Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1852–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Edwards v. Arizonagreen2 sentences1998See Edwards, 451 U.S. at 484-87 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 (holding that although officers advised him of his rights immediately prior to the interrogation, Edwards’s waiver of his previously invoked right was invalid); Roberson, 486 U.S. at 678-82 , 108 S.Ct. 2093 (finding an invalid waiver where the accused, who had invoked his right to counsel, made incriminating statements when he was later approached by another officer and fully advised of his rights). 1998See Edwards, 451 U.S. at 484-87 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 (holding that although officers advised him of his rights immediately prior to the interrogation, Edwards’s waiver of his previously invoked right was invalid); Roberson, 486 U.S. at 678-82 , 108 S.Ct. 2093 (finding an invalid waiver where the accused, who had invoked his right to counsel, made incriminating statements when he was later approached by another officer and fully advised of his rights). | 1 | 1 |
Sharp v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1978Sharp v. Commonwealth, 213 Va. 269, 272 , 192 S.E.2d 217, 219 (1972). 1978Sharp v. Commonwealth, 213 Va. 269, 272 , 192 S.E.2d 217, 219 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bull v. Read
neutral
2 sentences1883Bull v. Read, 13 Gratt. 78 ; Eyre v. Jacob, sheriff, 14 Gratt. 423 ; Redd v. Supervisors, &c., 31 Gratt. 697 -8; Cooley on Taxation, 546, note 1. 1852Blanton v. Southern, etc., Co., 77 Va. 335 ; Goddin v. Crump, 8 Leigh 120 ; Bull v. Read, 13 Gratt. 78 ; Eyre v. Jacob, 14 Gratt. 423 ; Redd v. Supervisors, 31 Gratt. 697 . | 4 | 1852–1883 |
Blanton v. Southern Fertilizing Co.
green
2 sentences1852Blanton v. Southern, etc., Co., 77 Va. 335 ; Goddin v. Crump, 8 Leigh 120 ; Bull v. Read, 13 Gratt. 78 ; Eyre v. Jacob, 14 Gratt. 423 ; Redd v. Supervisors, 31 Gratt. 697 . 1852Blanton v. Southern, etc., Co., 77 Va. 335 ; Goddin v. Crump, 8 Leigh 120 ; Bull v. Read, 13 Gratt. 78 ; Eyre v. Jacob, 14 Gratt. 423 ; Redd v. Supervisors, 31 Gratt. 697 . | 3 | 1852–1852 |
Arizona v. Roberson
green
2 sentences1998See Edwards, 451 U.S. at 484-87 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 (holding that although officers advised him of his rights immediately prior to the interrogation, Edwards’s waiver of his previously invoked right was invalid); Roberson, 486 U.S. at 678-82 , 108 S.Ct. 2093 (finding an invalid waiver where the accused, who had invoked his right to counsel, made incriminating statements when he was later approached by another officer and fully advised of his rights). 1998See Edwards, 451 U.S. at 484-87 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 (holding that although officers advised him of his rights immediately prior to the interrogation, Edwards’s waiver of his previously invoked right was invalid); Roberson, 486 U.S. at 678-82 , 108 S.Ct. 2093 (finding an invalid waiver where the accused, who had invoked his right to counsel, made incriminating statements when he was later approached by another officer and fully advised of his rights). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.