benefits rule in Missouri

12 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2023 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (10)

Case	Followed	Cited
Koppenaal v. Director of Revenuegreen moctapp · 1999 · cited in 2 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2001–2005 2 sentences 2005We acknowledge that there is support for the notion that Mother’s failure to specifically rely on Rule 78.04 “is sufficient, in itself, to deny h[er] the benefits of that rule.” Koppenaal v. Director of Revenue, 987 S.W.2d 446, 451 (Mo.App. 2001See Koppenaal v. Director of Revenue, 987 S.W.2d 446, 451 (Mo.App.1999) (holding that failure of the Director to rely on Rule 73.01(a)(5) in his motion was “sufficient, in itself, to deny him the benefits of that rule.”).	2	2
Wooten v. Williamsgreen moctapp · 1992 · cited in 2 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1996–2005 2 sentences 2005W.D.1999) (citing Rule 73.01(a)(5) (1998), the former rule relating to a motion to amend the judgment); see also Wooten v. Williams, 827 S.W.2d 282 , 284 n. 2 (Mo.App. 1996Wooten v. Williams, 827 S.W.2d 282 , 284 n. 2 (Mo.App.1992).	1	2
Kyesha Mickles v. Maxi Beauty Supply, Inc., and Division of Employment Securitygreen moctapp · 2019 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023 1 sentence 2023However, because the Commission, which adopted the written decision of the Division of Employment Security (the “Division”), did not address Benoist’s eligibility for PUA benefits under this particular provision of the CARES Act, we cannot review the denial of Benoist’s benefits claim, as is our mandate under § 288.2101; see also Mickles v. Maxi Beauty Supply, Inc., 566 S.W.3d 274, 277 (Mo. App. E.D. 2019).	1	1
Finner v. Americold Logistics, LLCgreen moctapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022 1 sentence 2022As a preliminary matter, a misconduct analysis is warranted because, under our standard of review, “we will uphold a decision of the Commission if the Commission clearly got the right result, but for the wrong reason.” Id. at 807 (citing Finner v. Americold Logistics, LLC, 298 S.W.3d 580, 584 (Mo. App. S.D. 2009)).	1	1
Patterson v. Stategreen moctapp · 2005 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022 1 sentence 2022See, e.g., Washington v. State, 515 S.W.3d 786, 790 (Mo. App. W.D. 2017); Baird v. State, 512 S.W.3d 867, 869 (Mo. App. S.D. 2017); Patterson v. State, 164 S.W.3d 546, 548 (Mo. App. E.D. 2005); Stidham v. State, 963 S.W.2d 351 , 353 6 Because Robinson’s pro se motion was not timely filed, his post-conviction claims are waived, and his post-conviction proceeding should have been dismissed.	1	1
Baird v. Stategreen moctapp · 2017 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022 1 sentence 2022See, e.g., Washington v. State, 515 S.W.3d 786, 790 (Mo. App. W.D. 2017); Baird v. State, 512 S.W.3d 867, 869 (Mo. App. S.D. 2017); Patterson v. State, 164 S.W.3d 546, 548 (Mo. App. E.D. 2005); Stidham v. State, 963 S.W.2d 351 , 353 6 Because Robinson’s pro se motion was not timely filed, his post-conviction claims are waived, and his post-conviction proceeding should have been dismissed.	1	1
Anthony C. Washington v. Stategreen moctapp · 2017 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022 1 sentence 2022See, e.g., Washington v. State, 515 S.W.3d 786, 790 (Mo. App. W.D. 2017); Baird v. State, 512 S.W.3d 867, 869 (Mo. App. S.D. 2017); Patterson v. State, 164 S.W.3d 546, 548 (Mo. App. E.D. 2005); Stidham v. State, 963 S.W.2d 351 , 353 6 Because Robinson’s pro se motion was not timely filed, his post-conviction claims are waived, and his post-conviction proceeding should have been dismissed.	1	1
United States v. Leongreen scotus · 1984 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016 1 sentence 2016See, e.g., Leon, 468 U.S. at 922 (when police act under a warrant that is invalid for lack of probable cause, the exclusionary rule does not apply if the police acted "in objectively reasonable reliance" on the subsequently invalidated search warrant); Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 349-350 (1987) (exclusionary rule does not apply to warrantless administrative searches performed in good-faith reliance on a statute later declared unconstitutional); Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 , 14–15 (1995) (exclusionary rule does not apply where police reasonably rely in good faith on mistaken information i	1	1
Illinois v. Krullgreen scotus · 1987 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016 1 sentence 2016See, e.g., Leon, 468 U.S. at 922 (when police act under a warrant that is invalid for lack of probable cause, the exclusionary rule does not apply if the police acted "in objectively reasonable reliance" on the subsequently invalidated search warrant); Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 349-350 (1987) (exclusionary rule does not apply to warrantless administrative searches performed in good-faith reliance on a statute later declared unconstitutional); Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 , 14–15 (1995) (exclusionary rule does not apply where police reasonably rely in good faith on mistaken information i	1	1
Hammonds v. Havengreen mo · 1955 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 1 sentence 1976The rescuer will be allowed to recover against the originally negligent wrongdoer for injuries sustained in the rescue attempt if the jury does not find that the rescuer’s conduct was rash or reckless, Hammonds v. Haven, 280 S.W.2d 814, 816 (Mo.1955). 1 Unlike a majority of other jurisdictions, 2 Missouri has extended the benefits of this doctrine only to rescuers of persons and not to rescuers of property, Boyd v. Terminal R.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

Case	Cited	Years
State, Department of Labor & Industrial Relations v. Ron Woods Mechanical, Inc. green moctapp · 1996 2 sentences 2005This court held that the party’s “failure to specifically rely on Rule 73.01(a)(5) in their motion is sufficient, in itself, to deny it the benefits of the rule.” Id. 2000This court has held that a party’s “failure to specifically rely on Rule 73.01(a)(5) in [its] motion is sufficient, in itself, to deny it the benefits of this rule.” Ron Woods Mechanical, 926 S.W.2d at 540 .	3	1999–2005
Stidham v. State green moctapp · 1998 1 sentence 2022See, e.g., Washington v. State, 515 S.W.3d 786, 790 (Mo. App. W.D. 2017); Baird v. State, 512 S.W.3d 867, 869 (Mo. App. S.D. 2017); Patterson v. State, 164 S.W.3d 546, 548 (Mo. App. E.D. 2005); Stidham v. State, 963 S.W.2d 351 , 353 6 Because Robinson’s pro se motion was not timely filed, his post-conviction claims are waived, and his post-conviction proceeding should have been dismissed.	1	2022–2022
Johnson v. Division of Employment Security green moctapp · 2010 1 sentence 2022As a preliminary matter, a misconduct analysis is warranted because, under our standard of review, “we will uphold a decision of the Commission if the Commission clearly got the right result, but for the wrong reason.” Id. at 807 (citing Finner v. Americold Logistics, LLC, 298 S.W.3d 580, 584 (Mo. App. S.D. 2009)).	1	2022–2022
Arizona v. Evans green scotus · 1995 1 sentence 2016See, e.g., Leon, 468 U.S. at 922 (when police act under a warrant that is invalid for lack of probable cause, the exclusionary rule does not apply if the police acted "in objectively reasonable reliance" on the subsequently invalidated search warrant); Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 349-350 (1987) (exclusionary rule does not apply to warrantless administrative searches performed in good-faith reliance on a statute later declared unconstitutional); Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 , 14–15 (1995) (exclusionary rule does not apply where police reasonably rely in good faith on mistaken information i	1	2016–2016
Burke v. Rivo green mass · 1990 2 sentences 1992University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court, 136 Ariz. 579 , 667 P.2d 1294 (1983); Morris v. Frudenfeld, 135 Cal.App.3d 23 , 185 Cal.Rptr. 76 (1982); Ochs v. Borrelli, 187 Conn. 253 , 445 A.2d 883 (1982); Jones v. Malinowski, 299 Md. 257 , 473 A.2d 429 (1984); Burke v. Rivo, 406 Mass. 764 , 551 N.E.2d 1 (1990); Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic, 260 N.W.2d 169 (Minn.1977) (though Minnesota’s position is unclear, See, Russell G. 1992University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court, 136 Ariz. 579 , 667 P.2d 1294 (1983); Morris v. Frudenfeld, 135 Cal.App.3d 23 , 185 Cal.Rptr. 76 (1982); Ochs v. Borrelli, 187 Conn. 253 , 445 A.2d 883 (1982); Jones v. Malinowski, 299 Md. 257 , 473 A.2d 429 (1984); Burke v. Rivo, 406 Mass. 764 , 551 N.E.2d 1 (1990); Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic, 260 N.W.2d 169 (Minn.1977) (though Minnesota’s position is unclear, See, Russell G.	1	1992–1992
University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court green ariz · 1983 2 sentences 1992University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court, 136 Ariz. 579 , 667 P.2d 1294 (1983); Morris v. Frudenfeld, 135 Cal.App.3d 23 , 185 Cal.Rptr. 76 (1982); Ochs v. Borrelli, 187 Conn. 253 , 445 A.2d 883 (1982); Jones v. Malinowski, 299 Md. 257 , 473 A.2d 429 (1984); Burke v. Rivo, 406 Mass. 764 , 551 N.E.2d 1 (1990); Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic, 260 N.W.2d 169 (Minn.1977) (though Minnesota’s position is unclear, See, Russell G. 1992University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court, 136 Ariz. 579 , 667 P.2d 1294 (1983); Morris v. Frudenfeld, 135 Cal.App.3d 23 , 185 Cal.Rptr. 76 (1982); Ochs v. Borrelli, 187 Conn. 253 , 445 A.2d 883 (1982); Jones v. Malinowski, 299 Md. 257 , 473 A.2d 429 (1984); Burke v. Rivo, 406 Mass. 764 , 551 N.E.2d 1 (1990); Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic, 260 N.W.2d 169 (Minn.1977) (though Minnesota’s position is unclear, See, Russell G.	1	1992–1992
Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic green minn · 1977 1 sentence 1992University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court, 136 Ariz. 579 , 667 P.2d 1294 (1983); Morris v. Frudenfeld, 135 Cal.App.3d 23 , 185 Cal.Rptr. 76 (1982); Ochs v. Borrelli, 187 Conn. 253 , 445 A.2d 883 (1982); Jones v. Malinowski, 299 Md. 257 , 473 A.2d 429 (1984); Burke v. Rivo, 406 Mass. 764 , 551 N.E.2d 1 (1990); Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic, 260 N.W.2d 169 (Minn.1977) (though Minnesota’s position is unclear, See, Russell G.	1	1992–1992
Morris v. Frudenfeld green calctapp · 1982 2 sentences 1992University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court, 136 Ariz. 579 , 667 P.2d 1294 (1983); Morris v. Frudenfeld, 135 Cal.App.3d 23 , 185 Cal.Rptr. 76 (1982); Ochs v. Borrelli, 187 Conn. 253 , 445 A.2d 883 (1982); Jones v. Malinowski, 299 Md. 257 , 473 A.2d 429 (1984); Burke v. Rivo, 406 Mass. 764 , 551 N.E.2d 1 (1990); Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic, 260 N.W.2d 169 (Minn.1977) (though Minnesota’s position is unclear, See, Russell G. 1992University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court, 136 Ariz. 579 , 667 P.2d 1294 (1983); Morris v. Frudenfeld, 135 Cal.App.3d 23 , 185 Cal.Rptr. 76 (1982); Ochs v. Borrelli, 187 Conn. 253 , 445 A.2d 883 (1982); Jones v. Malinowski, 299 Md. 257 , 473 A.2d 429 (1984); Burke v. Rivo, 406 Mass. 764 , 551 N.E.2d 1 (1990); Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic, 260 N.W.2d 169 (Minn.1977) (though Minnesota’s position is unclear, See, Russell G.	1	1992–1992
Jones v. Malinowski green md · 1984 2 sentences 1992University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court, 136 Ariz. 579 , 667 P.2d 1294 (1983); Morris v. Frudenfeld, 135 Cal.App.3d 23 , 185 Cal.Rptr. 76 (1982); Ochs v. Borrelli, 187 Conn. 253 , 445 A.2d 883 (1982); Jones v. Malinowski, 299 Md. 257 , 473 A.2d 429 (1984); Burke v. Rivo, 406 Mass. 764 , 551 N.E.2d 1 (1990); Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic, 260 N.W.2d 169 (Minn.1977) (though Minnesota’s position is unclear, See, Russell G. 1992University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court, 136 Ariz. 579 , 667 P.2d 1294 (1983); Morris v. Frudenfeld, 135 Cal.App.3d 23 , 185 Cal.Rptr. 76 (1982); Ochs v. Borrelli, 187 Conn. 253 , 445 A.2d 883 (1982); Jones v. Malinowski, 299 Md. 257 , 473 A.2d 429 (1984); Burke v. Rivo, 406 Mass. 764 , 551 N.E.2d 1 (1990); Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic, 260 N.W.2d 169 (Minn.1977) (though Minnesota’s position is unclear, See, Russell G.	1	1992–1992
Ochs v. Borrelli green conn · 1982 2 sentences 1992University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court, 136 Ariz. 579 , 667 P.2d 1294 (1983); Morris v. Frudenfeld, 135 Cal.App.3d 23 , 185 Cal.Rptr. 76 (1982); Ochs v. Borrelli, 187 Conn. 253 , 445 A.2d 883 (1982); Jones v. Malinowski, 299 Md. 257 , 473 A.2d 429 (1984); Burke v. Rivo, 406 Mass. 764 , 551 N.E.2d 1 (1990); Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic, 260 N.W.2d 169 (Minn.1977) (though Minnesota’s position is unclear, See, Russell G. 1992University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court, 136 Ariz. 579 , 667 P.2d 1294 (1983); Morris v. Frudenfeld, 135 Cal.App.3d 23 , 185 Cal.Rptr. 76 (1982); Ochs v. Borrelli, 187 Conn. 253 , 445 A.2d 883 (1982); Jones v. Malinowski, 299 Md. 257 , 473 A.2d 429 (1984); Burke v. Rivo, 406 Mass. 764 , 551 N.E.2d 1 (1990); Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic, 260 N.W.2d 169 (Minn.1977) (though Minnesota’s position is unclear, See, Russell G.	1	1992–1992

Where else courts name it

CA 46 (1938–2026) TX 45 (1913–2025) FL 20 (1966–2025) WA 20 (1972–2026) NY 20 (1886–2025) VT 17 (1999–2026) IL 13 (1975–2013) CT 13 (1992–2019) MO 12 (1976–2023) CO 11 (1899–2023) NJ 11 (1961–2025) LA 10 (1978–2015) IN 10 (1972–2003) MS 10 (1998–2022) VA 9 (1993–2025) IA 8 (1928–2019) GA 8 (1931–2014) WI 8 (1933–2020) PA 7 (1982–2009) AL 7 (1980–2007) NM 7 (1942–2023) OH 7 (1989–2013) MA 6 (1973–2016) MT 6 (1938–2014) MD 5 (1990–2019) AZ 5 (1976–1993) DC 4 (1969–2017) SD 4 (1911–2006) WY 4 (1980–2014) WV 4 (1952–2021) MN 4 (1986–1990) KY 4 (1923–2026) MI 4 (1989–2022) NC 4 (1960–2000) OR 4 (1946–2020) OK 3 (1932–1995) NE 3 (1942–2018) ID 3 (1996–2020) ME 3 (1980–2009) UT 3 (1988–2013) ND 2 (1898–1990) NH 2 (1978–2002) AK 2 (1989–1990)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check