Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Watts v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2015Dyson v. United States, 450 A.2d 432, 442 (D.C.1982); see also Tillman v. United States, 487 A.2d 1152, 1154 (D.C.1985) (“the prosecutor acted properly by pointing out in rebuttal that counsel’s theory was not supported by any evidence”); Watts v. United States, 449 A.2d 308, 313 (D.C.1982) ("the prosecutor’s comment was a response to defense counsel’s speculation ... and it is likely that the jury perceived it as such”). 58 . 1985In Watts v. United States, 449 A.2d 308 (D.C.1982), on a similar record, we rejected a Griffin-based argument that the prosecutor had commented on the defendant’s failure to testify, holding that “the prosecutor’s comment was a response to defense counsel’s speculation ... and it is likely that the jury perceived it as such, rather than as a reference to appellants’ silence.” Id. at 313 (citations omitted). | 3 | 3 |
Tillman v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2015Dyson v. United States, 450 A.2d 432, 442 (D.C.1982); see also Tillman v. United States, 487 A.2d 1152, 1154 (D.C.1985) (“the prosecutor acted properly by pointing out in rebuttal that counsel’s theory was not supported by any evidence”); Watts v. United States, 449 A.2d 308, 313 (D.C.1982) ("the prosecutor’s comment was a response to defense counsel’s speculation ... and it is likely that the jury perceived it as such”). 58 . | 1 | 1 |
Dyson v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2015Dyson v. United States, 450 A.2d 432, 442 (D.C.1982); see also Tillman v. United States, 487 A.2d 1152, 1154 (D.C.1985) (“the prosecutor acted properly by pointing out in rebuttal that counsel’s theory was not supported by any evidence”); Watts v. United States, 449 A.2d 308, 313 (D.C.1982) ("the prosecutor’s comment was a response to defense counsel’s speculation ... and it is likely that the jury perceived it as such”). 58 . | 1 | 1 |
Hinkel v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1990The prosecutor’s statement about Melvin Walker was a proper response to defense counsel’s impeachment of Mr. Walker with prior inconsistent statements to the police and cross-examination which attacked Walker's credibility, Hinkel v. United States, 544 A.2d 283, 285-86 (D.C.1988), Hyman, supra, 342 A.2d at 45 . | 1 | 1 |
Sherrod v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1985See Sherrod, supra, 478 A.2d at 657-58 ; Reed v. United States, 403 A.2d 725, 730 (D.C.1979); Christian v. United *558 States, 394 A.2d 1 , 33 n. 86 (D.C.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct. 2889 , 61 L.Ed.2d 315 (1979); Watts v. United States, 449 A.2d 308, 313 (D.C.1982). 1985See Sherrod, supra, 478 A.2d at 657-58 ; Reed v. United States, 403 A.2d 725, 730 (D.C.1979); Christian v. United *558 States, 394 A.2d 1 , 33 n. 86 (D.C.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct. 2889 , 61 L.Ed.2d 315 (1979); Watts v. United States, 449 A.2d 308, 313 (D.C.1982). | 1 | 1 |
Reed v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1985See Sherrod, supra, 478 A.2d at 657-58 ; Reed v. United States, 403 A.2d 725, 730 (D.C.1979); Christian v. United *558 States, 394 A.2d 1 , 33 n. 86 (D.C.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct. 2889 , 61 L.Ed.2d 315 (1979); Watts v. United States, 449 A.2d 308, 313 (D.C.1982). | 1 | 1 |
Byrd v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1982See Byrd, supra at 1218 ; United States v. Harris, 201 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 17 , 627 F.2d 474, 476 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 961 , 101 S.Ct. 375 , 66 L.Ed.2d 229 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
Clarke v. District of Columbiagreen1 sentence1978Proof of favorable termination is merely a plaintiff’s response to a claim of privilege based on probable cause. *199 The gist of any complaint for false arrest or false imprisonment is an unlawful detention and that being shown the burden is imposed upon the defendant to establish that there was probable cause for the arrest . ****** [T]he absence of probable cause for her arrest was not an essential element of appellant’s proof, but was rather simply a matter of defense to the allegations of the complaint. . . . [Clarke v. District of Columbia, D.C.App., 311 A.2d 508, 511 (1973).] Accordingl | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Young
green
2 sentences2015United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 11 , 105 S.Ct. 1038 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). 59 . 2015United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 11 , 105 S.Ct. 1038 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). 59 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Kotteakos v. United States
green
2 sentences2013The government argues that the less-stringent test of Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946) applies, i.e., whether we can “say, with fair assurance, after pondering all that happened without stripping the erroneous action from the whole, that the judgment was not substantially swayed by the error.” Our resolution of the issue is as follows: The jury’s question appeared to ask whether appellant could be convicted solely on the basis of something he did on Q Street after the robbery. 2013The government argues that the less-stringent test of Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946) applies, i.e., whether we can “say, with fair assurance, after pondering all that happened without stripping the erroneous action from the whole, that the judgment was not substantially swayed by the error.” Our resolution of the issue is as follows: The jury’s question appeared to ask whether appellant could be convicted solely on the basis of something he did on Q Street after the robbery. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Chapman v. California
red
2 sentences2013Appellant argues that the inadequacy of the court’s response was an error of constitutional dimension, requiring us to apply the harmless-beyond-a-reasonable doubt standard articulated in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). 2013Appellant argues that the inadequacy of the court’s response was an error of constitutional dimension, requiring us to apply the harmless-beyond-a-reasonable doubt standard articulated in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Irick v. United States
green
2 sentences1990"False exculpatory statements made to law enforcement officers constitute independent circumstantial evidence of guilty consciousness.” Irick v. United States, 565 A.2d 26, 30 n. 8 (D.C.1989) (citations omitted). 1990I believe, however, that Allen's lies and contradictions are an important part of the overall picture in our attempt, from a distance, to assess the overall strength of the case for the prosecution and the response from the defense. [17] "False exculpatory statements made to law enforcement officers constitute independent circumstantial evidence of guilty consciousness." Irick v. United States, 565 A.2d 26 , 30 n. 8 (D.C.1989) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Hyman v. United States
green
1 sentence1990The prosecutor’s statement about Melvin Walker was a proper response to defense counsel’s impeachment of Mr. Walker with prior inconsistent statements to the police and cross-examination which attacked Walker's credibility, Hinkel v. United States, 544 A.2d 283, 285-86 (D.C.1988), Hyman, supra, 342 A.2d at 45 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Christian v. United States
green
1 sentence1985See Sherrod, supra, 478 A.2d at 657-58 ; Reed v. United States, 403 A.2d 725, 730 (D.C.1979); Christian v. United *558 States, 394 A.2d 1 , 33 n. 86 (D.C.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct. 2889 , 61 L.Ed.2d 315 (1979); Watts v. United States, 449 A.2d 308, 313 (D.C.1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Haner v. United States
green
1 sentence1985See Sherrod, supra, 478 A.2d at 657-58 ; Reed v. United States, 403 A.2d 725, 730 (D.C.1979); Christian v. United *558 States, 394 A.2d 1 , 33 n. 86 (D.C.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct. 2889 , 61 L.Ed.2d 315 (1979); Watts v. United States, 449 A.2d 308, 313 (D.C.1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Clark v. United States
green
1 sentence1985See Sherrod, supra, 478 A.2d at 657-58 ; Reed v. United States, 403 A.2d 725, 730 (D.C.1979); Christian v. United *558 States, 394 A.2d 1 , 33 n. 86 (D.C.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct. 2889 , 61 L.Ed.2d 315 (1979); Watts v. United States, 449 A.2d 308, 313 (D.C.1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
United States v. John Harris, Jr.
green
2 sentences1982See Byrd, supra at 1218 ; United States v. Harris, 201 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 17 , 627 F.2d 474, 476 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 961 , 101 S.Ct. 375 , 66 L.Ed.2d 229 (1980). 1982See Byrd, supra at 1218 ; United States v. Harris, 201 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 17 , 627 F.2d 474, 476 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 961 , 101 S.Ct. 375 , 66 L.Ed.2d 229 (1980). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Salinas v. United States
green
1 sentence1982See Byrd, supra at 1218 ; United States v. Harris, 201 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 17 , 627 F.2d 474, 476 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 961 , 101 S.Ct. 375 , 66 L.Ed.2d 229 (1980). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
McDonald v. Smith
green
1 sentence1982See Byrd, supra at 1218 ; United States v. Harris, 201 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 17 , 627 F.2d 474, 476 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 961 , 101 S.Ct. 375 , 66 L.Ed.2d 229 (1980). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Tecumseh v. United States
green
1 sentence1982See Byrd, supra at 1218 ; United States v. Harris, 201 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 17 , 627 F.2d 474, 476 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 961 , 101 S.Ct. 375 , 66 L.Ed.2d 229 (1980). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.