case-specific inquiry in Michigan

2004Id. at 577 , citing Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 US 1003, 1015 ; 112 S Ct 2886 ; 120 L Ed 2d 798 (1992).

2004Id. at 577 , citing Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 US 1003, 1015 ; 112 S Ct 2886 ; 120 L Ed 2d 798 (1992).

2007When a governmental taking results from an actual, physical invasion of the property, “ ‘a reviewing court need not apply a case-specific analysis, and the owner should automatically recover for a taking of his property.’ ” Adams Outdoor Advertising, supra at 23-24, quoting K & K Constr, Inc v Dep’t of Natural Resources, 456 Mich 570, 577 ; 575 NW2d 531 (1998).

2007When a governmental taking results from an actual, physical invasion of the property, “ ‘a reviewing court need not apply a case-specific analysis, and the owner should automatically recover for a taking of his property.’ ” Adams Outdoor Advertising, supra at 23-24, quoting K & K Constr, Inc v Dep’t of Natural Resources, 456 Mich 570, 577 ; 575 NW2d 531 (1998).

1998Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass’n v DeBenedictis, 480 US 470, 485 ; 107 S Ct 1232 ; 94 L Ed 2d 472 (1987).

1998Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass’n v DeBenedictis, 480 US 470, 485 ; 107 S Ct 1232 ; 94 L Ed 2d 472 (1987).

2025Id. 728 .

2020The doctrine, in short, requires a case-specific inquiry that informs how a court must adjudicate certain claims within its subject matter jurisdiction; it does not determine whether the court has such jurisdiction in the first place. [Id.] In Jones v Wolf, 443 US 595 ; 99 S Ct 3020 ; 61 L Ed 2d 775 (1979), a case involving a property dispute between two separating factions of a Georgia congregation, the Georgia Supreme Court adopted what has become known as the “neutral principles of law” method.

2020The doctrine, in short, requires a case-specific inquiry that informs how a court must adjudicate certain claims within its subject matter jurisdiction; it does not determine whether the court has such jurisdiction in the first place. [Id.] In Jones v Wolf, 443 US 595 ; 99 S Ct 3020 ; 61 L Ed 2d 775 (1979), a case involving a property dispute between two separating factions of a Georgia congregation, the Georgia Supreme Court adopted what has become known as the “neutral principles of law” method.

2019The doctrine, in short, requires a case-specific inquiry that informs how a court must adjudicate certain claims within its subject matter jurisdiction[.] [Id. at 337-341 (quotation marks and citations omitted).] * * * It is for the circuit court, in the first instance, to determine whether and to what extent the adjudication of the legal and factual issues presented by the plaintiff’s claim would require the resolution of ecclesiastical questions (and thus deference to any answers the church has provided to those questions). [Id. at 343.] In Chabad-Lubavitch of Mich v Schuchman, 305 Mich App

2019The doctrine, in short, requires a case-specific inquiry that informs how a court must adjudicate certain claims within its subject matter jurisdiction[.] [Id. at 337-341 (quotation marks and citations omitted).] * * * It is for the circuit court, in the first instance, to determine whether and to what extent the adjudication of the legal and factual issues presented by the plaintiff’s claim would require the resolution of ecclesiastical questions (and thus deference to any answers the church has provided to those questions). [Id. at 343.] In Chabad-Lubavitch of Mich v Schuchman, 305 Mich App

2019Bennison [v Sharp], 121 Mich App [705,] 713-714, 329 NW2d 466 [(1982)].

2007When a governmental taking results from an actual, physical invasion of the property, "`a reviewing court need not apply a case-specific analysis, and the owner should automatically recover for *908 a taking of his property.'" Adams Outdoor Advertising, supra at 23-24, 614 N.W.2d 634 , quoting K & K Const., Inc. v. Dep't of Natural Resources, 456 Mich. 570, 577 , 575 N.W.2d 531 (1998).