Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Baldwin v. Stategreen2 sentences2024In analyzing the defendant’s speedy-trial claim, this Court noted the long- held rule that “delays attributable to a defendant’s claim of incompetency are charged against the defendant for Rule 4(C) purposes.” Id. at 1150 (citing Baldwin v. State, 274 Ind. 269, 271 , 411 N.E.2d 605, 606 (1980)). 2024In analyzing the defendant’s speedy-trial claim, this Court noted the long- held rule that “delays attributable to a defendant’s claim of incompetency are charged against the defendant for Rule 4(C) purposes.” Id. at 1150 (citing Baldwin v. State, 274 Ind. 269, 271 , 411 N.E.2d 605, 606 (1980)). | 1 | 1 |
Harder v. Stategreen1 sentence2020Id. at 1241 . [17] In Harder v. State, we also found that it was improper to revoke probation based upon proof of an act that is merely similar in nature to the violation charged in the written notice. 501 N.E.2d 1117, 1121 (Ind. Ct. App. 1986). | 1 | 1 |
A.J. v. Logansport State Hospitalgreen1 sentence2014See A.J. v. Logansport State Hosp., 956 N.E.2d 96, 109 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (citing Ind. Appellate R. 46(A)(8)(a)). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Stategreen1 sentence2014“The granting of a mistrial lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and we reverse only when an abuse of discretion is clearly shown.” Davis v. State, 770 N.E.2d 319, 325 (Ind. 2002), reh’g denied. | 1 | 1 |
Purvis v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Purvis v. State, 829 N.E.2d 572, 587 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006) (holding that in criminal bench trials, we presume that the trial court disregarded inadmissible testimony and rendered its decision solely on the basis of relevant and probative evidence). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Yiu Fong Cheung v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
green
2 sentences1981We think it in the interest of justice to vacate the deportation order and remand for further proceedings .... 418 F.2d at 465 . 1981We think it in the interest of justice to vacate the deportation order and remand for further proceedings.... 418 F.2d at 465 . | 2 | 1981–1981 |
Curtis v. State
green
1 sentence2024In analyzing the defendant’s speedy-trial claim, this Court noted the long- held rule that “delays attributable to a defendant’s claim of incompetency are charged against the defendant for Rule 4(C) purposes.” Id. at 1150 (citing Baldwin v. State, 274 Ind. 269, 271 , 411 N.E.2d 605, 606 (1980)). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Long v. State
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 1241 . [17] In Harder v. State, we also found that it was improper to revoke probation based upon proof of an act that is merely similar in nature to the violation charged in the written notice. 501 N.E.2d 1117, 1121 (Ind. Ct. App. 1986). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Will v. Michigan Department of State Police
green
2 sentences2016The trial court correctly dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. [11] In Bayh v. Sonnenburg, 573 N.E.2d 398 (Ind. 1991), our Supreme Court analyzed Section 1983 of Title 42, and followed United States Supreme Court precedent in Will v. Michigan Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 , 109 S. Ct. 2304 , 105 L. 2016The trial court correctly dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. [11] In Bayh v. Sonnenburg, 573 N.E.2d 398 (Ind. 1991), our Supreme Court analyzed Section 1983 of Title 42, and followed United States Supreme Court precedent in Will v. Michigan Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 , 109 S. Ct. 2304 , 105 L. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Bayh v. Sonnenburg
green
1 sentence2016The trial court correctly dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. [11] In Bayh v. Sonnenburg, 573 N.E.2d 398 (Ind. 1991), our Supreme Court analyzed Section 1983 of Title 42, and followed United States Supreme Court precedent in Will v. Michigan Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 , 109 S. Ct. 2304 , 105 L. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Wilson v. State
green
1 sentence2014Id. at 1264 . 1 Long argues the State has waived the abandonment issue because it did not raise abandonment during the hearing on Long’s motion to suppress. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Clark v. State
green
1 sentence1998Id. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Lang v. Midwest Advanced Computer Services, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1990Lang, supra. The trial court found Inglert was not an exempt employee and we do not think that finding was clearly erroneous. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Roth v. United States
green
2 sentences1966Roth v. United States (1957), 354 U. S. 476 , 77 S. Ct. 1304 , 1 L. 1966Roth v. United States (1957), 354 U. S. 476 , 77 S. Ct. 1304 , 1 L. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.