response defense in Florida

2015See McCullum v. State, 488 So. 2d 125, 126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (“[T]he trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the prosecuting attorney . . . to play the defendant’s tape recorded confession to the jury during the rebuttal portion of the prosecutor’s closing argument where the recording itself had been admitted as evidence . . . and the replaying of it . . . was an appropriate response to the defense attorney’s closing argument.”).

2014See McCullmn v. State, 488 So.2d 125, 126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (“[T]he trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the prosecuting attorney ... to play the defendant’s tape recorded confession to the jury during the rebuttal portion of the prosecutor’s closing argument where the recording itself had been admitted as evidence ... and the replaying of it ... was an appropriate response to the defense attorney’s closing argument.”).

2025See, e.g., Young v. State, 189 So. 3d 956, 961 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (“The trial court should have ceased the inquiry when, as an officer of the court, the assistant public defender asserted that a response to the inquiry would have required the disclosure of privileged information.

2007See Campbell, 718 So.2d at 886 . [2] It is also within the trial court's authority to direct the State to file a response to the rule 3.800(a) motion so that the State may have an opportunity to explain an apparent discrepancy before the matter is adjudicated.

2007See State v. Pitts, 936 So.2d 1111, 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). [8] In Ramirez , the court construed section 39.037(2), Florida Statutes (1995), as requiring law enforcement to attempt and to continue such attempt to contact a juvenile's parents upon taking a juvenile into custody. 739 So.2d at 577 .

2007See State v. Pitts, 936 So.2d 1111, 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). [8] In Ramirez , the court construed section 39.037(2), Florida Statutes (1995), as requiring law enforcement to attempt and to continue such attempt to contact a juvenile's parents upon taking a juvenile into custody. 739 So.2d at 577 .

1997See State v. Mata, 71 Haw. 319 , 789 P.2d 1122, 1125-26 (1990)("[W]e hold that neither a reference of an attorney's conduct to the disciplinary board, nor a response to inquiry with respect thereto by Disciplinary Counsel, is a ground for the disqualification of a judge."); Blacknell v. State, 502 N.E.2d 899, 904 (Ind.1987)(holding that judge had an obligation to report attorney's disciplinary infraction, and that such reporting "is in no way evidence of [lack of] impartiality" supporting the appointment of a new judge). [11] As held in the similar context of a party filing a civil action agai

1997See State v. Mata, 71 Haw. 319 , 789 P.2d 1122, 1125-26 (1990)("[W]e hold that neither a reference of an attorney's conduct to the disciplinary board, nor a response to inquiry with respect thereto by Disciplinary Counsel, is a ground for the disqualification of a judge."); Blacknell v. State, 502 N.E.2d 899, 904 (Ind.1987)(holding that judge had an obligation to report attorney's disciplinary infraction, and that such reporting "is in no way evidence of [lack of] impartiality" supporting the appointment of a new judge). [11] As held in the similar context of a party filing a civil action agai

1997See State v. Mata, 71 Haw. 319 , 789 P.2d 1122, 1125-26 (1990)("[W]e hold that neither a reference of an attorney's conduct to the disciplinary board, nor a response to inquiry with respect thereto by Disciplinary Counsel, is a ground for the disqualification of a judge."); Blacknell v. State, 502 N.E.2d 899, 904 (Ind.1987)(holding that judge had an obligation to report attorney's disciplinary infraction, and that such reporting "is in no way evidence of [lack of] impartiality" supporting the appointment of a new judge). [11] As held in the similar context of a party filing a civil action agai

1986See United States v. Guess, 745 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1219 , 84 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985).

1986See United States v. Guess, 745 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1219 , 84 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985).

1986See United States v. Guess, 745 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1219 , 84 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985).

1981See, e.g., Allen v. State, 320 So.2d 828 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), appeal dism., 330 So.2d 725 (Fla.1976); Dixon v. State, 206 So.2d 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); United States v. Tasto, 586 F.2d 1068 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 928 , 99 S.Ct. 1263 , 59 L.Ed.2d 484 (1979).

1928See State ex rel. v. White, Judge, 40 Fla. 297 , 24 So.