Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Paternity of Kdgreen2 sentences2026Thus, while “a prior restraint is not per se unconstitutional,” id., it does come to a court “ ‘bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity,’” In re Paternity of K.D., 929 N.E.2d 863, 868 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (quoting N.Y. 2026A prior restraint on speech is not per se unconstitutional but “does come to a court ‘bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity.’” Id. (quoting In re Paternity of K.D., 929 N.E.2d 863, 868 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (quoting N.Y. | 4 | 4 |
New York Times Co. v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2010"Any system of prior restraints of expression comes to [the court] bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity." New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713, 824 , 91 S.Ct. 2140 , 29 L.Ed.2d 822 (1971) ("Pentagon Papers") (internal quotation marks and cite omitted). 2010"Any system of prior restraints of expression comes to [the court] bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity." New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713, 824 , 91 S.Ct. 2140 , 29 L.Ed.2d 822 (1971) ("Pentagon Papers") (internal quotation marks and cite omitted). | 3 | 7 |
Alexander v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2010See Alexander, 509 U.S. at 550 , 113 S.Ct. 2766 . 2010See Alexander, 509 U.S. at 550 , 113 S.Ct. 2766 . | 2 | 2 |
Mishler v. MAC Systems, Inc.green1 sentence2017Mishler v. MAC Systems, 771 N.E.2d 92, 95 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
National Polymer Products, Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corporationgreen1 sentence1993See National Polymer Products v. Borg-Warner Corp., (6th Cir.1981) 641 F.2d 418, 423-424 (although recognizing that First Amendment rights may be waived, there was no' waiver where the parties did not intend to extend the protective order to information disclosed at trial; although prior restraints on speech bear a heavy presumption against their constitutional validity, considerations that may bear against that presumption are whether disclosure might jeopardize the party’s right to a fair administration of justice, whether disclosure will actually impair legitimate business interests of that | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
green
2 sentences2026Thus, while “a prior restraint is not per se unconstitutional,” id., it does come to a court “ ‘bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity,’” In re Paternity of K.D., 929 N.E.2d 863, 868 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (quoting N.Y. 2024Thus, while “a prior restraint is not per se unconstitutional,” id., it does come to a court “‘bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity.’” In re Paternity of K.D., 929 N.E.2d 863, 868 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010) (quoting N.Y. | 2 | 2024–2026 |
Aberdeen Apartments v. Cary Campbell Realty Alliance, Inc.
green
2 sentences2005Id. 2005Id. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe
green
2 sentences2001Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe, 402 U.S. 415, 419 , 91 S.Ct. 1575 , 29 L.Ed.2d 1 (1971). 2001Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe, 402 U.S. 415, 419 , 91 S.Ct. 1575 , 29 L.Ed.2d 1 (1971). | 2 | 1996–2001 |
Barlow v. Sipes
green
2 sentences2005Barlow, 744 N.E.2d at 9 . 2005Barlow, 744 N.E.2d at 9 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences1995New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713, 714 , 91 S.Ct. 2140, 2141-42 , 29 L.Ed.2d 822 (1971) (the Pentagon Papers case) (quoting Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 70 , 88 S.Ct. 631 , 689, 9 L.Ed.2d 584 (1963)). 1995New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713, 714 , 91 S.Ct. 2140, 2141-42 , 29 L.Ed.2d 822 (1971) (the Pentagon Papers case) (quoting Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 70 , 88 S.Ct. 631 , 689, 9 L.Ed.2d 584 (1963)). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Fugate v. State
green
2 sentences1994Id. 1994Id. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Williams v. State
green
1 sentence1992Williams v. State (1987), Ind., 508 N.E.2d 1264 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.