Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
29 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1910–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Fostergreen2 sentences2002See Foster, 171 Ill. 2d at 473 (holding that, where a trial court has failed to issue Rule 605(b) admonitions, the appellate court may entertain an appeal from a sentence despite defendant’s noncompliance with the written-notice requirement of Rule 604(d)). 2002See Foster, 171 Ill. 2d at 473 (holding that, where a trial court has failed to issue Rule 605(b) admonitions, the appellate court may entertain an appeal from a sentence despite defendant's noncompliance with the written-notice requirement of Rule 604(d)). | 2 | 2 |
Federated Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurancegreen2 sentences2009In both situations, the insurer “requires an insured to jump through meaningless hoops towards an absurd end: telling the insurer something it already knows.” Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 282 Ill. 2009In both situations, the insurer "requires an insured to jump through meaningless hoops toward an absurd end: telling the insurer something it already knows." See Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 282 Ill.App.3d 716, 725 , 218 Ill.Dec. 143 , 668 N.E.2d at 627, 632-33 (1996). | 1 | 2 |
PROFESSIONAL EXEC. CTR. v. LaSalle Nat. Bankgreen1 sentence2025Id. at 379. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Alaka W.green1 sentence2022To comply with section 2-107.1’s requirements, the State had to provide evidence of the benefits and harms of each of the proposed drugs (In re Alaka W., 379 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Fischetti v. Village of Schaumburggreen1 sentence2014See Fischetti v. Village of Schaumburg, 2012 IL App (1st) 111008, ¶ 10 (finding that the village of Schaumburg’s administrative adjudication of the plaintiff’s red light violation was authorized by both the state and the municipality); Amalgamated Transit Worker’s Union, Local 241 v. Pace Suburban Bus Division, 407 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Amalgamated Transit Worker's Union v. Pace Suburban Bus Divisiongreen1 sentence2014See Fischetti v. Village of Schaumburg, 2012 IL App (1st) 111008, ¶ 10 (finding that the village of Schaumburg’s administrative adjudication of the plaintiff’s red light violation was authorized by both the state and the municipality); Amalgamated Transit Worker’s Union, Local 241 v. Pace Suburban Bus Division, 407 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In the Matter of Steven P.
neutral
2 sentences2011Concededly, the supreme court reversed this court on the written-notice requirement in In re Steven P., 207 Ill.2d 604 , 280 Ill.Dec. 2 , 801 N.E.2d 947 (2004) (nonprecedential supervisory order), in a terse supervisory order. 2011Concededly, the supreme court reversed this court on the written-notice requirement in In re Steven P., 207 Ill.2d 604 , 280 Ill.Dec. 2 , 801 N.E.2d 947 (2004) (nonprecedential supervisory order), in a terse supervisory order. | 4 | 2007–2011 |
People v. Linda K.
green
2 sentences2022It may not be waived (Tiffany W., 2012 IL App (1st) 102492-B, ¶ 14 ) or satisfied by anything less than complete written notice of all the information listed in the statute, including alternatives to medication (Wilma T., 2018 IL App (3d) 170155, ¶ 23 ; Linda K., 407 Ill. 2022It may not be waived (Tiffany W., 2012 IL App (1st) 102492-B, ¶ 14 ) or satisfied by anything less than complete written notice of all the information listed in the statute, including alternatives to medication (Wilma T., 2018 IL App (3d) 170155, ¶ 23 ; Linda K., 407 Ill. | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Wilma T. (In Re Wilma T.)
green
2 sentences2022Wilma T., 2018 IL App (3d) 170155, ¶ 23 ; Tiffany W., 2012 IL App (1st) 102492-B, ¶ 22 . 2 The Code’s written notice requirement demands strict compliance. 2022It may not be waived (Tiffany W., 2012 IL App (1st) 102492-B, ¶ 14 ) or satisfied by anything less than complete written notice of all the information listed in the statute, including alternatives to medication (Wilma T., 2018 IL App (3d) 170155, ¶ 23 ; Linda K., 407 Ill. | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc.
green
2 sentences2004Rice , 294 Ill. 2004Rice, 294 Ill. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
People v. Porter
green
2 sentences2003Porter , 122 Ill. 2d at 82 ; Price , 144 Ill. 2003Porter, 122 Ill. 2d at 82 ; Price, 144 Ill. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
People v. Price
green
2 sentences2003Porter , 122 Ill. 2d at 82 ; Price , 144 Ill. 2003Porter, 122 Ill. 2d at 82 ; Price, 144 Ill. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Peterson v. United States Building Maintenance Co.
neutral
2 sentences2001Peterson v. United States Building Maintenance Co. , 96 Ill. 2001Peterson v. United States Building Maintenance Co., 96 Ill. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Plambeck v. Greystone Management & Columbia National Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1997Plambeck , 281 Ill. 1997Plambeck, 281 Ill. | 2 | 1997–1997 |
People v. Montalvo
green
1 sentence2020“Because the [Code] has the force and effect of law, the rules of statutory construction apply to interpreting its provisions. [Citation.] Accordingly, the primary aim is to give effect to the drafters’ intent. [Citation.] The best indicator of that intent is the language of the provision, which is given its plain and ordinary meaning. [Citation.] An interpretation of the [Code] is reviewed de novo. [Citation.]” People v. Montalvo, 2016 IL App (2d) 140905, ¶ 18 . ¶ 109 Here the terms of IDOC Rule 120.40 are clear and unambiguous and plaintiff makes no arguments to the contrary. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
American Freedom Insurance v. Smith
green
1 sentence2015In support, plaintiff relies primarily on American Freedom Insurance Co. v. Smith, 347 Ill. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Regency Commercial Associates, LLC v. Lopax, Inc.
green
1 sentence2007It is well settled that when parties agree to and insert language into a contract, the presumption is that it was done purposefully and the language employed is to be given effect. -19- 1-06-1895 Regency Commercial Associates, LLC, 373 Ill. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Custom Builders, Inc. v. Clemons
green
1 sentence1989(Custom Builders, Inc. v. Clemons (1977), 52 Ill. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Daily v. MidAmerica Bank & Trust Co.
green
1 sentence1985Daily v. Mid-America Bank & Trust Co. (1985), 130 Ill. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Roth v. Lehman
green
2 sentences1977That section provides in part: “Subcontractors 000 may at any time after making his contract with the subcontractor, and shall within 90 days after the completion thereof, * * * cause a written notice of his claim and the amount due or to become due thereunder, to be sent by registered or certified mail, with return receipt requested, and delivery limited to addressee only, to or personally served on the owner of record or his agent or architect, or the superintendent having charge of the building or improvement and to the lending agency, if known * ” This notice to the owner has been determin 1977App. 2d 94, 97 , 116 N.E.2d 413 ). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Bushnell v. Industrial Board
green
2 sentences1919(Bushnell v. Industrial Board, 276 Ill. 262 ; Conway Co. v. Industrial Board, 282 id. 313 .) He gave a written notice of his claim for compensation on August 7, 1916,—one day after the expiration of six months from the accident,—but he testified that he also gave a verbal notice to the claim agent of the railroad company on April i, 1916, while he was being treated for his injury in Chicago, where the railroad company had sent him for that purpose. 1919(Bushnell v. Industrial Board, 276 Ill. 262 ; Conway Co. v. Industrial Board, 282 id. 313 .) He gave a written notice of his claim for compensation on August 7, 1916,—one day after the expiration of six months from the accident,—but he testified that he also gave a verbal notice to the claim agent of the railroad company on April i, 1916, while he was being treated for his injury in Chicago, where the railroad company had sent him for that purpose. | 1 | 1919–1919 |
Murphy v. Harris
neutral
1 sentence1912Murphy v. Harris, 57 Ill. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Francis Beidler & Co. v. Hutchinson
neutral
1 sentence1910Beidler v. Hutchinson, 233 Ill. 192 ; Merritt v. Crane Co., 126 Ill. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Merritt v. Crane Co.
neutral
1 sentence1910Beidler v. Hutchinson, 233 Ill. 192 ; Merritt v. Crane Co., 126 Ill. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.