Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1933–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc, and United Steelworkers of America, Local Union 15271 v. Danly MacHine Corporationgreen2 sentences1994Corp., 852 F.2d 1024, 1026 (7th Cir. 1988), the arbitrator ordered the employer "to pay grievant [sickness and accident] benefits in accordance with the above opinion." The employee, however, was unable to complete a benefits claim form because he was not under a treating physician's care. 1994Corp., 852 F.2d 1024, 1026 (7th Cir. 1988), the arbitrator ordered the employer "to pay grievant [sickness and accident] benefits in accordance with the above opinion." The employee, however, was unable to complete a benefits claim form because he was not under a treating physician's care. | 2 | 2 |
Warehouse II, LLC v. State Department of Transportationgreen1 sentence2020See Warehouse II, 291 Wis. 2d 80, ¶4 . ¶9 The castle doctrine, codified by WIS. | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Bensongreen2 sentences2009Jackson, 218 Wis.2d at 875 , 578 N.W.2d 602 . ¶ 122 Again, if it is unconstitutional for a court to adjudicate a claim for discrimination by a lay teacher against a Catholic school, as the majority holds here, surely the amended MPCP's provision requiring participating schools to comply with nondiscrimination laws must then also be unconstitutional. ¶ 123 Likewise, the majority's decision endangers our holding in Jackson v. Benson under the benefits clause in Article I, Section 18 of the Wisconsin Constitution. 2009Jackson, 218 Wis.2d at 875 , 578 N.W.2d 602 . ¶ 122 Again, if it is unconstitutional for a court to adjudicate a claim for discrimination by a lay teacher against a Catholic school, as the majority holds here, surely the amended MPCP's provision requiring participating schools to comply with nondiscrimination laws must then also be unconstitutional. ¶ 123 Likewise, the majority's decision endangers our holding in Jackson v. Benson under the benefits clause in Article I, Section 18 of the Wisconsin Constitution. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State ex rel. Weiss v. District Board of School District No. Eight
green
2 sentences2009Bd., 76 Wis. 177 , 44 N.W. 967 (1890) (public funds may not be used to fund a school that requires students to read from the Bible). ¶ 124 Thus, just as with the above analysis under the second prong of the Lemon test, the majority's characterization of facts that religion is central to every part of CCS's curriculum, see, e.g., majority op., ¶¶ 5, 72, 73, 75-77, and, by extension, any other Catholic or otherwise religious school, likewise jeopardizes our holding in Jackson v. Benson that the amended MPCP does not violate the benefits clause in Article I, Section 18. ¶ 125 Finally, the majorit 2009Bd., 76 Wis. 177 , 44 N.W. 967 (1890) (public funds may not be used to fund a school that requires students to read from the Bible). ¶ 124 Thus, just as with the above analysis under the second prong of the Lemon test, the majority's characterization of facts that religion is central to every part of CCS's curriculum, see, e.g., majority op., ¶¶ 5, 72, 73, 75-77, and, by extension, any other Catholic or otherwise religious school, likewise jeopardizes our holding in Jackson v. Benson that the amended MPCP does not violate the benefits clause in Article I, Section 18. ¶ 125 Finally, the majorit | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Geis v. Hirth
green
2 sentences1975Geis v. Hirth (1966), 32 Wis. 2d 580, 586 , 146 N. W. 2d 459 ; Gage v. Seal (1967), 36 Wis. 2d 661 , 154 N. W. 2d 354 , 155 N. W. 2d 557 . 1975Geis v. Hirth (1966), 32 Wis. 2d 580, 586 , 146 N. W. 2d 459 ; Gage v. Seal (1967), 36 Wis. 2d 661 , 154 N. W. 2d 354 , 155 N. W. 2d 557 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Gage v. Seal
green
2 sentences1975Geis v. Hirth (1966), 32 Wis. 2d 580, 586 , 146 N. W. 2d 459 ; Gage v. Seal (1967), 36 Wis. 2d 661 , 154 N. W. 2d 354 , 155 N. W. 2d 557 . 1975Geis v. Hirth (1966), 32 Wis. 2d 580, 586 , 146 N. W. 2d 459 ; Gage v. Seal (1967), 36 Wis. 2d 661 , 154 N. W. 2d 354 , 155 N. W. 2d 557 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
green
1 sentence1969Atchison, Topeka & S. F. Ry. v. Public Utilities Comm. (1953), 346 U. S. 346 , 74 Sup. Ct. 92, 98 L. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Ryan v. Zweck-Wollenberg Co.
green
2 sentences1963The three elements of res ipsa loquitur, as defined in Ryan v. Zweck-Wollenberg Co. (1954), 266 Wis. 630 , 64 N. W. (2d) 226 , that must be present before the application of the doctrine, are: (1) The accident must be of a kind which ordinarily does not occur in the absence of someone’s negligence; (2) it must be caused by an agency or instrumentality within the exclusive control of the defendant; (3) it must not have been due to any voluntary action or contribution on the part of the plaintiff. 1963The three elements of res ipsa loquitur, as defined in Ryan v. Zweck-Wollenberg Co. (1954), 266 Wis. 630 , 64 N. W. (2d) 226 , that must be present before the application of the doctrine, are: (1) The accident must be of a kind which ordinarily does not occur in the absence of someone’s negligence; (2) it must be caused by an agency or instrumentality within the exclusive control of the defendant; (3) it must not have been due to any voluntary action or contribution on the part of the plaintiff. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Stahl v. Broeckert
neutral
2 sentences1933This being true, the granting of this order constituted error under the doctrine of Stahl v. Broeckert, 167 Wis. 113 , 166 N. W. 653 . 1933This being true, the granting of this order constituted error under the doctrine of Stahl v. Broeckert, 167 Wis. 113 , 166 N. W. 653 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.