9 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.green1 sentence2009Of Township High School Dist. 205, Will City, 391 U.S. 563, 568 (1968)). -4- A three part test exists for analyzing a public employee’s claim of First Amendment retaliation. | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Keithgreen1 sentence2009Haynes v. City of Circleville, Ohio, et al., 474 F.3d 357, 362 (6th Cir. 2007)(citing Taylor v. Keith, 338 F.3d 639, 643 (6th Cir. 2003)). | 1 | 1 |
David H. Haynes v. City of Circleville, Ohiogreen1 sentence2009Haynes v. City of Circleville, Ohio, et al., 474 F.3d 357, 362 (6th Cir. 2007)(citing Taylor v. Keith, 338 F.3d 639, 643 (6th Cir. 2003)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hillgreen1 sentence1999State v. Hill, 954 S.W.2d 725, 726-727 (Tenn. 1997). | 1 | 1 |
Monday Villas Property Owners Assn. v. Barbegreen2 sentences1994The court applied a three part test to determine the reasonableness of the association’s actions: “(1) whether the decision was arbitrary and capricious, (2) whether it was nondiscriminatory and even-handed, and (3) whether it was made in good faith for the common welfare of the owners and occupants of the condominium.” Id. (quoting River Terrace Condominium Ass’n v. Lewis, 33 Ohio App.3d 52 , 514 N.E.2d 732 (1986). 1994The court further stated that there is law “to support the notion that rules created to affect the aesthetics and uniformity of appearance, and thereby depriving condominium owners of some freedom to do with their property as they wish, are valid.” Id., 598 N.E.2d at 1249 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.
green
2 sentences1999The Nicholstone court adopted the three part analysis of Southern Machine Co. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc., 401 F.2d 374 (6th Cir. 1968), stating as follows: First, the defendant must purposefully avail himself of the privilege of acting in the forum state or causing a consequence in the forum state. 1999The Nicholstone court adopted the three part analysis of Southern Machine Co. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc., 401 F.2d 374 (6th Cir. 1968), stating as follows: First, the defendant must purposefully avail himself of the privilege of acting in the forum state or causing a consequence in the forum state. | 3 | 1998–1999 |
State v. Grooms
green
1 sentence2024Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Henderson
green
1 sentence2010The appellant’s first argument on this issue is that the records do not satisfy the three- part test outlined in State v. Henderson, 554 S.W.2d 117 (Tenn. 1977). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Anthony
red
1 sentence1997Accordingly, based upon the due process concerns announced in Anthony, and the legislative focus of our current kidnapping statutes, we adopt the three part test utilized by other jurisdictions with similar statutory language.6 Moreover, we note that this test was cited to, with approval, in Anthony, 817 S.W.2d at 306 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
River Terrace Condominium Assn. v. Lewis
green
2 sentences1994The court applied a three part test to determine the reasonableness of the association’s actions: “(1) whether the decision was arbitrary and capricious, (2) whether it was nondiscriminatory and even-handed, and (3) whether it was made in good faith for the common welfare of the owners and occupants of the condominium.” Id. (quoting River Terrace Condominium Ass’n v. Lewis, 33 Ohio App.3d 52 , 514 N.E.2d 732 (1986). 1994The court applied a three part test to determine the reasonableness of the association’s actions: “(1) whether the decision was arbitrary and capricious, (2) whether it was nondiscriminatory and even-handed, and (3) whether it was made in good faith for the common welfare of the owners and occupants of the condominium.” Id. (quoting River Terrace Condominium Ass’n v. Lewis, 33 Ohio App.3d 52 , 514 N.E.2d 732 (1986). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.