benefits rule (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

benefits rule in Louisiana

10 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Fassoulas v. Rameygreen
fla · 1984 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
1 sentence

1987See Fassoulas v. Ramey, 450 So.2d 822 (Fla.1984).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

CaseCitedYears
Olivier v. Best Workover, Inc. neutral
lactapp · 1996
1 sentence

2015See: Id.

12015–2015
Larche v. Rodriguez green
la · 2000
2 sentences

2010Thus, the appellate court saw "no reason to deny Dr. Rodriguez the benefits of the presumption." Id. at 389 .

2010Thus, the appellate court saw “no reason to deny Dr. Rodriguez the benefits of the presumption.” Id. at 389 .

12010–2010
United States v. Leon green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2007United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 907-908 , 104 S.Ct. 3412 -3413, 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984). [4] As the majority notes, guns and drugs frequently go hand-in-hand.

2007United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 907-908 , 104 S.Ct. 3412 -3413, 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984). [4] As the majority notes, guns and drugs frequently go hand-in-hand.

12007–2007
Jimmy Allen v. Texaco, Inc., North-West Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant green
ca5 · 1975
1 sentence

1996See: Id.

11996–1996
Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections green
la · 1979
1 sentence

1988Corsey, supra. It seems clear to us that Fred knew of the events giving rise to a cause of action against his father and knew it was wrong to engage in such activities.

11988–1988
Delta Steamships Lines, Inc. v. Thomas J. Albano and David Lytle, D/B/A Container Repair Services green
ca5 · 1985
1 sentence

1987Appellees and the majority cite Delta Steamship Line, Inc. v. Albano, 768 F.2d 728 (5th Cir.1985) for the proposition that the precise method of service by mail must be followed; specifically, that the defendant’s return and acknowledgment are an essential part of the procedure and must be fully satisfied if the benefits of the rule are claimed.

11987–1987
Hawthorne Oil & Gas Corp. v. Continental Oil Co. green
la · 1979
1 sentence

1984Hawthorne Oil & Gas Corp. v. Continental Oil, 377 So.2d 285 (La.1979).

11984–1984
Perrodin v. Clement neutral
lactapp · 1972
1 sentence

1979Perrodin v. Clement, 254 So.2d 704 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1971).

11979–1979
McElwee v. McElwee green
la · 1972
1 sentence

1979Thus, a person whose ignorance of his cause of action or inability to assert it is the result of his own mental incapacity cannot claim the benefits of this rule unless he has been interdicted. [11] Israel v. Smith, 302 So.2d 392 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 303 So.2d 183 (La.1974); [12] Buvens v. Buvens, 286 So.2d 144 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1973), Lassere v. Lassere, 255 So.2d 794 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 257 So.2d 434 (La.1972).

11979–1979
Buvens v. Buvens neutral
lactapp · 1973
1 sentence

1979Thus, a person whose ignorance of his cause of action or inability to assert it is the result of his own mental incapacity cannot claim the benefits of this rule unless he has been interdicted. [11] Israel v. Smith, 302 So.2d 392 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 303 So.2d 183 (La.1974); [12] Buvens v. Buvens, 286 So.2d 144 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1973), Lassere v. Lassere, 255 So.2d 794 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 257 So.2d 434 (La.1972).

11979–1979
Israel v. Smith green
lactapp · 1974
1 sentence

1979Thus, a person whose ignorance of his cause of action or inability to assert it is the result of his own mental incapacity cannot claim the benefits of this rule unless he has been interdicted. [11] Israel v. Smith, 302 So.2d 392 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 303 So.2d 183 (La.1974); [12] Buvens v. Buvens, 286 So.2d 144 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1973), Lassere v. Lassere, 255 So.2d 794 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 257 So.2d 434 (La.1972).

11979–1979
Lassere v. Lassere neutral
lactapp · 1971
1 sentence

1979Thus, a person whose ignorance of his cause of action or inability to assert it is the result of his own mental incapacity cannot claim the benefits of this rule unless he has been interdicted. [11] Israel v. Smith, 302 So.2d 392 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 303 So.2d 183 (La.1974); [12] Buvens v. Buvens, 286 So.2d 144 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1973), Lassere v. Lassere, 255 So.2d 794 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 257 So.2d 434 (La.1972).

11979–1979
Israel v. Smith neutral
la · 1974
1 sentence

1979Thus, a person whose ignorance of his cause of action or inability to assert it is the result of his own mental incapacity cannot claim the benefits of this rule unless he has been interdicted. [11] Israel v. Smith, 302 So.2d 392 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 303 So.2d 183 (La.1974); [12] Buvens v. Buvens, 286 So.2d 144 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1973), Lassere v. Lassere, 255 So.2d 794 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 257 So.2d 434 (La.1972).

11979–1979
Boyle v. Mann neutral
la · 1849
1 sentence

1978Martin v. Jennings, 10 La.Ann. 553 (1855); and Boyle v. Mann, 4 La.Ann. 170 (1849). * * *" (footnote omitted) Cases subsequent to Hyman stress the need for some concealment or misleading *1222 action as a requirement for plaintiff to avail himself of the benefits of the doctrine.

11978–1978
Martin v. Jennings neutral
la · 1855
1 sentence

1978Martin v. Jennings, 10 La.Ann. 553 (1855); and Boyle v. Mann, 4 La.Ann. 170 (1849). * * *" (footnote omitted) Cases subsequent to Hyman stress the need for some concealment or misleading *1222 action as a requirement for plaintiff to avail himself of the benefits of the doctrine.

11978–1978

Where else courts name it

CA 46 (1938–2026) TX 45 (1913–2025) FL 20 (1966–2025) WA 20 (1972–2026) NY 20 (1886–2025) VT 17 (1999–2026) IL 13 (1975–2013) CT 13 (1992–2019) MO 12 (1976–2023) CO 11 (1899–2023) NJ 11 (1961–2025) LA 10 (1978–2015) IN 10 (1972–2003) MS 10 (1998–2022) VA 9 (1993–2025) IA 8 (1928–2019) GA 8 (1931–2014) WI 8 (1933–2020) PA 7 (1982–2009) AL 7 (1980–2007) NM 7 (1942–2023) OH 7 (1989–2013) MA 6 (1973–2016) MT 6 (1938–2014) MD 5 (1990–2019) AZ 5 (1976–1993) DC 4 (1969–2017) SD 4 (1911–2006) WY 4 (1980–2014) WV 4 (1952–2021) MN 4 (1986–1990) KY 4 (1923–2026) MI 4 (1989–2022) NC 4 (1960–2000) OR 4 (1946–2020) OK 3 (1932–1995) NE 3 (1942–2018) ID 3 (1996–2020) ME 3 (1980–2009) UT 3 (1988–2013) ND 2 (1898–1990) NH 2 (1978–2002) AK 2 (1989–1990)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check