written notice claim in North Carolina

12 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1916–2024 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Smithgreen nc · 1985 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 2 sentences 2020See id. at 92 , 337 S.E.2d at 844 (“Should the trial judge determine that notice was not given, was inadequate, or was untimely provided, his inquiry must cease and the proffered hearsay statement must be denied admission under Rule 803(24).”). 2020See id. at 92 , 337 S.E.2d at 844 (“Should the trial judge determine that notice was not given, was inadequate, or was untimely provided, his inquiry must cease and the proffered hearsay statement must be denied admission under Rule 803(24).”).	2	2
Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.green nc · 2004 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 1 sentence 2024Rather, we construe statutes in pari materia, giving effect, if possible, to every provision.” Rhyne v. K- Mart Corp., 358 N.C. 160, 188 (2004).	1	1
Home Health & Hospice Care, Inc. v. Meyergreen ncctapp · 1987 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991 1 sentence 1991See Home Health and Hospice Care v. Meyer, 88 N.C.	1	1
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Frazellegreen nc · 1946 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982 2 sentences 1982See Hayes v. Ricard, 244 N.C. 313, 324 , 93 S.E. 2d 540, 549 (1956); First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Frazelle, supra, 226 N.C. at 728 , 40 S.E. 2d at 370 (1945); Redevelopment Comm. of Greenville v. Hannaford, 29 N.C. 1982See Hayes v. Ricard, 244 N.C. 313, 324 , 93 S.E. 2d 540, 549 (1956); First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Frazelle, supra, 226 N.C. at 728 , 40 S.E. 2d at 370 (1945); Redevelopment Comm. of Greenville v. Hannaford, 29 N.C.	1	1
Hayes v. Ricardgreen nc · 1956 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982 2 sentences 1982See Hayes v. Ricard, 244 N.C. 313, 324 , 93 S.E. 2d 540, 549 (1956); First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Frazelle, supra, 226 N.C. at 728 , 40 S.E. 2d at 370 (1945); Redevelopment Comm. of Greenville v. Hannaford, 29 N.C. 1982See Hayes v. Ricard, 244 N.C. 313, 324 , 93 S.E. 2d 540, 549 (1956); First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Frazelle, supra, 226 N.C. at 728 , 40 S.E. 2d at 370 (1945); Redevelopment Comm. of Greenville v. Hannaford, 29 N.C.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Smith green ncctapp · 1998 2 sentences 2022Accordingly, the Court of Appeals concluded that “the [MAR] court abused its discretion when it concluded the written notice requirement had been satisfied.” Id. ¶ 18 Finally, the Court of Appeals held that the MAR court erred in concluding that Reid’s “due process rights would be violated if he were not allowed to present McCormick’s testimony at a new trial.” Id. 2022Accordingly, the Court of Appeals concluded that “the [MAR] court abused its discretion when it concluded the written notice requirement had been satisfied.” Id. ¶ 18 Finally, the Court of Appeals held that the MAR court erred in concluding that Reid’s “due process rights would be violated if he were not allowed to present McCormick’s testimony at a new trial.” Id.	2	2022–2022
Baldwin v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad neutral nc · 1915 2 sentences 1916R. , 170 N.C. 12 , and in two other cases (352) the opinion in one of which was written by Associate Justice Walker and the other by Associate Justice Hoke , and in all the same conclusion was reached. 1916R., 170 N. C., 12 , and in two other cases the opin ion in one of wbicb was written by Associate Justice Walker and the other by Associate Justice Hoke, and in all the same conclusion was reached.	2	1916–1916
State v. Crook green ncctapp · 2016 1 sentence 2023State v. Crook, 247 N.C.	1	2023–2023
State v. Reekes neutral ncctapp · 1982 2 sentences 1992We are aware that our Court of Appeals in State v. Reekes, 59 N.C.App. 672 , 297 S.E.2d 763 , disc. rev. denied, 307 N.C. 472 , 298 S.E.2d 693 (1982), has implied that placing a case on the trial calendar subsequent to a dismissal with leave is sufficient to meet the written notice requirement for reinstatement of an indictment under N.C.G.S. § 15A-932. 1992We are aware that our Court of Appeals in State v. Reekes, 59 N.C.App. 672 , 297 S.E.2d 763 , disc. rev. denied, 307 N.C. 472 , 298 S.E.2d 693 (1982), has implied that placing a case on the trial calendar subsequent to a dismissal with leave is sufficient to meet the written notice requirement for reinstatement of an indictment under N.C.G.S. § 15A-932.	1	1992–1992
State v. Norton neutral nc · 1983 2 sentences 1992App. 672 , 297 S.E.2d 763 , disc. rev. denied, 307 N.C. 472 , 298 S.E.2d 693 (1982), has implied that placing a case on the trial calendar subsequent to a dismissal with leave is sufficient to meet the written notice requirement for reinstatement of an indictment under N.C.G.S. § 15A-932. 1992We are aware that our Court of Appeals in State v. Reekes, 59 N.C.App. 672 , 297 S.E.2d 763 , disc. rev. denied, 307 N.C. 472 , 298 S.E.2d 693 (1982), has implied that placing a case on the trial calendar subsequent to a dismissal with leave is sufficient to meet the written notice requirement for reinstatement of an indictment under N.C.G.S. § 15A-932.	1	1992–1992
State v. King neutral nc · 1982 2 sentences 1992App. 672 , 297 S.E.2d 763 , disc. rev. denied, 307 N.C. 472 , 298 S.E.2d 693 (1982), has implied that placing a case on the trial calendar subsequent to a dismissal with leave is sufficient to meet the written notice requirement for reinstatement of an indictment under N.C.G.S. § 15A-932. 1992We are aware that our Court of Appeals in State v. Reekes, 59 N.C.App. 672 , 297 S.E.2d 763 , disc. rev. denied, 307 N.C. 472 , 298 S.E.2d 693 (1982), has implied that placing a case on the trial calendar subsequent to a dismissal with leave is sufficient to meet the written notice requirement for reinstatement of an indictment under N.C.G.S. § 15A-932.	1	1992–1992
Redevelopment Com'n of Greenville v. Hannaford green ncctapp · 1976 1 sentence 1982See Hayes v. Ricard, 244 N.C. 313, 324 , 93 S.E. 2d 540, 549 (1956); First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Frazelle, supra, 226 N.C. at 728 , 40 S.E. 2d at 370 (1945); Redevelopment Comm. of Greenville v. Hannaford, 29 N.C.	1	1982–1982
Dayton v. . Asheville green nc · 1923 2 sentences 1973In my opinion, this question should be answered, "No." The majority opinion cites in support of its conclusion the following cases: Sowers v. Warehouse, 256 N.C. 190 , 123 S.E.2d 603 ; Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328 , 106 S.E.2d 564 ; Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E.2d 900 ; Foster v. Charlotte, 206 N.C. 528 , 174 S.E. 412 ; Dayton v. Asheville, 185 N.C. 12 , 115 S.E. 827 ; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N.C. 363 , 76 S.E. 228 . 1973In my opinion, this question should be answered, "No." The majority opinion cites in support of its conclusion the following cases: Sowers v. Warehouse, 256 N.C. 190 , 123 S.E.2d 603 ; Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328 , 106 S.E.2d 564 ; Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E.2d 900 ; Foster v. Charlotte, 206 N.C. 528 , 174 S.E. 412 ; Dayton v. Asheville, 185 N.C. 12 , 115 S.E. 827 ; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N.C. 363 , 76 S.E. 228 .	1	1973–1973
Webster v. City of Charlotte green nc · 1942 2 sentences 1973In my opinion, this question should be answered, "No." The majority opinion cites in support of its conclusion the following cases: Sowers v. Warehouse, 256 N.C. 190 , 123 S.E.2d 603 ; Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328 , 106 S.E.2d 564 ; Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E.2d 900 ; Foster v. Charlotte, 206 N.C. 528 , 174 S.E. 412 ; Dayton v. Asheville, 185 N.C. 12 , 115 S.E. 827 ; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N.C. 363 , 76 S.E. 228 . 1973In my opinion, this question should be answered, "No." The majority opinion cites in support of its conclusion the following cases: Sowers v. Warehouse, 256 N.C. 190 , 123 S.E.2d 603 ; Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328 , 106 S.E.2d 564 ; Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E.2d 900 ; Foster v. Charlotte, 206 N.C. 528 , 174 S.E. 412 ; Dayton v. Asheville, 185 N.C. 12 , 115 S.E. 827 ; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N.C. 363 , 76 S.E. 228 .	1	1973–1973
Pender v. City of Salisbury green nc · 1912 2 sentences 1973In my opinion, this question should be answered, "No." The majority opinion cites in support of its conclusion the following cases: Sowers v. Warehouse, 256 N.C. 190 , 123 S.E.2d 603 ; Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328 , 106 S.E.2d 564 ; Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E.2d 900 ; Foster v. Charlotte, 206 N.C. 528 , 174 S.E. 412 ; Dayton v. Asheville, 185 N.C. 12 , 115 S.E. 827 ; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N.C. 363 , 76 S.E. 228 . 1973In my opinion, this question should be answered, "No." The majority opinion cites in support of its conclusion the following cases: Sowers v. Warehouse, 256 N.C. 190 , 123 S.E.2d 603 ; Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328 , 106 S.E.2d 564 ; Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E.2d 900 ; Foster v. Charlotte, 206 N.C. 528 , 174 S.E. 412 ; Dayton v. Asheville, 185 N.C. 12 , 115 S.E. 827 ; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N.C. 363 , 76 S.E. 228 .	1	1973–1973
Sowers Ex Rel. Sowers v. Forsyth Warehouse Co. neutral nc · 1962 2 sentences 1973In my opinion, this question should be answered, "No." The majority opinion cites in support of its conclusion the following cases: Sowers v. Warehouse, 256 N.C. 190 , 123 S.E.2d 603 ; Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328 , 106 S.E.2d 564 ; Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E.2d 900 ; Foster v. Charlotte, 206 N.C. 528 , 174 S.E. 412 ; Dayton v. Asheville, 185 N.C. 12 , 115 S.E. 827 ; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N.C. 363 , 76 S.E. 228 . 1973In my opinion, this question should be answered, "No." The majority opinion cites in support of its conclusion the following cases: Sowers v. Warehouse, 256 N.C. 190 , 123 S.E.2d 603 ; Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328 , 106 S.E.2d 564 ; Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E.2d 900 ; Foster v. Charlotte, 206 N.C. 528 , 174 S.E. 412 ; Dayton v. Asheville, 185 N.C. 12 , 115 S.E. 827 ; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N.C. 363 , 76 S.E. 228 .	1	1973–1973
Carter Ex Rel. Clap v. City of Greensboro green nc · 1959 2 sentences 1973In my opinion, this question should be answered, "No." The majority opinion cites in support of its conclusion the following cases: Sowers v. Warehouse, 256 N.C. 190 , 123 S.E.2d 603 ; Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328 , 106 S.E.2d 564 ; Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E.2d 900 ; Foster v. Charlotte, 206 N.C. 528 , 174 S.E. 412 ; Dayton v. Asheville, 185 N.C. 12 , 115 S.E. 827 ; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N.C. 363 , 76 S.E. 228 . 1973In my opinion, this question should be answered, "No." The majority opinion cites in support of its conclusion the following cases: Sowers v. Warehouse, 256 N.C. 190 , 123 S.E.2d 603 ; Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328 , 106 S.E.2d 564 ; Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E.2d 900 ; Foster v. Charlotte, 206 N.C. 528 , 174 S.E. 412 ; Dayton v. Asheville, 185 N.C. 12 , 115 S.E. 827 ; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N.C. 363 , 76 S.E. 228 .	1	1973–1973
Foster v. City of Charlotte neutral nc · 1934 2 sentences 1973In my opinion, this question should be answered, "No." The majority opinion cites in support of its conclusion the following cases: Sowers v. Warehouse, 256 N.C. 190 , 123 S.E.2d 603 ; Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328 , 106 S.E.2d 564 ; Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E.2d 900 ; Foster v. Charlotte, 206 N.C. 528 , 174 S.E. 412 ; Dayton v. Asheville, 185 N.C. 12 , 115 S.E. 827 ; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N.C. 363 , 76 S.E. 228 . 1973In my opinion, this question should be answered, "No." The majority opinion cites in support of its conclusion the following cases: Sowers v. Warehouse, 256 N.C. 190 , 123 S.E.2d 603 ; Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328 , 106 S.E.2d 564 ; Webster v. Charlotte, 222 N.C. 321 , 22 S.E.2d 900 ; Foster v. Charlotte, 206 N.C. 528 , 174 S.E. 412 ; Dayton v. Asheville, 185 N.C. 12 , 115 S.E. 827 ; Pender v. Salisbury, 160 N.C. 363 , 76 S.E. 228 .	1	1973–1973

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8C-1 (5) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1415 (4) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1420 (4) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-801 (4) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-803 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 525 (1860–2026) CT 41 (1930–2024) TX 40 (1949–2024) AL 32 (1980–2024) IL 29 (1910–2025) FL 24 (1966–2018) OK 21 (1909–2022) PA 16 (1980–2025) GA 14 (1921–2022) NC 12 (1916–2024) HI 11 (1973–2023) ND 11 (1980–2009) MD 11 (1946–2007) MA 11 (1947–2025) MN 11 (1915–2016) CA 11 (1964–2024) UT 10 (1983–2024) OH 10 (1991–2025) TN 9 (1986–2021) VA 9 (1976–2016) SD 7 (1995–2018) MO 7 (1913–2022) NM 7 (1980–2019) LA 7 (1934–2021) MI 6 (1974–2025) CO 6 (1942–2015) KS 6 (1899–2014) ME 6 (1924–2013) NJ 6 (1962–2020) MS 5 (1996–2012) DC 5 (1979–2008) IA 5 (1916–2025) IN 5 (1982–2016) SC 5 (2001–2025) RI 4 (1999–2012) WI 4 (1981–2021) NE 4 (1989–2006) VT 3 (1986–2015) AR 3 (2011–2025) NV 3 (1975–2013) AK 2 (1984–1997) WA 2 (1995–1998) KY 2 (2020–2021) MT 2 (1975–1977)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check