Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1931–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wiles v. Wilesgreen2 sentences2014See Wiles v. Wiles, supra, 4 264 Ga. at 595 . 2014See Wiles v. Wiles, supra, 264 Ga. at 595 . | 2 | 2 |
Binns v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authoritygreen2 sentences1990"The question of the insurer's good faith (or lack thereof) is one *659 of fact for the jury, and the jury's determination on this issue should be upheld on appeal if there is any evidence to support it. [Cits.] A jury award of punitive damages for wrongful refusal to pay a claim is thus entitled to great weight on appeal and should be disturbed only if the evidence at trial does not support an inference of bad faith on the insurer's part. [Cits.] Application of an `any evidence' standard of review to § 33-34-6... jury awards is consistent with the policy, previously recognized by this court, 1990"The question of the insurer's good faith (or lack thereof) is one *659 of fact for the jury, and the jury's determination on this issue should be upheld on appeal if there is any evidence to support it. [Cits.] A jury award of punitive damages for wrongful refusal to pay a claim is thus entitled to great weight on appeal and should be disturbed only if the evidence at trial does not support an inference of bad faith on the insurer's part. [Cits.] Application of an `any evidence' standard of review to § 33-34-6... jury awards is consistent with the policy, previously recognized by this court, | 1 | 1 |
White v. Stategreen2 sentences1980In Sims v. State, 234 Ga. 177 (2) ( 214 SE2d 902 ) (1975), this court held (at 179): "The benefits of this rule are not deemed waived by defendant even where his counsel states to the trial judge that he has no objection to the charge of the court." Sims v. State, supra, was overruled in White v. State, 243 Ga. 250, 251 ( 253 SE2d 694 ) (1979), with Justices Jordan and Hill dissenting. 1980In Sims v. State, 234 Ga. 177 (2) ( 214 SE2d 902 ) (1975), this court held (at 179): "The benefits of this rule are not deemed waived by defendant even where his counsel states to the trial judge that he has no objection to the charge of the court." Sims v. State, supra, was overruled in White v. State, 243 Ga. 250, 251 ( 253 SE2d 694 ) (1979), with Justices Jordan and Hill dissenting. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sims v. State
green
2 sentences1980In Sims v. State, 234 Ga. 177 (2) ( 214 SE2d 902 ) (1975), this court held (at 179): "The benefits of this rule are not deemed waived by defendant even where his counsel states to the trial judge that he has no objection to the charge of the court." Sims v. State, supra, was overruled in White v. State, 243 Ga. 250, 251 ( 253 SE2d 694 ) (1979), with Justices Jordan and Hill dissenting. 1980In Sims v. State, 234 Ga. 177 (2) ( 214 SE2d 902 ) (1975), this court held (at 179): "The benefits of this rule are not deemed waived by defendant even where his counsel states to the trial judge that he has no objection to the charge of the court." Sims v. State, supra, was overruled in White v. State, 243 Ga. 250, 251 ( 253 SE2d 694 ) (1979), with Justices Jordan and Hill dissenting. | 2 | 1975–1980 |
City of Norcross v. Georgia Power Co.
green
1 sentence2001The court reasoned that the master metering arrangement was a "means to technically confer the benefits of the exception upon a premises that would not otherwise be within the contemplation of the legislature." Id. at 894, 399 S.E.2d 725 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Kirk v. Lithonia Mobile Homes, Inc.
green
1 sentence1990Considering the type of development and the arrangement for electrical services ?z a whole, and giving the terms of the statute their “ordinary, logical, and common” meaning (Kirk, supra at Division 2), we do not feel that this is the type of large load consumer meant to receive the benefits of the exception to competitive restriction inherent in the Act. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Williams v. Brewton
green
2 sentences1931Williams had no such lien in this case, legal or equitable, as to bring him within the benefits of the rule and principle stated in the case of Williams v. Brewton, 170 Ga. 164 ( 152 S. E. 441 ). 1931Williams had no such lien in this case, legal or equitable, as to bring him within the benefits of the rule and principle stated in the case of Williams v. Brewton, 170 Ga. 164 ( 152 S. E. 441 ). | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.