inconsistent claim (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

inconsistent claim in Washington

13 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Mathews v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1988 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Id. at 63, 66 .

11
Riss v. Angelgreen
wash · 1997 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008The Riss opinion clarified that including a specific restriction in a covenant has the legal effect of signaling the document’s intent “that the specific restriction apply rather than an inconsistent standard under a general consent to construction covenant.” Id. at 625-26.

2008“Specific, objective restrictive covenants involve primarily a nondiscretionary, ministerial procedure.” Id. at 625 (citing Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc., 35 Del.

11
Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hillsgreen
delch · 1956 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008"Specific, objective restrictive covenants involve primarily a nondiscretionary, ministerial procedure." Id. at 625, 934 P.2d 669 (citing Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc., 35 Del.Ch. 543 , 122 A.2d 910, 912 (1956)). ¶ 19 Riss interpreted a covenant that bound owners in a subdivision in a fashion similar to the covenants here.

11
State v. Galisiagreen
washctapp · 1992 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993See, e.g., State v. Galisia, 63 Wn.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
State v. McClam green
washctapp · 1993
2 sentences

2000McClam, 69 Wash.App. at 890 , 850 P.2d 1377 .

2000McClam, 69 Wn.

31999–2000
Taylor v. Bell green
washctapp · 2014
2 sentences

2026Taylor v. Bell, 185 Wn.

2017Taylor v. Bell, 185 Wn.

22017–2026
Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc. green
delch · 1956
2 sentences

2008"Specific, objective restrictive covenants involve primarily a nondiscretionary, ministerial procedure." Id. at 625, 934 P.2d 669 (citing Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc., 35 Del.Ch. 543 , 122 A.2d 910, 912 (1956)). ¶ 19 Riss interpreted a covenant that bound owners in a subdivision in a fashion similar to the covenants here.

2008“Specific, objective restrictive covenants involve primarily a nondiscretionary, ministerial procedure.” Id. at 625 (citing Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc., 35 Del.

22008–2008
City of Kennewick v. Board for Volunteer Firefighters green
washctapp · 1997
2 sentences

2005City of Kennewick v. Bd. for Volunteer Firefighters, 85 Wn.

2005City of Kennewick v. Bd. for Volunteer Fire Fighters, 85 Wash.App. 366, 370 , 933 P.2d 423 (1997).

22005–2005
State v. Hurchalla green
washctapp · 1994
2 sentences

2000The discussion of State v. Hurchalla, 75 Wash. App. 417 , 877 P.2d 1293 (1994), State v. McClam , and State v. McJimpson, 79 Wash. App. 164 , 901 P.2d 354 (1995), is of marginal relevance since all three were lesser included offense cases.

2000The discussion of State v. Hurchalla, 75 Wn.

22000–2000
Riss v. Angel green
wash · 1997
2 sentences

2008The Riss opinion clarified that including a specific restriction in a covenant has the legal effect of signaling the document's intent "that the specific restriction apply rather than an inconsistent standard under a general consent to construction covenant." Id. at 625-26, 934 P.2d 669 .

2008"Specific, objective restrictive covenants involve primarily a nondiscretionary, ministerial procedure." Id. at 625, 934 P.2d 669 (citing Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc., 35 Del.Ch. 543 , 122 A.2d 910, 912 (1956)). ¶ 19 Riss interpreted a covenant that bound owners in a subdivision in a fashion similar to the covenants here.

12008–2008
State v. McJimpson green
washctapp · 1995
1 sentence

2000The discussion of State v. Hurchalla, 75 Wash. App. 417 , 877 P.2d 1293 (1994), State v. McClam , and State v. McJimpson, 79 Wash. App. 164 , 901 P.2d 354 (1995), is of marginal relevance since all three were lesser included offense cases.

12000–2000
State v. McJimpson green
washctapp · 1995
1 sentence

2000The discussion of State v. Hurchalla, 75 Wash. App. 417 , 877 P.2d 1293 (1994), State v. McClam , and State v. McJimpson, 79 Wash. App. 164 , 901 P.2d 354 (1995), is of marginal relevance since all three were lesser included offense cases.

12000–2000
Board of Regents of the University v. City of Seattle green
wash · 1987
2 sentences

1991Cf. Board of Regents v. Seattle, 108 Wn.2d 545, 553 , 741 P.2d 11 (1987) (silence coupled with knowledge of an adverse claim will estop party from later asserting an inconsistent claim); and Voel-ker v. Joseph, 62 Wn.2d 429, 436 , 383 P.2d 301 (1963) (doctrine of implied waiver by silence or acquiescence is invoked only where a forfeiture would otherwise result).

1991Cf. Board of Regents v. Seattle, 108 Wn.2d 545, 553 , 741 P.2d 11 (1987) (silence coupled with knowledge of an adverse claim will estop party from later asserting an inconsistent claim); and Voel-ker v. Joseph, 62 Wn.2d 429, 436 , 383 P.2d 301 (1963) (doctrine of implied waiver by silence or acquiescence is invoked only where a forfeiture would otherwise result).

11991–1991
Voelker v. Joseph green
wash · 1963
2 sentences

1991Cf. Board of Regents v. Seattle, 108 Wn.2d 545, 553 , 741 P.2d 11 (1987) (silence coupled with knowledge of an adverse claim will estop party from later asserting an inconsistent claim); and Voel-ker v. Joseph, 62 Wn.2d 429, 436 , 383 P.2d 301 (1963) (doctrine of implied waiver by silence or acquiescence is invoked only where a forfeiture would otherwise result).

1991Cf. Board of Regents v. Seattle, 108 Wn.2d 545, 553 , 741 P.2d 11 (1987) (silence coupled with knowledge of an adverse claim will estop party from later asserting an inconsistent claim); and Voel-ker v. Joseph, 62 Wn.2d 429, 436 , 383 P.2d 301 (1963) (doctrine of implied waiver by silence or acquiescence is invoked only where a forfeiture would otherwise result).

11991–1991
Beggs v. City of Pasco green
wash · 1980
2 sentences

1984Beggs v. Pasco, 93 Wn.2d 682, 689 , 611 P.2d 1252 (1980).

1984Beggs v. Pasco, 93 Wn.2d 682, 689 , 611 P.2d 1252 (1980).

11984–1984

Where else courts name it

NY 23 (1920–2024) CA 21 (1925–2024) IN 13 (1977–2025) WA 13 (1984–2026) GA 10 (1918–2021) TX 10 (1913–2022) FL 9 (1968–2021) CO 8 (1984–2024) MI 8 (1927–2024) NC 8 (1927–2002) MO 8 (1967–2019) MD 6 (1969–2016) IA 6 (1884–2015) CT 6 (1932–2010) KS 6 (1895–2024) OH 4 (1912–2025) NM 4 (1983–2019) AL 4 (1888–1983) IL 4 (1911–2016) NJ 3 (1973–2023) AZ 3 (1989–2023) MN 3 (1905–1987) PA 3 (2017–2024) KY 3 (1913–2025) OR 3 (1900–1987) WI 2 (2007–2011) MA 2 (1996–2025) NH 2 (1972–2018) OK 2 (1931–1985) NE 2 (1928–1982) WV 2 (1911–1999) SC 2 (1973–1986)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check