13 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mathews v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2019Id. at 63, 66 . | 1 | 1 |
Riss v. Angelgreen2 sentences2008The Riss opinion clarified that including a specific restriction in a covenant has the legal effect of signaling the document’s intent “that the specific restriction apply rather than an inconsistent standard under a general consent to construction covenant.” Id. at 625-26. 2008“Specific, objective restrictive covenants involve primarily a nondiscretionary, ministerial procedure.” Id. at 625 (citing Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc., 35 Del. | 1 | 1 |
Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hillsgreen1 sentence2008"Specific, objective restrictive covenants involve primarily a nondiscretionary, ministerial procedure." Id. at 625, 934 P.2d 669 (citing Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc., 35 Del.Ch. 543 , 122 A.2d 910, 912 (1956)). ¶ 19 Riss interpreted a covenant that bound owners in a subdivision in a fashion similar to the covenants here. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Galisiagreen1 sentence1993See, e.g., State v. Galisia, 63 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. McClam
green
2 sentences2000McClam, 69 Wash.App. at 890 , 850 P.2d 1377 . 2000McClam, 69 Wn. | 3 | 1999–2000 |
Taylor v. Bell
green
2 sentences2026Taylor v. Bell, 185 Wn. 2017Taylor v. Bell, 185 Wn. | 2 | 2017–2026 |
Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008"Specific, objective restrictive covenants involve primarily a nondiscretionary, ministerial procedure." Id. at 625, 934 P.2d 669 (citing Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc., 35 Del.Ch. 543 , 122 A.2d 910, 912 (1956)). ¶ 19 Riss interpreted a covenant that bound owners in a subdivision in a fashion similar to the covenants here. 2008“Specific, objective restrictive covenants involve primarily a nondiscretionary, ministerial procedure.” Id. at 625 (citing Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc., 35 Del. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
City of Kennewick v. Board for Volunteer Firefighters
green
2 sentences2005City of Kennewick v. Bd. for Volunteer Firefighters, 85 Wn. 2005City of Kennewick v. Bd. for Volunteer Fire Fighters, 85 Wash.App. 366, 370 , 933 P.2d 423 (1997). | 2 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Hurchalla
green
2 sentences2000The discussion of State v. Hurchalla, 75 Wash. App. 417 , 877 P.2d 1293 (1994), State v. McClam , and State v. McJimpson, 79 Wash. App. 164 , 901 P.2d 354 (1995), is of marginal relevance since all three were lesser included offense cases. 2000The discussion of State v. Hurchalla, 75 Wn. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Riss v. Angel
green
2 sentences2008The Riss opinion clarified that including a specific restriction in a covenant has the legal effect of signaling the document's intent "that the specific restriction apply rather than an inconsistent standard under a general consent to construction covenant." Id. at 625-26, 934 P.2d 669 . 2008"Specific, objective restrictive covenants involve primarily a nondiscretionary, ministerial procedure." Id. at 625, 934 P.2d 669 (citing Alliegro v. Home Owners of Edgewood Hills, Inc., 35 Del.Ch. 543 , 122 A.2d 910, 912 (1956)). ¶ 19 Riss interpreted a covenant that bound owners in a subdivision in a fashion similar to the covenants here. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. McJimpson
green
1 sentence2000The discussion of State v. Hurchalla, 75 Wash. App. 417 , 877 P.2d 1293 (1994), State v. McClam , and State v. McJimpson, 79 Wash. App. 164 , 901 P.2d 354 (1995), is of marginal relevance since all three were lesser included offense cases. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. McJimpson
green
1 sentence2000The discussion of State v. Hurchalla, 75 Wash. App. 417 , 877 P.2d 1293 (1994), State v. McClam , and State v. McJimpson, 79 Wash. App. 164 , 901 P.2d 354 (1995), is of marginal relevance since all three were lesser included offense cases. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Board of Regents of the University v. City of Seattle
green
2 sentences1991Cf. Board of Regents v. Seattle, 108 Wn.2d 545, 553 , 741 P.2d 11 (1987) (silence coupled with knowledge of an adverse claim will estop party from later asserting an inconsistent claim); and Voel-ker v. Joseph, 62 Wn.2d 429, 436 , 383 P.2d 301 (1963) (doctrine of implied waiver by silence or acquiescence is invoked only where a forfeiture would otherwise result). 1991Cf. Board of Regents v. Seattle, 108 Wn.2d 545, 553 , 741 P.2d 11 (1987) (silence coupled with knowledge of an adverse claim will estop party from later asserting an inconsistent claim); and Voel-ker v. Joseph, 62 Wn.2d 429, 436 , 383 P.2d 301 (1963) (doctrine of implied waiver by silence or acquiescence is invoked only where a forfeiture would otherwise result). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Voelker v. Joseph
green
2 sentences1991Cf. Board of Regents v. Seattle, 108 Wn.2d 545, 553 , 741 P.2d 11 (1987) (silence coupled with knowledge of an adverse claim will estop party from later asserting an inconsistent claim); and Voel-ker v. Joseph, 62 Wn.2d 429, 436 , 383 P.2d 301 (1963) (doctrine of implied waiver by silence or acquiescence is invoked only where a forfeiture would otherwise result). 1991Cf. Board of Regents v. Seattle, 108 Wn.2d 545, 553 , 741 P.2d 11 (1987) (silence coupled with knowledge of an adverse claim will estop party from later asserting an inconsistent claim); and Voel-ker v. Joseph, 62 Wn.2d 429, 436 , 383 P.2d 301 (1963) (doctrine of implied waiver by silence or acquiescence is invoked only where a forfeiture would otherwise result). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Beggs v. City of Pasco
green
2 sentences1984Beggs v. Pasco, 93 Wn.2d 682, 689 , 611 P.2d 1252 (1980). 1984Beggs v. Pasco, 93 Wn.2d 682, 689 , 611 P.2d 1252 (1980). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.