Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Christensen
green
2 sentences2016State v. Christensen, 153 Wn.2d 186, 192 , 102 P.3d 789 (2004). 2014App. 59, 64 , 279 P.3d 461 (citing State v. Christensen, 153 Wn.2d 186, 192 , 102 P.3d 789 (2004)), review granted, 175 Wn.2d 1022 (2012). | 4 | 2012–2016 |
State v. Christensen
green
2 sentences2016State v. Christensen, 153 Wn.2d 186, 192 , 102 P.3d 789 (2004). 2014App. 59, 64 , 279 P.3d 461 (citing State v. Christensen, 153 Wn.2d 186, 192 , 102 P.3d 789 (2004)), review granted, 175 Wn.2d 1022 (2012). | 4 | 2012–2016 |
City v. NORTHSHORE UNITED CHURCH
green
2 sentences2021Generally, “we have applied the same four-pronged analysis in an article I, section 11 challenge: where a party has (1) a sincere religious belief and (2) the exercise of that belief is substantially burdened by the challenged law, the law is enforceable against that party only if it (3) serves a compelling government interest and (4) is the least restrictive means of achieving that interest.” Id. (citing City of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of Christ, 166 Wn.2d 633, 642 , 211 P.3d 406 (2009)). 2019City of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of Christ , 166 Wash.2d 633 , 642, 211 P.3d 406 (2009) ; Backlund , 106 Wash.2d at 641 , 724 P.2d 981 . | 3 | 2017–2021 |
City of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of Christ
green
2 sentences2021Generally, “we have applied the same four-pronged analysis in an article I, section 11 challenge: where a party has (1) a sincere religious belief and (2) the exercise of that belief is substantially burdened by the challenged law, the law is enforceable against that party only if it (3) serves a compelling government interest and (4) is the least restrictive means of achieving that interest.” Id. (citing City of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of Christ, 166 Wn.2d 633, 642 , 211 P.3d 406 (2009)). 2019City of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of Christ , 166 Wash.2d 633 , 642, 211 P.3d 406 (2009) ; Backlund , 106 Wash.2d at 641 , 724 P.2d 981 . | 3 | 2017–2021 |
Backlund v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF KING CTY. HOSP. DIST. NO. 2
green
2 sentences2019City of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of Christ , 166 Wash.2d 633 , 642, 211 P.3d 406 (2009) ; Backlund , 106 Wash.2d at 641 , 724 P.2d 981 . 2019City of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of Christ , 166 Wash.2d 633 , 642, 211 P.3d 406 (2009) ; Backlund , 106 Wash.2d at 641 , 724 P.2d 981 . | 2 | 2017–2019 |
State v. Valencia
green
2 sentences2015No. 72338-3-1 / 5 possessing "paraphernalia" was ripe under a four pronged test. 169 Wn.2d 782, 786-91 , 239 P.3d 1059 (2010). 2015State v. Sanchez Valencia, 169 Wn.2d 782, 790 , 239 P.3d 1059 (2010). ¶10 In Sanchez Valencia, the court held that a preenforcement challenge to a community custody condition prohibiting the defendant from possessing “paraphernalia” was ripe under a four pronged test. 169 Wn.2d at 786-91 . | 2 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Valencia
green
2 sentences2015No. 72338-3-1 / 5 possessing "paraphernalia" was ripe under a four pronged test. 169 Wn.2d 782, 786-91 , 239 P.3d 1059 (2010). 2015State v. Sanchez Valencia, 169 Wn.2d 782, 790 , 239 P.3d 1059 (2010). ¶10 In Sanchez Valencia, the court held that a preenforcement challenge to a community custody condition prohibiting the defendant from possessing “paraphernalia” was ripe under a four pronged test. 169 Wn.2d at 786-91 . | 2 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Roden
green
2 sentences2014“We engage in a four-pronged analysis to determine whether an individual has violated the Act.” State v. Roden, 169 Wn. 2014"We engage in a four-pronged analysis to determine whether an individual has violated the Act." State v. Roden. 169 Wn. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Clark v. Baines
green
2 sentences2004Clark, 150 Wn.2d at 913 . 2004Clark, 150 Wash.2d at 913 , 84 P.3d 245 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Fisher
green
1 sentence2026Id. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Little v. King
green
1 sentence2024Little, 160 Wn.2d at 703-04 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
First Covenant Church of Seattle v. City of Seattle
green
1 sentence2021Generally, “we have applied the same four-pronged analysis in an article I, section 11 challenge: where a party has (1) a sincere religious belief and (2) the exercise of that belief is substantially burdened by the challenged law, the law is enforceable against that party only if it (3) serves a compelling government interest and (4) is the least restrictive means of achieving that interest.” Id. (citing City of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of Christ, 166 Wn.2d 633, 642 , 211 P.3d 406 (2009)). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Clark v. Baines
green
1 sentence2004Clark, 150 Wash.2d at 913 , 84 P.3d 245 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.