13 Maryland opinions name it 3 courts 1937–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Dackman Co.green2 sentences2017After striking down the Act’s immunity provisions, the Court declined to invalidate the Act as a whole, concluding that the “dominant purpose of the Act can be given effect without the invalid immunity provisions.” Dackman, 422 Md. at 384 (internal quotation marks omitted). 2017After striking down the Act’s immunity provisions, the Court declined to invalidate the Act as a whole, concluding that the “dominant purpose of the Act can be given effect without the invalid immunity provisions.” Dackman, 422 Md. at 384 (internal quotation marks omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Michael Robert Pulido v. Chris Chrones, Warden, Michael Robert Pulido v. Chris Chrones, Wardengreen2 sentences2009Pulido v. Chrones, 487 F.3d 669, 676 (9th Cir.2007). 2009Pulido v. Chrones, 487 F.3d 669, 676 (9th Cir.2007). | 1 | 1 |
Turner v. Stategreen2 sentences1995In Turner v. State, 299 Md. 565, 576-577 , 474 A.2d 1297, 1302-1303 (1984), this Court reviewed the principles of sever-ability applicable to a prohibitory statute with an invalid exception: “The primary focus in questions of severability is legislative intent. 1995In Turner v. State, 299 Md. 565, 576-577 , 474 A.2d 1297, 1302-1303 (1984), this Court reviewed the principles of sever-ability applicable to a prohibitory statute with an invalid exception: “The primary focus in questions of severability is legislative intent. | 1 | 1 |
Davidson v. Millergreen2 sentences1987In the earlier case of Davidson v. Miller, 276 Md. 54, 83 , 344 A.2d 422, 439 (1975), the Court stated the principle in more imperative terms: Likewise we mention that even though constitutional and unconstitutional provisions of a law are contained in the same section, the entire section or enactment is not invalid unless the provisions are essentially and inseparably connected in substance____ It thus becomes the duty of the court whenever possible to separate the valid from the invalid provisions____ Cities Service v. Governor, 290 Md. 553 , 431 A.2d 663 (1981), tempers this declaration by 1987In the earlier case of Davidson v. Miller, 276 Md. 54, 83 , 344 A.2d 422, 439 (1975), the Court stated the principle in more imperative terms: Likewise we mention that even though constitutional and unconstitutional provisions of a law are contained in the same section, the entire section or enactment is not invalid unless the provisions are essentially and inseparably connected in substance____ It thus becomes the duty of the court whenever possible to separate the valid from the invalid provisions____ Cities Service v. Governor, 290 Md. 553 , 431 A.2d 663 (1981), tempers this declaration by | 1 | 1 |
J. Bernstein & Sons v. Hobelmangreen2 sentences1937Supra; Bernstein & Sons v. Hobelman, Trustee, 70 Md. 29, 37, 38 , 16 A. 374 . 1937Supra; Bernstein & Sons v. Hobelman, Trustee, 70 Md. 29, 37, 38 , 16 A. 374 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Schuller
green
2 sentences1985A long established principle of statutory construction in determining severability questions, is that where the Legislature enacts a prohibition with an excepted class, and a court finds that the classification is constitutionally infirm, the court will ordinarily not presume that the Legislature would have enacted the prohibition without the exception, thereby extending the prohibition to a class of persons whom the Legislature clearly intended should not be reached. [ Id. at 319 , 372 A.2d at 1083 .] See Turner v. State, supra ; Wheeler v. State, 281 Md. 593 , 380 A.2d 1052 (1977). 1985A long established principle of statutory construction in determining severability questions, is that where the Legislature enacts a prohibition with an. excepted class, and a court finds that the classification is constitutionally infirm, the court will ordinarily not presume that the Legislature would have enacted the prohibition without the exception, thereby extending the prohibition to a class of persons whom the Legislature clearly intended should not be reached. [Id. at 319, 372 A.2d at 1083 .] See Turner v. State, supra; Wheeler v. State, 281 Md. 593 , 380 A.2d 1052 (1977). | 3 | 1977–1985 |
Nutwell v. County Commissioners
green
2 sentences1981State v. Schuller, 280 Md. 305 , 372 A.2d 1076 (1977); Curtis v. Mactier, 115 Md. 386 , 80 A. 1066 (1911); Nutwell v. Anne Arundel County, 110 Md. 667 , 73 A. 710 (1909); Storck v. Baltimore City, 101 Md. 476 , 61 A. 330 (1905). 1981State v. Schuller, 280 Md. 305 , 372 A.2d 1076 (1977); Curtis v. Mactier, 115 Md. 386 , 80 A. 1066 (1911); Nutwell v. Anne Arundel County, 110 Md. 667 , 73 A. 710 (1909); Storck v. Baltimore City, 101 Md. 476 , 61 A. 330 (1905). | 2 | 1977–1981 |
Curtis v. MacTier
green
2 sentences1981State v. Schuller, 280 Md. 305 , 372 A.2d 1076 (1977); Curtis v. Mactier, 115 Md. 386 , 80 A. 1066 (1911); Nutwell v. Anne Arundel County, 110 Md. 667 , 73 A. 710 (1909); Storck v. Baltimore City, 101 Md. 476 , 61 A. 330 (1905). 1981State v. Schuller, 280 Md. 305 , 372 A.2d 1076 (1977); Curtis v. Mactier, 115 Md. 386 , 80 A. 1066 (1911); Nutwell v. Anne Arundel County, 110 Md. 667 , 73 A. 710 (1909); Storck v. Baltimore City, 101 Md. 476 , 61 A. 330 (1905). | 2 | 1977–1981 |
Storck v. Mayor of Baltimore
green
2 sentences1981State v. Schuller, 280 Md. 305 , 372 A.2d 1076 (1977); Curtis v. Mactier, 115 Md. 386 , 80 A. 1066 (1911); Nutwell v. Anne Arundel County, 110 Md. 667 , 73 A. 710 (1909); Storck v. Baltimore City, 101 Md. 476 , 61 A. 330 (1905). 1981State v. Schuller, 280 Md. 305 , 372 A.2d 1076 (1977); Curtis v. Mactier, 115 Md. 386 , 80 A. 1066 (1911); Nutwell v. Anne Arundel County, 110 Md. 667 , 73 A. 710 (1909); Storck v. Baltimore City, 101 Md. 476 , 61 A. 330 (1905). | 2 | 1977–1981 |
Cities Service Co. v. Governor
green
2 sentences1987In the earlier case of Davidson v. Miller, 276 Md. 54, 83 , 344 A.2d 422, 439 (1975), the Court stated the principle in more imperative terms: Likewise we mention that even though constitutional and unconstitutional provisions of a law are contained in the same section, the entire section or enactment is not invalid unless the provisions are essentially and inseparably connected in substance____ It thus becomes the duty of the court whenever possible to separate the valid from the invalid provisions____ Cities Service v. Governor, 290 Md. 553 , 431 A.2d 663 (1981), tempers this declaration by 1987In the earlier case of Davidson v. Miller, 276 Md. 54, 83 , 344 A.2d 422, 439 (1975), the Court stated the principle in more imperative terms: Likewise we mention that even though constitutional and unconstitutional provisions of a law are contained in the same section, the entire section or enactment is not invalid unless the provisions are essentially and inseparably connected in substance____ It thus becomes the duty of the court whenever possible to separate the valid from the invalid provisions____ Cities Service v. Governor, 290 Md. 553 , 431 A.2d 663 (1981), tempers this declaration by | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Sturman v. Ingraham
green
2 sentences1986Perini relies upon a statement in the decision that the proposed SHP provided "... important and relevant information when analyzing need according to CÓMAR 10.24.01.07D(2)(c)(1983).” Perini also cites to the Commission’s admission that the proposed plan “... can and reasonably should, be used when determining the need for the project____” Perini suggests that although the Commission termed the use of the policies as “important and relevant information,” implying that the *211 proposed SHP was not used as a regulation per se, “[i]t is the effect of the use of the Proposed SHP, not the label pl 1986Perini relies upon a statement in the decision that the proposed SHP provided "... important and relevant information when analyzing need according to CÓMAR 10.24.01.07D(2)(c)(1983).” Perini also cites to the Commission’s admission that the proposed plan “... can and reasonably should, be used when determining the need for the project____” Perini suggests that although the Commission termed the use of the policies as “important and relevant information,” implying that the *211 proposed SHP was not used as a regulation per se, “[i]t is the effect of the use of the Proposed SHP, not the label pl | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Cheshire Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health Care
neutral
1 sentence1986Perini relies upon a statement in the decision that the proposed SHP provided "... important and relevant information when analyzing need according to CÓMAR 10.24.01.07D(2)(c)(1983).” Perini also cites to the Commission’s admission that the proposed plan “... can and reasonably should, be used when determining the need for the project____” Perini suggests that although the Commission termed the use of the policies as “important and relevant information,” implying that the *211 proposed SHP was not used as a regulation per se, “[i]t is the effect of the use of the Proposed SHP, not the label pl | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Salmon Brook Convalescent Home, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health Care
green
2 sentences1986Perini relies upon a statement in the decision that the proposed SHP provided "... important and relevant information when analyzing need according to CÓMAR 10.24.01.07D(2)(c)(1983).” Perini also cites to the Commission’s admission that the proposed plan “... can and reasonably should, be used when determining the need for the project____” Perini suggests that although the Commission termed the use of the policies as “important and relevant information,” implying that the *211 proposed SHP was not used as a regulation per se, “[i]t is the effect of the use of the Proposed SHP, not the label pl 1986Perini relies upon a statement in the decision that the proposed SHP provided "... important and relevant information when analyzing need according to CÓMAR 10.24.01.07D(2)(c)(1983).” Perini also cites to the Commission’s admission that the proposed plan “... can and reasonably should, be used when determining the need for the project____” Perini suggests that although the Commission termed the use of the policies as “important and relevant information,” implying that the *211 proposed SHP was not used as a regulation per se, “[i]t is the effect of the use of the Proposed SHP, not the label pl | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Cheshire Convalescent Center v. Comm. on Hospitals
green
1 sentence1986Perini relies upon a statement in the decision that the proposed SHP provided "... important and relevant information when analyzing need according to CÓMAR 10.24.01.07D(2)(c)(1983).” Perini also cites to the Commission’s admission that the proposed plan “... can and reasonably should, be used when determining the need for the project____” Perini suggests that although the Commission termed the use of the policies as “important and relevant information,” implying that the *211 proposed SHP was not used as a regulation per se, “[i]t is the effect of the use of the Proposed SHP, not the label pl | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Wheeler v. State
green
2 sentences1985A long established principle of statutory construction in determining severability questions, is that where the Legislature enacts a prohibition with an. excepted class, and a court finds that the classification is constitutionally infirm, the court will ordinarily not presume that the Legislature would have enacted the prohibition without the exception, thereby extending the prohibition to a class of persons whom the Legislature clearly intended should not be reached. [Id. at 319, 372 A.2d at 1083 .] See Turner v. State, supra; Wheeler v. State, 281 Md. 593 , 380 A.2d 1052 (1977). 1985A long established principle of statutory construction in determining severability questions, is that where the Legislature enacts a prohibition with an. excepted class, and a court finds that the classification is constitutionally infirm, the court will ordinarily not presume that the Legislature would have enacted the prohibition without the exception, thereby extending the prohibition to a class of persons whom the Legislature clearly intended should not be reached. [Id. at 319, 372 A.2d at 1083 .] See Turner v. State, supra; Wheeler v. State, 281 Md. 593 , 380 A.2d 1052 (1977). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Aye v. State
green
1 sentence1974We said in Aye , at 39: “If the criminal court to which jurisdiction over a child had been waived by a juvenile court determines the order of waiver to be invalid on its face, it should refer the matter back to the juvenile court for the issuance of a proper order before trying the case.” We observed, id., at 40 , that “. . . an indictment returned or information issued on the basis of an invalid waiver is void and the accused may not be legally tried thereunder in a criminal court.” The waiver order is subject to appellate review upon an appeal by the accused from a judgment entered upon his | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Snyder v. Cearfoss
green
2 sentences1948Snyder v. Cearfoss, 187 Md. 635 , 51 A. 2d 264 . 1948Snyder v. Cearfoss, 187 Md. 635 , 51 A. 2d 264 . | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Tawes, Comptroller v. Williams
green
2 sentences1946The case at bar is not in the same classification as those of Tawes, Comptroller v. Williams, 179 Md. 224 , 17 A. 2d 137 , 132 A. L. 1946The case at bar is not in the same classification as those of Tawes, Comptroller v. Williams, 179 Md. 224 , 17 A. 2d 137 , 132 A. L. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Mayor of Baltimore v. Radecke
green
1 sentence1946It was said by Judge Miller in the case of Mayor, etc., of Baltimore v. Radecke, 49 Md. 217 , at page 231, 33 Am. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.