Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2024 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wozniak v. Tonidandelgreen2 sentences2022Roark v. Keystate Homes, L.L.C., 2021-Ohio-707 , 169 N.E.3d 1 , ¶ 31 (8th Dist.); see Wozniak v. Tonidandel, 121 Ohio App.3d 221, 227 , 699 N.E.2d 555 (8th Dist.1997), citing State ex rel. 2022Roark v. Keystate Homes, L.L.C., 2021-Ohio-707 , 169 N.E.3d 1 , ¶ 31 (8th Dist.); see Wozniak v. Tonidandel, 121 Ohio App.3d 221, 227 , 699 N.E.2d 555 (8th Dist.1997), citing State ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
Giancola v. Azem (Slip Opinion)green2 sentences2021See Giancola v. Azem, 153 Ohio St. 3d 594 , 2018-Ohio-1694 , 109 N.E.3d 1194, at ¶ 13 ; Arnott v. Arnott, 132 Ohio St.3d 401 , 2012-Ohio-3208 , 972 N.E.2d 586 , ¶ 17. 2021See Giancola v. Azem, 153 Ohio St. 3d 594 , 2018-Ohio-1694 , 109 N.E.3d 1194, at ¶ 13 ; Arnott v. Arnott, 132 Ohio St.3d 401 , 2012-Ohio-3208 , 972 N.E.2d 586 , ¶ 17. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Irvine v. State
green
2 sentences2024As this court stated in Irvine, “[t]he fact that reasonable minds might reach different conclusions is not a basis for the reversal of the board's decision.” Irvine at 18 , 19 OBR at 15, 482 N.E.2d at 590 . 2023As this court stated in Irvine, “[t]he fact that reasonable minds might reach different conclusions is not a basis for the reversal of the board’s decision.” Irvine at 18 , 19 OBR at 15, 482 N.E.2d at 590 . | 4 | 1995–2024 |
Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. Administrator
green
2 sentences2006Tzangas , 73 Ohio St.3d at 697 . 2003Tzangas, 73 Ohio St.3d at 697 . | 4 | 1996–2006 |
Arnott v. Arnott
green
2 sentences2021Arnott v. Arnott, 132 Ohio St.3d 401 , 2012-Ohio-3208 , 972 N.E.2d 586 , ¶ 17. {¶10} The law-of-the-case doctrine has long existed in Ohio jurisprudence and provides that, “the decision of a reviewing court in a case remains the law of that case on the legal questions involved for all subsequent proceedings in the case at both the trial and reviewing levels.” Hopkins v. Dyer, 104 Ohio St.3d 461 , 2004-Ohio-6769 , 820 N.E.2d 329, ¶ 15 , quoting, Nolan v. Nolan, 11 Ohio St.3d 1, 3 , 432 N.E.2d 410 (1984). 2021Arnott v. Arnott, 132 Ohio St.3d 401 , 2012-Ohio-3208 , 972 N.E.2d 586 , ¶ 17. {¶10} The law-of-the-case doctrine has long existed in Ohio jurisprudence and provides that, “the decision of a reviewing court in a case remains the law of that case on the legal questions involved for all subsequent proceedings in the case at both the trial and reviewing levels.” Hopkins v. Dyer, 104 Ohio St.3d 461 , 2004-Ohio-6769 , 820 N.E.2d 329, ¶ 15 , quoting, Nolan v. Nolan, 11 Ohio St.3d 1, 3 , 432 N.E.2d 410 (1984). | 3 | 2018–2021 |
Hopkins v. Dyer
green
2 sentences2021Arnott v. Arnott, 132 Ohio St.3d 401 , 2012-Ohio-3208 , 972 N.E.2d 586 , ¶ 17. {¶10} The law-of-the-case doctrine has long existed in Ohio jurisprudence and provides that, “the decision of a reviewing court in a case remains the law of that case on the legal questions involved for all subsequent proceedings in the case at both the trial and reviewing levels.” Hopkins v. Dyer, 104 Ohio St.3d 461 , 2004-Ohio-6769 , 820 N.E.2d 329, ¶ 15 , quoting, Nolan v. Nolan, 11 Ohio St.3d 1, 3 , 432 N.E.2d 410 (1984). 2021Arnott v. Arnott, 132 Ohio St.3d 401 , 2012-Ohio-3208 , 972 N.E.2d 586 , ¶ 17. {¶10} The law-of-the-case doctrine has long existed in Ohio jurisprudence and provides that, “the decision of a reviewing court in a case remains the law of that case on the legal questions involved for all subsequent proceedings in the case at both the trial and reviewing levels.” Hopkins v. Dyer, 104 Ohio St.3d 461 , 2004-Ohio-6769 , 820 N.E.2d 329, ¶ 15 , quoting, Nolan v. Nolan, 11 Ohio St.3d 1, 3 , 432 N.E.2d 410 (1984). | 2 | 2018–2021 |
Nolan v. Nolan
green
2 sentences2021Arnott v. Arnott, 132 Ohio St.3d 401 , 2012-Ohio-3208 , 972 N.E.2d 586 , ¶ 17. {¶10} The law-of-the-case doctrine has long existed in Ohio jurisprudence and provides that, “the decision of a reviewing court in a case remains the law of that case on the legal questions involved for all subsequent proceedings in the case at both the trial and reviewing levels.” Hopkins v. Dyer, 104 Ohio St.3d 461 , 2004-Ohio-6769 , 820 N.E.2d 329, ¶ 15 , quoting, Nolan v. Nolan, 11 Ohio St.3d 1, 3 , 432 N.E.2d 410 (1984). 2018Arnott v. Arnott , 132 Ohio St.3d 401 , 2012-Ohio-3208 , 972 N.E.2d 586 , ¶ 17. {¶ 14} The law-of-the-case doctrine has long existed in Ohio jurisprudence. " '[T]he doctrine provides that the decision of a reviewing court in a case remains the law of that case on the legal questions involved for all subsequent proceedings in the case at both the trial and reviewing levels.' " (Brackets sic.) Hopkins v. Dyer , 104 Ohio St.3d 461 , 2004-Ohio-6769 , 820 N.E.2d 329 , ¶ 15, quoting Nolan , 11 Ohio St.3d at 3 , 462 N.E.2d 410 . | 2 | 2018–2021 |
Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. Village of Glendale
green
2 sentences1997Cincinnati Bell v. Glendale (1975), 42 Ohio St.2d 368 , 71 O.O.2d 331 , 328 N.E.2d 808 . 1997Cincinnati Bell v. Glendale (1975), 42 Ohio St.2d 368 , 71 O.O.2d 331 , 328 N.E.2d 808 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.