heavy presumption (Wisconsin) · Go Syfert
← Wisconsin issues

heavy presumption in Wisconsin

12 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2004 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Chappy v. Labor & Industry Review Commissiongreen
wis · 1987 · cited in 5 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1988–1994
2 sentences

1994Chappy v. LIRC, 136 Wis. 2d 172, 184-185 , 401 N.W.2d 568, 573-74 (1987).

1994Chappy v. LIRC, 136 Wis. 2d 172, 184-185 , 401 N.W.2d 568, 573-74 (1987).

55
Skow v. Goodrichgreen
wisctapp · 1991 · cited in 3 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1992–2004
2 sentences

1992We begin by noting the familiar rule that, like statutes enacted by the legislature, regulations adopted by administrative agencies "carry a heavy presumption of constitutionality and the challenger has the burden of proving unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt." Skow v. Goodrich, 162 Wis. 2d 448, 450 , 469 N.W.2d 888, 889 (Ct. App. 1991).

1992Another rule applicable to our discussion is that administrative rules, like statutes, "carry a heavy presumption of constitutionality and the challenger has the burden of proving unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt." Id.

13
Employers Health Insurance v. Tesmergreen
wisctapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996Co. v. Tesmer, 161 Wis. 2d 733, 737 , 469 N.W.2d 203, 205 (Ct. App. 1991).

1996Co. v. Tesmer, 161 Wis. 2d 733, 737 , 469 N.W.2d 203, 205 (Ct. App. 1991).

11
Rock Lake Estates Unit Owners Ass'n v. Township of Lake Millsgreen
wisctapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996And where, as here, both sides move for summary judgment "we generally consider the facts to be stipulated, leaving only questions of law for resolution." Rock Lake *412 Estates Unit Owners Ass'n v. Township of Lake Mills, 195 Wis. 2d 348 , 356 n.2, 536 N.W.2d 415, 418 (Ct. App. 1995). [4-6] As a general rule, "[s]tatutes carry a heavy presumption of constitutionality and the challenger has the burden of proving unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt." Employers Health Ins.

1996And where, as here, both sides move for summary judgment "we generally consider the facts to be stipulated, leaving only questions of law for resolution." Rock Lake *412 Estates Unit Owners Ass'n v. Township of Lake Mills, 195 Wis. 2d 348 , 356 n.2, 536 N.W.2d 415, 418 (Ct. App. 1995). [4-6] As a general rule, "[s]tatutes carry a heavy presumption of constitutionality and the challenger has the burden of proving unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt." Employers Health Ins.

11
Flemming v. Nestorgreen
scotus · 1960 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
2 sentences

1995We are mindful of the heavy presumption in favor of constitutionality that must be afforded statutes: Judicial inquiries into [legislative] motives are at best a hazardous matter, and when that inquiry seeks to go behind objective manifestations it becomes a dubious affair indeed. . . . "[I]t is not on slight implication and vague conjecture that the legislature is to be pronounced to have transcended its powers, and its acts to be considered as void." Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 617 (1960) (quoted source omitted).

1995We are mindful of the heavy presumption in favor of constitutionality that must be afforded statutes: Judicial inquiries into [legislative] motives are at best a hazardous matter, and when that inquiry seeks to go behind objective manifestations it becomes a dubious affair indeed. . . . "[I]t is not on slight implication and vague conjecture that the legislature is to be pronounced to have transcended its powers, and its acts to be considered as void." Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 617 (1960) (quoted source omitted).

11
Patterson v. University Board of Regentsgreen
wisctapp · 1983 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992The due process clauses "impose[ ] constraints on governmental decisions that deprive individuals of . . . property interests . . .." Patterson v. Bd. of Regents, 114 Wis. 2d 495, 500 , 339 N.W.2d 130, 132 (Ct. App. 1983).

1992The due process clauses "impose[ ] constraints on governmental decisions that deprive individuals of . . . property interests . . .." Patterson v. Bd. of Regents, 114 Wis. 2d 495, 500 , 339 N.W.2d 130, 132 (Ct. App. 1983).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
LeClair v. Natural Resources Board green
wisctapp · 1992
2 sentences

2004Bd., 168 Wis. 2d 227, 236 , 483 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1992) (quoting Skow v. Goodrich, 162 Wis. 2d 448, 450 , 469 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1991)).

2004Bd., 168 Wis. 2d 227, 236 , 483 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1992) (quoting Skow v. Goodrich, 162 Wis. 2d 448, 450 , 469 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1991)).

12004–2004
State Ex Rel. Staples v. Department of Health & Social Services green
wis · 1983
2 sentences

2004However, for simplicity, this opinion will refer to the DNR, as the Natural Resources Board is not a party to this action. 4 As the Alliance makes substantially the same arguments as the DNR in this case, the opinion shall refer to the two collectively as the DNR when discussing their positions. 5 "Administrative rules enacted pursuant to statutory rule-making authority have the force and effect of law in Wisconsin." Staples v. DHSS, 115 Wis. 2d 363, 367 , 340 N.W.2d 194 (1983). 6 Nor does the present case involve the constitutionality of an administrative rule. "[L]ike statutes enacted by the

2004However, for simplicity, this opinion will refer to the DNR, as the Natural Resources Board is not a party to this action. 4 As the Alliance makes substantially the same arguments as the DNR in this case, the opinion shall refer to the two collectively as the DNR when discussing their positions. 5 "Administrative rules enacted pursuant to statutory rule-making authority have the force and effect of law in Wisconsin." Staples v. DHSS, 115 Wis. 2d 363, 367 , 340 N.W.2d 194 (1983). 6 Nor does the present case involve the constitutionality of an administrative rule. "[L]ike statutes enacted by the

12004–2004
Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement green
scotus · 1992
1 sentence

2003Id. at 130 .

12003–2003
Phillips v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission green
wisctapp · 1992
1 sentence

1994Statutes "carry a heavy presumption of constitutionality and the challenger has the burden of proving unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt." Id.

11994–1994

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WI § Wis. Stat. § 893.89 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

MI 223 (1982–2026) NY 84 (1975–2026) TX 59 (1973–2026) IL 38 (1975–2025) CA 36 (1967–2024) AL 29 (1981–2017) WA 29 (1968–2026) MS 18 (1990–2025) PA 18 (1975–2026) FL 17 (1975–2023) OH 17 (1982–2022) IN 16 (1992–2026) WI 12 (1988–2004) MA 11 (1982–2020) DE 11 (1992–2025) MD 11 (1982–2026) CO 9 (1971–2010) AZ 9 (1984–2018) TN 9 (2001–2017) RI 8 (1972–2010) MN 7 (1975–2015) NV 6 (1976–2020) GA 6 (1984–2022) NJ 6 (1968–1993) LA 6 (1982–2023) ME 5 (1996–2022) AR 5 (1980–2025) CT 5 (1996–2005) IA 4 (1984–2016) ND 4 (1986–1996) UT 4 (1983–2003) KY 4 (2010–2024) WV 3 (1989–2015) WY 3 (2011–2015) NC 3 (1979–2017) NH 3 (2010–2023) SC 2 (2013–2016) DC 2 (1979–2008) NM 2 (1996–2011) VA 2 (1977–2023) KS 2 (1984–2020) OK 2 (1979–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check