12 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1915–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Carmouchegreen1 sentence2010According to La.Code.Crim.P. art. 775(6), a mistrial may be ordered when “[f]alse statements of a juror on voir dire prevent a fair trial.” In State v. Carmouche, 01-405, p. 20 (La.5/14/02), 872 So.2d 1020, 1035 (citations omitted), the supreme court stated: The “prejudicial conduct” may include remarks of veniremen during voir dire. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Desdunesgreen1 sentence1994In State v. Desdunes, 579 So.2d 452, 452 (La.1991), the Supreme Court set out considerations that a judge must utilize to determine whether to grant a motion to correct an illegally lenient sentence: [T]he record should reflect consideration by the resentencing judge of the intent of the judge who imposed the original sentence, whether it be the same judge or another judge. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hodgesongreen1 sentence1990In State v. Hodgeson, 305 So.2d 421, 428 (La.1975) the court held that print-out sheets of business records stored in a computer were admissible under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, if relevant and material, without the necessity of producing the individual who made the entries in the regular course of business if it was shown that: 1) the computing equipment is recognized as standard equipment; 2) the entries are made in the regular course of business at or reasonably near the time when the recorded event occurred; and, 3) the foundation testimony satisfies the trial cour | 1 | 1 |
State v. Stephensgreen1 sentence1986Assignment of Error No. 8 The defendant moved for a mistrial because he was "paraded before jurors and prospective jurors manacled and handcuffed." This motion was denied, and the defendant assigns error. "[A] defendant should not be shackled or handcuffed before the court except under exceptional circumstances." State v. Stephens, 412 So.2d 1057, 1059 (La.1982). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Copelandgreen1 sentence1986A similar situation was encountered in State v. Copeland, 419 So.2d 899, 907 (La. 1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Crosby
green
2 sentences1993The defendant assigns as error the denial of fundamental due process in being sentenced under State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La.1976), where no hearing was held on his motion to suppress. 1986However, a review of the transcript of defendant’s guilty plea discloses that he did not reserve his right to appeal when he plead guilty as provided for in State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La.1976). | 2 | 1986–1993 |
Daugherty v. Domino's Pizza
green
1 sentence1998NOTES [1] The defendant assigns as error the workers' compensation hearing officer's statement in her "Reasons for Judgment," that "[J]urisprudence has held that facts and issues must be liberally construed in favor of the workers' compensation claimant." We are aware of the well-established principle that the worker's compensation laws should be liberally construed in favor of the claimant. (emphasis ours) Daugherty v. Domino's Pizza, 95-1394 (La.5/21/96), 674 So.2d 947 ; Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply Inc., 619 So.2d 52 (La.1993), and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
green
1 sentence1998NOTES [1] The defendant assigns as error the workers' compensation hearing officer's statement in her "Reasons for Judgment," that "[J]urisprudence has held that facts and issues must be liberally construed in favor of the workers' compensation claimant." We are aware of the well-established principle that the worker's compensation laws should be liberally construed in favor of the claimant. (emphasis ours) Daugherty v. Domino's Pizza, 95-1394 (La.5/21/96), 674 So.2d 947 ; Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply Inc., 619 So.2d 52 (La.1993), and cases cited therein. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Madison
green
1 sentence1986This court recognized in State v. Madison, 345 So.2d 485 (La.1977), that investigative assistance might be adjunct to the right of counsel. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Brogdon
green
1 sentence1984The defendant in State v. Brogdon, 426 So.2d 158 (La.1983), assigned as error the failure to comply with sentencing delay and complained of his sentence. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Passman
green
1 sentence1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
State v. Clark
green
1 sentence1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
State v. McIntyre
green
1 sentence1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Harris v. Tennessee
green
1 sentence1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Gould v. WFF-N-Proof
green
1 sentence1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Bernitsky v. United States
green
1 sentence1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
McIntyre v. Louisiana
green
1 sentence1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Dreier v. Yanik
green
1 sentence1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
State v. James
green
1 sentence1978In State v. James, La., 339 So.2d 741 (1976), we treated a similar situation as follows: "The general rule is that the trial jury is entitled to view photographic evidence introduced during the trial. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Brown
green
1 sentence1977State v. Anthony, La., 347 So.2d 483 (1977); State v. Finley, La., 341 So.2d 381 (1976); State v. Brown, La., 337 So.2d 484 (1976); State v. Jack, La., 332 So.2d 464 (1976); State v. Woods, La., 327 So.2d 405 (1976). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Woods
neutral
1 sentence1977State v. Anthony, La., 347 So.2d 483 (1977); State v. Finley, La., 341 So.2d 381 (1976); State v. Brown, La., 337 So.2d 484 (1976); State v. Jack, La., 332 So.2d 464 (1976); State v. Woods, La., 327 So.2d 405 (1976). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Finley
green
1 sentence1977State v. Anthony, La., 347 So.2d 483 (1977); State v. Finley, La., 341 So.2d 381 (1976); State v. Brown, La., 337 So.2d 484 (1976); State v. Jack, La., 332 So.2d 464 (1976); State v. Woods, La., 327 So.2d 405 (1976). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Anthony
green
1 sentence1977State v. Anthony, La., 347 So.2d 483 (1977); State v. Finley, La., 341 So.2d 381 (1976); State v. Brown, La., 337 So.2d 484 (1976); State v. Jack, La., 332 So.2d 464 (1976); State v. Woods, La., 327 So.2d 405 (1976). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Jack
green
1 sentence1977State v. Anthony, La., 347 So.2d 483 (1977); State v. Finley, La., 341 So.2d 381 (1976); State v. Brown, La., 337 So.2d 484 (1976); State v. Jack, La., 332 So.2d 464 (1976); State v. Woods, La., 327 So.2d 405 (1976). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside Mills
green
1 sentence1915Co. v. Riverside Mills, 219 U. S. 187 , 31 Sup. Ct. 164, 55 L. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.