous or defective condition present on the land; (3) the condition or agency is likely to cause injury because of a child’s immaturity or inability to appreciate the risk; and (4) the expense of remedying the condition or guarding against injury is slight compared to the risk of harm to children. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Lynn v. Village of West City
green
1 sentence1978App. 3d 561, 565 , 345 N.E.2d 172, 175 , a four-pronged test has been developed to assist in determining exactly what interest a broker is representing: (1) Who set him in motion first? (2) Who could control his actions? (3) Who pays him? (4) Whose interest was he to protect? | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences1978(Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1 , 20 L. 1978(Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1 , 20 L. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Dauksch v. Chamness
green
2 sentences1974In Dauksch v. Chamness, 11 Ill.App.3d 346 , 296 N.E.2d 592 , we stated a four-pronged test to determine the admissibility of expert accident reconstruction testimony. 1974In Dauksch v. Chamness, 11 Ill.App.3d 346 , 296 N.E.2d 592 , we stated a four-pronged test to determine the admissibility of expert accident reconstruction testimony. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.