Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1968–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Aleong v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS AND PROF. REG.green2 sentences2025We start with the basic premise that “[a]ny person who receives written notice of an agency decision and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hearing on such matters.” Aleong v. State, Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l Regul., 963 So. 2d 799, 801 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (quoting Fla. Admin. 2014Regulation, 98 So.3d 189, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that when Wojnowski “failed to timely seek an administrative hearing to challenge the facts supporting OFR’s intended action, he waived any further opportunity to do so,” citing Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-106.111(4)); Diaz v. State, Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l Regulation, 21 So.3d 919, 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that any person who receives written notice of an agency decision that does or may determine substantial interests and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hear | 3 | 3 |
Wojnowski v. State, Office of Financial Regulationgreen2 sentences2019Regulation, 98 So. 3d 189, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that the appellant, by failing to timely seek an administrative hearing to challenge the facts supporting the appellee’s intended action, waived any further opportunity to do so); Aleong v. State, Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l Regulation, 963 So. 2d 799, 801-02 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (upholding the Board of Veterinary Medicine’s order granting the Department’s Motion for Waiver of Rights filed after the appellant failed to make a timely request for a hearing to dispute the Department’s allegations); Autoworld of Am. 2014Regulation, 98 So.3d 189, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that when Wojnowski “failed to timely seek an administrative hearing to challenge the facts supporting OFR’s intended action, he waived any further opportunity to do so,” citing Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-106.111(4)); Diaz v. State, Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l Regulation, 21 So.3d 919, 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that any person who receives written notice of an agency decision that does or may determine substantial interests and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hear | 2 | 2 |
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahasseegreen1 sentence2026Code 28-106.111(4) (“Any person who receives written notice of an agency decision and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hearing on such matters.”); Nicks v. Dep’t of Bus. & Pro., etc., 957 So. 2d 65 , 66 n.1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“When a party waives the right to challenge the factual allegations of an administrative complaint, either by requesting an informal hearing pursuant to section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes, or by failing to respond to the complaint at all, the facts of the complaint are deemed to be admitted. “); § 489.129(1) | 1 | 1 |
BAC Funding Consortium Inc. ISAOA/ATIMA v. Jean-Jacquesgreen1 sentence2018See BAC Funding Consortium Inc. ISAOA/ATIMA v. Jean-Jacques, 28 So. 3d 936, 938 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) ("When exhibits are attached to a complaint, the contents of the exhibits control over the allegations of the complaint."). | 1 | 1 |
Autoworld of America Corp. v. Department of Highway Safetygreen1 sentence2014Corp. v. Dep’t of Highway Safety, 754 So.2d 76, 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“In order to challenge the factual basis of the complaint, it would have been necessary for Autoworld to request a formal hearing under subsection 120.57(1).”). | 1 | 1 |
Diaz v. State, Department of Business & Professional Regulationgreen1 sentence2014Regulation, 98 So.3d 189, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that when Wojnowski “failed to timely seek an administrative hearing to challenge the facts supporting OFR’s intended action, he waived any further opportunity to do so,” citing Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-106.111(4)); Diaz v. State, Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l Regulation, 21 So.3d 919, 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that any person who receives written notice of an agency decision that does or may determine substantial interests and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hear | 1 | 1 |
INS. CO. OF ST., PA v. Estate of Guzmangreen1 sentence1986See also Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Estate of Guzman, 421 So.2d 597, 605 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (“[n]o purpose would have been served by requiring the lawyer to file a written request for an instruction which the judge already stated she would not give”). | 1 | 1 |
RD JACKSON v. Harsco Corp.green1 sentence1985See Jackson v. Harsco Corp., 364 So.2d 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 376 So.2d 72 (Fla.1979); Ellis v. Golcondo Corp., 352 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), cert. denied, 365 So.2d 714 (Fla.1978). | 1 | 1 |
Hand v. Stategreen1 sentence1968Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury." (Emphasis supplied.) Under our interpretation of the cases of Brown v. State, Fla. 1968, 206 So.2d 377 , and Hand v. State, Fla. 1967, 199 So.2d 100 , a written request for an instruction on a lesser included offense is unnecessary, provided the trial counsel orally requests the instruction and the judge refuses to give it. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nicks v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS AND PROF. REG.
green
1 sentence2026Code 28-106.111(4) (“Any person who receives written notice of an agency decision and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hearing on such matters.”); Nicks v. Dep’t of Bus. & Pro., etc., 957 So. 2d 65 , 66 n.1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“When a party waives the right to challenge the factual allegations of an administrative complaint, either by requesting an informal hearing pursuant to section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes, or by failing to respond to the complaint at all, the facts of the complaint are deemed to be admitted. “); § 489.129(1) | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Appel v. FLA., DIV. OF LICENSING
green
1 sentence2002For some unknown reason, it was postmarked the following day. [2] Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-106. 111 provides, in pertinent part: 28-106.111 Point of Entry into Proceedings and Mediation. . . . . (2) Unless otherwise provided by law, persons seeking a hearing on an agency decision which does or may determine their substantial interests shall file a petition for hearing with the agency within 21 days of receipt of written notice of the decision. . . . . (4) Any person who receives written notice of an agency decision and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Ellis v. Golconda Corp.
green
1 sentence1985See Jackson v. Harsco Corp., 364 So.2d 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 376 So.2d 72 (Fla.1979); Ellis v. Golcondo Corp., 352 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), cert. denied, 365 So.2d 714 (Fla.1978). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Long v. Dept. of Admin., Div. of Retirement
green
1 sentence1983Chapter 22J-1.03(2)(a), Florida Administrative Rules. [4] Long v. Department of Administration, 428 So.2d 688 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Corbett v. DADE CTY. BD., PUB. INSTR.
green
1 sentence1982Corbett v. Dade County Board of Public Instruction, 372 So.2d 971 , 974-75 n. 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So.2d 1192 (Fla. 1980). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Brown v. State
green
1 sentence1968Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury." (Emphasis supplied.) Under our interpretation of the cases of Brown v. State, Fla. 1968, 206 So.2d 377 , and Hand v. State, Fla. 1967, 199 So.2d 100 , a written request for an instruction on a lesser included offense is unnecessary, provided the trial counsel orally requests the instruction and the judge refuses to give it. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.