12 Arizona opinions name it 3 courts 1982–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of Scottsdalegreen1 sentence2021Devcor, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale, 168 Ariz. 426, 432 (1991)). ¶16 Section 19-118(E) provides, in part, that: If a registered circulator is properly served with a subpoena to provide evidence in an action regarding circulation of petitions and fails to appear or produce documents as provided for in the subpoena, all signatures collected by that circulator are deemed invalid. ¶17 Based on the elements of the statute, we conclude that a three- part analysis is appropriate to determine whether a party complied with § 19-118(E). | 1 | 1 |
Long v. Napolitanogreen2 sentences2014Long, 203 Ariz. at 253, ¶ 14 , 53 P.3d at 178 (citing Republic Inv., 166 Ariz. at 149 , 800 P.2d at 1257 ). 2014Long, 203 Ariz. at 253, ¶ 14 , 53 P.3d at 178 (citing Republic Inv., 166 Ariz. at 149 , 800 P.2d at 1257 ). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Ryan A.green2 sentences2007William L., 211 Ariz. at 289, ¶¶ 12, 14-17 , 119 P.3d at 1042 ; Ryan A., 202 Ariz. at 24, ¶ 20 , 39 P.3d at 548 . 2007William L., 211 Ariz. at 289, ¶¶ 12, 14-17 , 119 P.3d at 1042 ; Ryan A., 202 Ariz. at 24, ¶ 20 , 39 P.3d at 548 . | 1 | 1 |
In Re William L.green2 sentences2007William L., 211 Ariz. at 289, ¶¶ 12, 14-17 , 119 P.3d at 1042 ; Ryan A., 202 Ariz. at 24, ¶ 20 , 39 P.3d at 548 . 2007William L., 211 Ariz. at 289, ¶¶ 12, 14-17 , 119 P.3d at 1042 ; Ryan A., 202 Ariz. at 24, ¶ 20 , 39 P.3d at 548 . | 1 | 1 |
Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.green2 sentences1982See Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 114 Ariz. 309 , 560 P.2d 1216 (1977). 1982See Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 114 Ariz. 309 , 560 P.2d 1216 (1977). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprise
green
2 sentences1996Fund I , our supreme court developed a three part analysis: a law is not special legislation if it (1) bears a “rational relationship to a legitimate legislative objective”; and (2) “the classification encompasses all members of the relevant class”; and (3) “the class is elastic, allowing members to move into and out of the class.” 166 Ariz. at 149 , 800 P.2d at 1257 (citing Arizona Downs, 130 Ariz. at 557-58 , 637 P.2d at 1060-61 ). a. 1996Fund I , our supreme court developed a three part analysis: a law is not special legislation if it (1) bears a “rational relationship to a legitimate legislative objective”; and (2) “the classification encompasses all members of the relevant class”; and (3) “the class is elastic, allowing members to move into and out of the class.” 166 Ariz. at 149 , 800 P.2d at 1257 (citing Arizona Downs, 130 Ariz. at 557-58 , 637 P.2d at 1060-61 ). a. | 2 | 1996–2014 |
Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson
red
2 sentences1989This presumption may be overcome if the three part test established in Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97 , 92 S.Ct. 349 , 30 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971) is met. 1989This presumption may be overcome if the three part test established in Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97 , 92 S.Ct. 349 , 30 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971) is met. | 2 | 1982–1989 |
State v. Gordon
green
2 sentences2023To determine whether A.R.S. § 13-116 permits consecutive sentences, we apply the three- part test set forth in State v. Gordon, 161 Ariz. 308 (1989). 2023First, we “subtract[] from the factual transaction the evidence necessary to convict on the ultimate charge,” which is often “the most serious” offense, to determine whether “the remaining evidence satisfies the elements of the other crime.” Id. at 315 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State Compensation Fund v. Symington
green
1 sentence2014Fund v. Symington, 174 Ariz. 188, 192 , 848 P.2d 272, 277 (1993). ¶10 The special law prohibition does not necessarily bar the legislature from enacting laws that confer privileges only on classes defined by population; however, such laws must comply with the three- part test adopted by our supreme court: Legislation does not violate the special law prohibition if (1) the classification is rationally related to a legitimate governmental objective, (2) the classification is legitimate, encompassing all members of the relevant class, and (3) the class is elastic, allowing members to move in and | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Davis
green
2 sentences2004Davis, 206 Ariz. at 385 ¶ 38, 79 P.3d at 72 . [18] DePiano disapproved Bartlett , deciding that courts could not examine the individual facts of any case to determine gross disproportionality as applied to that case. 2004Davis, 206 Ariz. at 385 ¶ 38, 79 P.3d at 72 . [18] DePiano disapproved Bartlett , deciding that courts could not examine the individual facts of any case to determine gross disproportionality as applied to that case. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima County
green
2 sentences1997We agree. *574 In order to determine whether a defendant has a right to a jury trial, Arizona courts apply the three part test set forth in Rothweiler v. Superior Court, 100 Ariz. 37 , 410 P.2d 479 (1966). 1997We agree. *574 In order to determine whether a defendant has a right to a jury trial, Arizona courts apply the three part test set forth in Rothweiler v. Superior Court, 100 Ariz. 37 , 410 P.2d 479 (1966). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's Foundation
green
2 sentences1996Fund I , our supreme court developed a three part analysis: a law is not special legislation if it (1) bears a “rational relationship to a legitimate legislative objective”; and (2) “the classification encompasses all members of the relevant class”; and (3) “the class is elastic, allowing members to move into and out of the class.” 166 Ariz. at 149 , 800 P.2d at 1257 (citing Arizona Downs, 130 Ariz. at 557-58 , 637 P.2d at 1060-61 ). a. 1996Fund I , our supreme court developed a three part analysis: a law is not special legislation if it (1) bears a “rational relationship to a legitimate legislative objective”; and (2) “the classification encompasses all members of the relevant class”; and (3) “the class is elastic, allowing members to move into and out of the class.” 166 Ariz. at 149 , 800 P.2d at 1257 (citing Arizona Downs, 130 Ariz. at 557-58 , 637 P.2d at 1060-61 ). a. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State Tax Commission v. Holmes & Narver, Inc.
green
2 sentences1994Id. at 169 , 548 P.2d at 1166 . 1994Id. at 169 , 548 P.2d at 1166 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
New York v. Burger
green
2 sentences1993Defendant further argues that even if a “business premises” exception exists, A.R.S. section 24-261(C) does not satisfy the three part test for this exception articulated in New York v. Burger, 482 U.S. 691 , 107 S.Ct. 2686 , 96 L.Ed.2d 601 (1987). 1993Defendant further argues that even if a “business premises” exception exists, A.R.S. section 24-261(C) does not satisfy the three part test for this exception articulated in New York v. Burger, 482 U.S. 691 , 107 S.Ct. 2686 , 96 L.Ed.2d 601 (1987). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Mathews v. Eldridge
green
2 sentences1982I would apply the three part test of Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976) appropriate to this consideration as follows: 1. 1982I would apply the three part test of Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976) appropriate to this consideration as follows: 1. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.