Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1916–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mitchell v. City of Cedar Rapidsgreen1 sentence2025See Mitchell v. City of Cedar Rapids, 926 N.W.2d 222, 231 (Iowa 2019). | 1 | 1 |
Wolff v. McDonnellgreen2 sentences1991A. The written notice requirement in prison disciplinary cases is designed to give the inmate “a chance to marshal the facts in his defense and to clarify what the charges are, in fact.” Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 564 , 94 S.Ct. 2963, 2978 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935, 955 (1974). 1991A. The written notice requirement in prison disciplinary cases is designed to give the inmate “a chance to marshal the facts in his defense and to clarify what the charges are, in fact.” Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 564 , 94 S.Ct. 2963, 2978 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935, 955 (1974). | 1 | 1 |
Seifert v. Doslandgreen2 sentences1987In Seifert v. Dosland, 328 N.W.2d 531, 532 (Iowa 1983) we held that the plain language of section 562A.12(4) makes a *855 landlord's right to withhold a rental deposit dependent upon the landlord's compliance with the written notice requirement. 1987In Seifert v. Dosland, 328 N.W.2d 531, 532 (Iowa 1983) we held that the plain language of section 562A.12(4) makes a landlord’s right to withhold a rental deposit dependent upon the landlord’s compliance with the written notice requirement. | 1 | 1 |
Pyland v. Astleygreen2 sentences1986More recently, in Pyland v. Astley, we rejected the plaintiffs assertion that the written notice requirement was satisfied by a log entry made by the chief of police concerning injuries she received when she fell on an icy public sidewalk. 324 N.W.2d at 324, 326 . 1986More recently, in Pyland v. Astley , we rejected the plaintiff's assertion that the written notice requirement was satisfied by a log entry made by the chief of police concerning injuries she received when she fell on an icy public sidewalk. 324 N.W.2d at 324, 326 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Crittenden
neutral
1 sentence1916Co. v. Crittenden, (Kansas) 44 Pac. 1000 , in which the court, in passing upon a contract similar to the one under consideration, says: ‘ ‘ So far as it required the shipper to give notice in writing of his loss or injury, it is a valid, binding contract. | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.