permanent bar in Pennsylvania

1988Snyder, 514 Pa. at 151 , 523 A.2d at 298-299 . 6 Article V, section 18(Z) is clear in its mandate that where the appropriate sanction for the errant behavior of a judicial officer justifies the imposition of the censure of removal, it carries with it a permanent bar against future judicial service.

1988Snyder, 514 Pa. at 151 , 523 A.2d at 298-299 . 6 Article V, section 18(Z) is clear in its mandate that where the appropriate sanction for the errant behavior of a judicial officer justifies the imposition of the censure of removal, it carries with it a permanent bar against future judicial service.

1934Upon the by-laws as adopted and regulating the affairs of a corporation in which a stockholder has invested his money, he relies for a management as therein provided, and it is not reasonable that even at a regular or annual meeting, radical changes should be made, without notice to him of such contempláted action.'” See, also, African Methodist Episcopal Union Church, 28 Pa. Superior Ct. 193 .

1934Upon the by-laws as adopted and regulating the affairs of a corporation in which a stockholder has invested his money, he relies for a management as therein provided, and it is not reasonable that even at a regular or annual meeting, radical changes should be made, without notice to him of such contemplated action." See, also, African Methodist Episcopal Union Church, 28 Pa. Super. 193 .

1934The Supreme Court held in Bagley v. Reno Oil Co., 201 Pa. 78, 81 , 50 A. 760 : “By-laws, having once been adopted, become the permanent rule to govern the association’s conduct, and every member of it ought to bé able to so regard them, and to feel that they will be neither repealed nor amended without notice to him of an intention to do so, even at a regular or annual meeting of the stockholders.

1934The Supreme Court held in Bagley v. Reno Oil Co., 201 Pa. 78, 81 , 50 A. 760 : “By-laws, having once been adopted, become the permanent rule to govern the association’s conduct, and every member of it ought to bé able to so regard them, and to feel that they will be neither repealed nor amended without notice to him of an intention to do so, even at a regular or annual meeting of the stockholders.

2006Bucci v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Rockwell Int'l), 758 A.2d 279 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000).

1998Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Pointer), 145 Pa.Cmwlth. 539 , 604 A.2d 315 (1992).

1998Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Pointer), 145 Pa.Cmwlth. 539 , 604 A.2d 315 (1992).

1998Unlike the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 151-188 , which was enacted to “eliminate the crippling effect of labor disputes that threaten railway interstate commerce,” Espinosa v. Norfolk and Western Railway Co., 946 F.2d 894 (6th Cir.1991), the Adamson Act (the Act) was enacted as a governmental measure to fix a permanent standard working day for employees engaged in the operation of trains upon interstate railway carriers.

1991In Matter of Glancey, 518 Pa. 276 , 542 A.2d 1350 (1988), we stated: Article V, section 18(Z) is clear in its mandate that where the appropriate sanctions for the errant behavior of a judicial officer justifies the imposition of the censure of removal, it carries with it a permanent bar against future judicial service.

1991In Matter of Glancey, 518 Pa. 276 , 542 A.2d 1350 (1988), we stated: Article V, section 18(Z) is clear in its mandate that where the appropriate sanctions for the errant behavior of a judicial officer justifies the imposition of the censure of removal, it carries with it a permanent bar against future judicial service.

1986While at the time this letter was sent by Ms. Cox, i.e., January 8, 1985, the above cited case was the law, that case has now been reversed and in Department of Transportation v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, 510 Pa. 401 , 508 A.2d 1187 (1986) Justice McDermott held that Section 9 of the Act 2 , which provides for hearing panels made up of three or more commissioners or a permanent hearing examiner, requires that the entire Commission review the record.

1986While at the time this letter was sent by Ms. Cox, i.e., January 8, 1985, the above cited case was the law, that case has now been reversed and in Department of Transportation v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, 510 Pa. 401 , 508 A.2d 1187 (1986) Justice McDermott held that Section 9 of the Act 2 , which provides for hearing panels made up of three or more commissioners or a permanent hearing examiner, requires that the entire Commission review the record.

1898If the measure be legislative in purpose or effect it is immaterial whether it be called an ordinance, resolution, by-law or rule: Howard v. Olyphant, 181 Pa. 191 .