defendant assigns error (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

defendant assigns error in Louisiana

12 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1915–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Carmouchegreen
la · 2003 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
1 sentence

2010According to La.Code.Crim.P. art. 775(6), a mistrial may be ordered when “[f]alse statements of a juror on voir dire prevent a fair trial.” In State v. Carmouche, 01-405, p. 20 (La.5/14/02), 872 So.2d 1020, 1035 (citations omitted), the supreme court stated: The “prejudicial conduct” may include remarks of veniremen during voir dire.

11
State v. Desdunesgreen
la · 1991 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
1 sentence

1994In State v. Desdunes, 579 So.2d 452, 452 (La.1991), the Supreme Court set out considerations that a judge must utilize to determine whether to grant a motion to correct an illegally lenient sentence: [T]he record should reflect consideration by the resentencing judge of the intent of the judge who imposed the original sentence, whether it be the same judge or another judge.

11
State v. Hodgesongreen
la · 1974 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990
1 sentence

1990In State v. Hodgeson, 305 So.2d 421, 428 (La.1975) the court held that print-out sheets of business records stored in a computer were admissible under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, if relevant and material, without the necessity of producing the individual who made the entries in the regular course of business if it was shown that: 1) the computing equipment is recognized as standard equipment; 2) the entries are made in the regular course of business at or reasonably near the time when the recorded event occurred; and, 3) the foundation testimony satisfies the trial cour

11
State v. Stephensgreen
la · 1982 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
1 sentence

1986Assignment of Error No. 8 The defendant moved for a mistrial because he was "paraded before jurors and prospective jurors manacled and handcuffed." This motion was denied, and the defendant assigns error. "[A] defendant should not be shackled or handcuffed before the court except under exceptional circumstances." State v. Stephens, 412 So.2d 1057, 1059 (La.1982).

11
State v. Copelandgreen
la · 1982 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
1 sentence

1986A similar situation was encountered in State v. Copeland, 419 So.2d 899, 907 (La. 1982).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (20)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Crosby green
la · 1976
2 sentences

1993The defendant assigns as error the denial of fundamental due process in being sentenced under State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La.1976), where no hearing was held on his motion to suppress.

1986However, a review of the transcript of defendant’s guilty plea discloses that he did not reserve his right to appeal when he plead guilty as provided for in State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La.1976).

21986–1993
Daugherty v. Domino's Pizza green
la · 1996
1 sentence

1998NOTES [1] The defendant assigns as error the workers' compensation hearing officer's statement in her "Reasons for Judgment," that "[J]urisprudence has held that facts and issues must be liberally construed in favor of the workers' compensation claimant." We are aware of the well-established principle that the worker's compensation laws should be liberally construed in favor of the claimant. (emphasis ours) Daugherty v. Domino's Pizza, 95-1394 (La.5/21/96), 674 So.2d 947 ; Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply Inc., 619 So.2d 52 (La.1993), and cases cited therein.

11998–1998
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc. green
la · 1993
1 sentence

1998NOTES [1] The defendant assigns as error the workers' compensation hearing officer's statement in her "Reasons for Judgment," that "[J]urisprudence has held that facts and issues must be liberally construed in favor of the workers' compensation claimant." We are aware of the well-established principle that the worker's compensation laws should be liberally construed in favor of the claimant. (emphasis ours) Daugherty v. Domino's Pizza, 95-1394 (La.5/21/96), 674 So.2d 947 ; Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply Inc., 619 So.2d 52 (La.1993), and cases cited therein.

11998–1998
State v. Madison green
la · 1977
1 sentence

1986This court recognized in State v. Madison, 345 So.2d 485 (La.1977), that investigative assistance might be adjunct to the right of counsel.

11986–1986
State v. Brogdon green
la · 1983
1 sentence

1984The defendant in State v. Brogdon, 426 So.2d 158 (La.1983), assigned as error the failure to comply with sentencing delay and complained of his sentence.

11984–1984
State v. Passman green
la · 1977
1 sentence

1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977).

11983–1983
State v. Clark green
la · 1976
1 sentence

1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977).

11983–1983
State v. McIntyre green
la · 1980
1 sentence

1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977).

11983–1983
Harris v. Tennessee green
scotus · 1977
1 sentence

1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977).

11983–1983
Gould v. WFF-N-Proof green
scotus · 1977
1 sentence

1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977).

11983–1983
Bernitsky v. United States green
scotus · 1980
1 sentence

1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977).

11983–1983
McIntyre v. Louisiana green
scotus · 1980
1 sentence

1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977).

11983–1983
Dreier v. Yanik green
scotus · 1980
1 sentence

1983State v. McIntyre, 381 So.2d 408 (La.1980), U.S. cert. den., 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980); State v. Passman, 345 So.2d 874 (La.1977); State v. Clark, 340 So.2d 208 (La.1976), U.S. cert. den., 430 U.S. 936 , 97 S.Ct. 1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977).

11983–1983
State v. James green
la · 1976
1 sentence

1978In State v. James, La., 339 So.2d 741 (1976), we treated a similar situation as follows: "The general rule is that the trial jury is entitled to view photographic evidence introduced during the trial.

11978–1978
State v. Brown green
la · 1976
1 sentence

1977State v. Anthony, La., 347 So.2d 483 (1977); State v. Finley, La., 341 So.2d 381 (1976); State v. Brown, La., 337 So.2d 484 (1976); State v. Jack, La., 332 So.2d 464 (1976); State v. Woods, La., 327 So.2d 405 (1976).

11977–1977
State v. Woods neutral
la · 1976
1 sentence

1977State v. Anthony, La., 347 So.2d 483 (1977); State v. Finley, La., 341 So.2d 381 (1976); State v. Brown, La., 337 So.2d 484 (1976); State v. Jack, La., 332 So.2d 464 (1976); State v. Woods, La., 327 So.2d 405 (1976).

11977–1977
State v. Finley green
la · 1976
1 sentence

1977State v. Anthony, La., 347 So.2d 483 (1977); State v. Finley, La., 341 So.2d 381 (1976); State v. Brown, La., 337 So.2d 484 (1976); State v. Jack, La., 332 So.2d 464 (1976); State v. Woods, La., 327 So.2d 405 (1976).

11977–1977
State v. Anthony green
la · 1977
1 sentence

1977State v. Anthony, La., 347 So.2d 483 (1977); State v. Finley, La., 341 So.2d 381 (1976); State v. Brown, La., 337 So.2d 484 (1976); State v. Jack, La., 332 So.2d 464 (1976); State v. Woods, La., 327 So.2d 405 (1976).

11977–1977
State v. Jack green
la · 1976
1 sentence

1977State v. Anthony, La., 347 So.2d 483 (1977); State v. Finley, La., 341 So.2d 381 (1976); State v. Brown, La., 337 So.2d 484 (1976); State v. Jack, La., 332 So.2d 464 (1976); State v. Woods, La., 327 So.2d 405 (1976).

11977–1977
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside Mills green
scotus · 1911
1 sentence

1915Co. v. Riverside Mills, 219 U. S. 187 , 31 Sup. Ct. 164, 55 L.

11915–1915

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:30 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:64 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NC 76 (1931–2022) MA 23 (1936–2025) OR 21 (1902–2011) NE 18 (1907–2017) CT 17 (1943–1985) GA 16 (1910–1968) LA 12 (1915–2010) WV 12 (1927–2018) WA 12 (1959–2019) TN 8 (1968–2013) VA 5 (1952–1987) CA 5 (1921–2020) MO 5 (1904–1935) OH 4 (1969–2007) NY 4 (1986–1990) OK 4 (1919–1955) IA 3 (1871–1928) MN 3 (1892–1961) RI 3 (1977–2012) IL 3 (1933–1975) ID 2 (1974–2023) IN 2 (1981–1984) AL 2 (1913–1917) AZ 2 (1959–1965)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check