Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sierra, Antoniogreen2 sentences2013When considering the first prong of the Sierra test, courts evaluate whether the “defendant’s driving was reckless or dangerous.” Id. 2013When considering the first prong of the Sierra test, courts evaluate whether the “defendant’s driving was reckless or dangerous.” Id. | 3 | 13 |
Cates v. Stategreen2 sentences2012We then consider the second part of the Sierra test—"whether, during the felony, the motor vehicle was capable of causing death or serious bodily injury." Sierra, 280 S.W.3d at 255 ; Foley, 327 S.W.3d at 916 (citing Cates v. State, 102 S.W.3d 735, 738 (Tex. Crim. 2012We then consider the second part of the Sierra test—"whether, during the felony, the motor vehicle was capable of causing death or serious bodily injury." Sierra, 280 S.W.3d at 255 ; Foley, 327 S.W.3d at 916 (citing Cates v. State, 102 S.W.3d 735, 738 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 4 |
Foley v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Id. (holding that evidence of intoxication and collision into a traffic barrier was sufficient to establish the first prong of the Sierra test). 2013Id. (holding that evidence of intoxication and collision into a traffic barrier was sufficient to establish the first prong of the Sierra test). | 2 | 5 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2012App. 2003); Drichas v. State, 219 S.W.3d 471, 476 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2007, pet. ref'd); Williams v. State, 946 S.W.2d 432, 435 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1997, pet. dism'd)). 2012App. 2003); Drichas v. State, 219 S.W.3d 471, 476 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2007, pet. ref'd); Williams v. State, 946 S.W.2d 432, 435 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1997, pet. dism'd)). | 2 | 2 |
Drichas v. Stategreen2 sentences2012App. 2003); Drichas v. State, 219 S.W.3d 471, 476 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2007, pet. ref'd); Williams v. State, 946 S.W.2d 432, 435 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1997, pet. dism'd)). 2012App. 2003); Drichas v. State, 219 S.W.3d 471, 476 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2007, pet. ref'd); Williams v. State, 946 S.W.2d 432, 435 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1997, pet. dism'd)). | 2 | 2 |
Dobbs, Atha Albertgreen2 sentences2014Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we hold that the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s finding that appellant’s vehicle was, in the manner of its use, a “deadly weapon.” See Dobbs v. State, 434 S.W.3d 166, 170 (Tex. Crim. 2014Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we hold that the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s finding that appellant’s vehicle was, in the manner of its use, a “deadly weapon.” See Dobbs v. State, 434 S.W.3d 166, 170 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Virginiared2 sentences2012See Jackson, 443 U.S. at 318-19 ; Brooks, 323 S.W.3d at 898-99 ; Laster, 275 S.W.3d at 517 . 2012See Jackson, 443 U.S. at 318-19 ; Brooks, 323 S.W.3d at 898-99 ; Laster, 275 S.W.3d at 517 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Verburgt v. Dorner
green
1 sentence2018In Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615 , 616–17 (Tex. 1997), the supreme court concluded that the filing of a cost bond within the 15-day period implied a motion for an extension of time. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Laster v. State
green
2 sentences2012See Jackson, 443 U.S. at 318-19 ; Brooks, 323 S.W.3d at 898-99 ; Laster, 275 S.W.3d at 517 . 2012See Jackson, 443 U.S. at 318-19 ; Brooks, 323 S.W.3d at 898-99 ; Laster, 275 S.W.3d at 517 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Brooks v. State
green
2 sentences2012See Jackson, 443 U.S. at 318-19 ; Brooks, 323 S.W.3d at 898-99 ; Laster, 275 S.W.3d at 517 . 2012See Jackson, 443 U.S. at 318-19 ; Brooks, 323 S.W.3d at 898-99 ; Laster, 275 S.W.3d at 517 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.