12 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Vancegreen2 sentences2017See Allen, 482 N.W.2d at 233 . “[W]hen a reviewing court concludes that a district court based a departure on both valid and invalid factors, a remand is required unless it determines the district court would have imposed the same sentence absent reliance on the invalid factors.” State v. Vance, 765 N.W.2d 390, 395 (Minn. 2009) (quotation omitted). 2014See State v. Manley, 664 N.W.2d 275, 286 (Minn. 2003) (granting state’s motion to strike paragraphs from pro se brief that were “unsupported by any facts in the record”). 15 Remand Not Necessary “[W]hen a reviewing court concludes that a district court based a departure on both valid and invalid factors, a remand is required unless it determines the district court would have imposed the same sentence absent reliance on the invalid factors.” State v. Vance, 765 N.W.2d 390, 395 (Minn. 2009) (quotation omitted). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Allengreen1 sentence2017See Allen, 482 N.W.2d at 233 . “[W]hen a reviewing court concludes that a district court based a departure on both valid and invalid factors, a remand is required unless it determines the district court would have imposed the same sentence absent reliance on the invalid factors.” State v. Vance, 765 N.W.2d 390, 395 (Minn. 2009) (quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Correa-Torresgreen2 sentences2015See Correa-Torres, 326 F.3d at 25 ; see also State v. Modtland, 695 N.W.2d 602, 608 (Minn.2005) (reversing and remanding for "a new hearing” on the district court's revocation of probation because it did not address whether the probation violation was intentional or inexcusable or whether the need for confinement outweighed the policies favoring probation). 2015See Correa-Torres, 326 F.3d at 25 ; see also State v. Modtland, 695 N.W.2d 602, 608 (Minn. 2005) (reversing and remanding for “a new hearing” on the district court’s revocation of probation because it did not address whether the probation violation was intentional or inexcusable or whether the need for confinement outweighed the policies favoring probation). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Modtlandgreen2 sentences2015See Correa-Torres, 326 F.3d at 25 ; see also State v. Modtland, 695 N.W.2d 602, 608 (Minn.2005) (reversing and remanding for "a new hearing” on the district court's revocation of probation because it did not address whether the probation violation was intentional or inexcusable or whether the need for confinement outweighed the policies favoring probation). 2015See Correa-Torres, 326 F.3d at 25 ; see also State v. Modtland, 695 N.W.2d 602, 608 (Minn. 2005) (reversing and remanding for “a new hearing” on the district court’s revocation of probation because it did not address whether the probation violation was intentional or inexcusable or whether the need for confinement outweighed the policies favoring probation). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Manleygreen1 sentence2014See State v. Manley, 664 N.W.2d 275, 286 (Minn. 2003) (granting state’s motion to strike paragraphs from pro se brief that were “unsupported by any facts in the record”). 15 Remand Not Necessary “[W]hen a reviewing court concludes that a district court based a departure on both valid and invalid factors, a remand is required unless it determines the district court would have imposed the same sentence absent reliance on the invalid factors.” State v. Vance, 765 N.W.2d 390, 395 (Minn. 2009) (quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Warndahlgreen1 sentence1996Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 20-22 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 827 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) (requiring reversal of some constitutional errors only if they were not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); see also State v. Warndahl, 436 N.W.2d 770, 776 (Minn.1989) (applying harmless error analysis after finding trial court improperly admitted the defendant’s statements made in violation of his right to counsel). | 1 | 1 |
Sheridan v. Sheridangreen2 sentences1987Sheridan v. Sheridan, 213 Minn. 24, 29 , 4 N.W.2d 785, 788 (1942). 1987Sheridan v. Sheridan, 213 Minn. 24, 29 , 4 N.W.2d 785, 788 (1942). | 1 | 1 |
United Realty Trust v. Property Development & Research Co.green1 sentence1986See, e.g., United Realty Trust v. Property Development and Research Co., 269 N.W.2d 737, 742 (Minn.1978) (“The Supreme Court held that usury laws are penal in nature and that the repeal of such laws without a saving clause operates retrospectively, cutting off the defense of usury in all future actions, even upon contracts previously entered. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Camacho
green
1 sentence2026State v. Camacho, 561 N.W.2d 160 , 170–71 (Minn. 1997). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Good Neighbor Care Centers, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services
green
1 sentence2012Thus, PERA’s interpretative rule excluding the city’s salary-supplement payments from relators’ PERA salary is an invalid rule, which “cannot be used as the basis for agency action.” Good Neighbor, 428 N.W.2d at 402 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Koon v. United States
red
2 sentences2009The United States Supreme Court has stated that “[w]hen a reviewing court concludes that a district court based a departure on both valid and invalid factors, a remand is required unless it determines the district court would have imposed the same sentence absent reliance on the invalid factors.” Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81, 113 , 116 S.Ct. 2035 , 135 L.Ed.2d 392 (1996). 2009The United States Supreme Court has stated that “[w]hen a reviewing court concludes that a district court based a departure on both valid and invalid factors, a remand is required unless it determines the district court would have imposed the same sentence absent reliance on the invalid factors.” Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81, 113 , 116 S.Ct. 2035 , 135 L.Ed.2d 392 (1996). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Chapman v. California
red
2 sentences1996Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 20-22 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 827 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) (requiring reversal of some constitutional errors only if they were not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); see also State v. Warndahl, 436 N.W.2d 770, 776 (Minn.1989) (applying harmless error analysis after finding trial court improperly admitted the defendant’s statements made in violation of his right to counsel). 1996Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 20-22 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 827 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) (requiring reversal of some constitutional errors only if they were not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); see also State v. Warndahl, 436 N.W.2d 770, 776 (Minn.1989) (applying harmless error analysis after finding trial court improperly admitted the defendant’s statements made in violation of his right to counsel). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
McGilllicuddy v. Civil Service Commission
green
2 sentences1976In McGillicuddy v. Civil Service Comm. 133 Cal. App. 782 , 24 P. 2d 942 (1933), the civil service commission promulgated a rule which extended temporary appointments for a period longer than that permitted by law. 1976In McGillicuddy v. Civil Service Comm. 133 Cal. App. 782 , 24 P. 2d 942 (1933), the civil service commission promulgated a rule which extended temporary appointments for a period longer than that permitted by law. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Hayman v. City of Galveston
green
2 sentences1960The court there directed attention to the “axiomatic” rule that licensed physicians have no constitutional right to practice in a hospital maintained by state or political subdivision (Hayman v. City of Galveston, 273 U. S. 414 , 47 S. Ct. 363 , 71 L. ed. 714) and approved the principle that municipalities may prescribe regulations for physicians using hospital facilities, citing Green v. City of St. 1960The court there directed attention to the “axiomatic” rule that licensed physicians have no constitutional right to practice in a hospital maintained by state or political subdivision (Hayman v. City of Galveston, 273 U. S. 414 , 47 S. Ct. 363 , 71 L. ed. 714) and approved the principle that municipalities may prescribe regulations for physicians using hospital facilities, citing Green v. City of St. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Findlay v. Board of Sup'rs of County of Mohave
green
2 sentences1960In Findlay v. Board of Supervisors, 72 Ariz. 58 , 230 P. (2d) 526 , 24 A.L.R. (2d) 841, the court held invalid a rule requiring one doctor on a staff to assist another staff doctor on the theory that it involved an attempt to control the relationship between doctors rather than the administration of hospital facilities. 1960In Findlay v. Board of Supervisors, 72 Ariz. 58 , 230 P. (2d) 526 , 24 A.L.R. (2d) 841, the court held invalid a rule requiring one doctor on a staff to assist another staff doctor on the theory that it involved an attempt to control the relationship between doctors rather than the administration of hospital facilities. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.