Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kell v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See, e.g., Kell v. State, 2012 UT 25 , ¶¶ 10‒12, 285 P.3d 1133 ; Patterson v. Patterson, 2011 UT 68 , ¶¶ 10‒21, 266 P.3d 828 ; McKell v. McKell, 2024 UT App 72 , ¶¶ 21‒30, 549 P.3d 654 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 89 (Utah 2024); State v. Granere, 2024 UT App 1 , ¶¶ 28‒32, 543 P.3d 177 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 87 (Utah 2024). 2025See, e.g., Kell v. State, 2012 UT 25 , ¶¶ 10‒12, 285 P.3d 1133 ; Patterson v. Patterson, 2011 UT 68 , ¶¶ 10‒21, 266 P.3d 828 ; McKell v. McKell, 2024 UT App 72 , ¶¶ 21‒30, 549 P.3d 654 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 89 (Utah 2024); State v. Granere, 2024 UT App 1 , ¶¶ 28‒32, 543 P.3d 177 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 87 (Utah 2024). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Westgreen2 sentences2005See id. at 91 , 823 N.E.2d 82 . 2005See id. at 91 , 823 N.E.2d 82 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Patterson v. Patterson
green
2 sentences2025See, e.g., Kell v. State, 2012 UT 25 , ¶¶ 10‒12, 285 P.3d 1133 ; Patterson v. Patterson, 2011 UT 68 , ¶¶ 10‒21, 266 P.3d 828 ; McKell v. McKell, 2024 UT App 72 , ¶¶ 21‒30, 549 P.3d 654 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 89 (Utah 2024); State v. Granere, 2024 UT App 1 , ¶¶ 28‒32, 543 P.3d 177 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 87 (Utah 2024). 2025See, e.g., Kell v. State, 2012 UT 25 , ¶¶ 10‒12, 285 P.3d 1133 ; Patterson v. Patterson, 2011 UT 68 , ¶¶ 10‒21, 266 P.3d 828 ; McKell v. McKell, 2024 UT App 72 , ¶¶ 21‒30, 549 P.3d 654 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 89 (Utah 2024); State v. Granere, 2024 UT App 1 , ¶¶ 28‒32, 543 P.3d 177 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 87 (Utah 2024). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Granere
green
2 sentences2025See, e.g., Kell v. State, 2012 UT 25 , ¶¶ 10‒12, 285 P.3d 1133 ; Patterson v. Patterson, 2011 UT 68 , ¶¶ 10‒21, 266 P.3d 828 ; McKell v. McKell, 2024 UT App 72 , ¶¶ 21‒30, 549 P.3d 654 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 89 (Utah 2024); State v. Granere, 2024 UT App 1 , ¶¶ 28‒32, 543 P.3d 177 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 87 (Utah 2024). 2025See, e.g., Kell v. State, 2012 UT 25 , ¶¶ 10‒12, 285 P.3d 1133 ; Patterson v. Patterson, 2011 UT 68 , ¶¶ 10‒21, 266 P.3d 828 ; McKell v. McKell, 2024 UT App 72 , ¶¶ 21‒30, 549 P.3d 654 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 89 (Utah 2024); State v. Granere, 2024 UT App 1 , ¶¶ 28‒32, 543 P.3d 177 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 87 (Utah 2024). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
McKell v. McKell
green
2 sentences2025See, e.g., Kell v. State, 2012 UT 25 , ¶¶ 10‒12, 285 P.3d 1133 ; Patterson v. Patterson, 2011 UT 68 , ¶¶ 10‒21, 266 P.3d 828 ; McKell v. McKell, 2024 UT App 72 , ¶¶ 21‒30, 549 P.3d 654 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 89 (Utah 2024); State v. Granere, 2024 UT App 1 , ¶¶ 28‒32, 543 P.3d 177 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 87 (Utah 2024). 2025See, e.g., Kell v. State, 2012 UT 25 , ¶¶ 10‒12, 285 P.3d 1133 ; Patterson v. Patterson, 2011 UT 68 , ¶¶ 10‒21, 266 P.3d 828 ; McKell v. McKell, 2024 UT App 72 , ¶¶ 21‒30, 549 P.3d 654 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 89 (Utah 2024); State v. Granere, 2024 UT App 1 , ¶¶ 28‒32, 543 P.3d 177 , cert. denied, 558 P.3d 87 (Utah 2024). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Utah Transit Authority v. Local 382 of the Amalgamated Transit Union
green
1 sentence2021Authority, 2012 UT 75, ¶ 38 ). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Wallingford v. Moab City
green
1 sentence2020In response to Citizens’ argument that the City did not have the authority to circumvent statute or ordinance by way of contract, the district court took a broad view of the City’s power to contract, determining that it could review the City’s contracting decisions only for “collusion” or “bad faith.” The court apparently drew this standard from Utah case law arising (continued…) 20180524-CA 18 2020 UT App 12 Wallingford v. Moab City ¶29 The City certainly has the power to enter into and adopt contracts like the ZSA, and nothing in this opinion should be construed to the contrary. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Levin
green
1 sentence2012Levin, 2006 UT 50 , 1 25 144 P.8d 1096 (internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.